The same thing that would happen at Marks & Spencer if a Muslim refused to wait on a Christian.
and wouldn't you support the right of an employer to allow a Catholic pharmacist to defer from filling a request for an abortifacient?
And wouldn't you support the right of a Christian employer to not have to pay for abortion services for his employees?
By the same token, there's nothing wrong with not requiring Muslim employees from handling pork or alcohol.
This should be a well-publicized qualification for the job of cashier. Me, I'd never be a customer there again.
Which they do not have, according to the courts.
The problem is we are talking about Muslims and Islam. Islam is an imperialist and supremacist ideology. This deference reinforces their belief that they are superior to all others.
I believe the exception releasing Muslims from handling pork is a special exception for Muslims. I do not for one minute believe that if a Christian refused service to a Muslim they would not be fired.
I believe if a bakery wants to refuse to make cakes for a Homosexual couple they have that right, but of course they don’t. The case is in court right now whether or not the Obmacare requirement to pay for abortifacients will be held up.
I believe that to force anyone to buy any product they do not want is wrong.
Sounds reasonable
BUT
1. The Muslim doesn’t make, cut, count, prepare, wrap, or actually sell the liquor or pork;
2. The Muslim’s name is not on the label.
3. The Muslim happens to live in a Judeo-Christian country that up until 1965 refused to make mandatory the selling of both abortifacients AND birth control.
So let’s go full-bore. Why not allow the muzzies to stone OUR adulterers and gays as well as their own and force 6-times-a-day howled prayer in every city or town in which even one of them lives. And, oh yes, let’s compound yet another wrong and call it right.
Sorry—I’ve had it.