Posted on 01/07/2014 8:55:12 PM PST by Innovative
On average, the high temperatures are getting higher, and the lows are getting higher too. Global warming is as real and serious as ever, it's just exceedingly gradual compared with the dramatic temperature swings that are still part of living in midlatitudes in winter.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
I haven’t had a good tomato crop in four years because we haven’t had any real good hot spells.
Lunatics.
Real science has proven beyond question, repeatedly, that no truly insane person is aware of his insanity. Even condescending ones.
The only thing that will disprove global warming is the drying up of grant money.
We have cooling now - if it continues and I have heard that the current sun cycle will last 100 years - we will pray for GW.
And we can’t do anything about either one.
I had fun trolling some idiot libs today, told them that "Of course the ice breaker got stuck near Antarctica, it is winter and in winter the ice freezes, the ice caps almost melt in summer and even more since global warming"
The morons believed me and when i confronted them with the fact I was trolling(lying) to them and that is was summer in Antarctica they didn't believe me and thought I was lying about lying to them...
Bunch of clueless fools the GORE-BULL warming crowd.
They probably belive this graphic if I showed it to them.
Say, man! I have been irritated by this cold for, well, selfish reasons, but am wondering if ‘polar vortices’ have tropical vortices (hurricanes) as a positive feedback phenomena.
Like, within a year of the polar vortex.
Do they not get the idea that earth has an axial tilt and solar output affects our weather....
Next they will tell us we live on a cube shaped world and up is down and right is left and up is down...
Australia is starting to wake up, they elected a sensible Prime Minister.
.
Maurice Newman: Global warming a ‘delusion’
“In an opinion piece in The Australian newspaper, Maurice Newman, the Prime Minister’s pick as head of his Business Advisory Council, claimed high energy costs caused by the carbon tax and the renewable energy target, introduced by the Howard government, had eroded Australia’s competitiveness. Under Labor and the Greens, Australia had been taken ‘’hostage’’ by ‘’climate change madness’’, Mr Newman wrote.”
Circa 2008 this new ice was forming around St. Matthew's Island around Christmas. So all I'm saying is, don't go off half cocked!
Your dogmatic right-wing assertion only proves that you need to be disarmed, silenced, and deprived of an automobile in the name of Social Justice.
Have you ever tried to go back and look at the initial temperature data? The old thermometer (that's right thermometer, remember them?) readings. The ones that were written down by hand and kept on paper. Well, they are just plain not available. The only records left are the computer print-outs that have been "corrected" for some kind of bias that no one can explain.
And, when one looks carefully at the "corrections" it turns out that the older the data the more the temperature has been corrected down. These "corrections" are more than satisfactory evidence that the warming trend is indeed man-made, but not man-made in the sense you mean, man-made in these sense that the real data has been systematically biased toward "colder in the past".
Until Michael Mann and his merry band of miscreant charlatans are willing to disclose the original data, the "corrected" data is good for nothing but wrapping fish.
Record profits don’t disprove a stock’s rise
Record cheese production doesn’t disprove an increase in milk production
Record gold production doesn’t disprove increased mining
Record births don’t disprove a rise in population
Increased oil production doesn’t disprove increased exploration
Increased stupidity does not prove anything.....
The historical record of warming during inter-glacial periods satisfies me pretty well.
Especially since we're not in a particularly warm part of this one.
I’d like for one of these “experts” to comment on what the climate conditions were like leading up to one of the Ice Ages we’ve experienced and not the Tropical Age they claim we’re entering.
If a new ice age started up, putting the northern hemisphere into a deep-freeze, the warmists would not only say that it was due to “glo-bull” warming”, but it was made much worse by it.
If you can prove that they were incorrect and that you suffered damages (emotional distress) and/or losses (couldn’t hold your job due to the emotional distress), then yes... you have a case to sue them.
“On average” the warmers are becoming more insane.
Damn.. someone beat me to that comment. lol
Then record heat does not proof global warming either.
Let's face it, to the faithful nothing, I mean absolutely nothing will disprove global warming. They believe in it as deeply as you do your religious faith. We could have glaciers pushing down across MN and ND and they would still claim global warming was the cause.
I actually tried this. Ran into an acquaintance who was talking to someone I didn't know (and still don't). Stranger is "one of them" and they were debating GW. I finally asked the guy point blank "What kind of verifiable evidence would you need to see to believe there is no global warming?" I got a blank stare. They are apparently so invested in this they literally unable to comprehend any alternative or that they are in fact wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.