Posted on 12/19/2013 12:10:45 PM PST by BunnySlippers
A&E knew all about "Duck Dynasty" star Phil Robertson feelings toward gays when it hired him -- because the guy openly preached that gays were going to hell years before the series started.
Take a look at the video (above) of a 2010 sermon at Berean Bible Church in Pennsylvania ... it's pretty much your typical bible-thumping drill. Phil calls gay people shameful, perverse, heartless, faithless, senseless God haters ... destined for the burning pits of hell.
snip
(Excerpt) Read more at tmz.com ...
Maybe a PR stunt by A&E?
Acting on homosexual desires is bad. It is bad for the person, bad for the family and bad for society. This is supported by endless biological, sociological, and psychological studies. It is science. Besides, your common sense will tell you that we should not encourage any activity that, if undertaken by everyone, would lead to the end of civilization within a generation. The acceptance of homosexuality is bizarre. It is akin to a worldwide push to accept and encourage anorexia.
Who cares what TMZ says?
bashed?
Haha. I’ve had some great dealings with southern dealers, actually. Guys in NYC, though, are awful.
Read Romans 1:18-32...
acceptance of homosexuality is God’s judgment on our nation
The long knives are out.
Not “Duck Dynasty”, a&e gets the money from that, buy “Duck Commander” stuff, that’s the family’s brand.
The Bible covers God’s feeling on the subject in Leviticus 18:22 and in Romans 1:20-28. What part of “abomination” and “unclean” don’t they understand?
Yep, one needs to look no further than to Kevin Jennings and Dan Savage.
It’s the message silly!
i really don’t expect much else for TMZ. TMZ loves to get inot the mud and fling it around
Once again we see the Headline is a LIE. Robertson DID NOT bash gays.
He simply quoted scripture regarding them. That’s not bashing.
If it were me; I’d call them faggots, rump-rangers and pole smokers. And worse.
Now that might (maybe) be bashing. But what Phil did was not bashing.
Exactly.
The one that had “mother issues”?
lulz. I loved that episode!
I’m not much on boycotts, they usually have little effect on major corporations. But I don’t go out of my way to give those who oppose my beliefs money, either. So if someone can help me be better-informed about where my money goes, I appreciate it. In this case, I’d rather know if the money is going to the family or to a&e.
Over 10% of newsrooms are homosexual and push the lavender mafia agenda.
At TMZ that figure may be well over 50%.
Isn’t that site run by a blazing queen? I remember some picture of someone connected with the site, presumably a male, overweight, boarding an airplane, dressed in tight shiny pink “cheerleader” shorts and other atrocious get-up. A Perez something?
Long catty claws from hysteric gay men (the same sort who savage Sarah Palin at every turn).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.