Skip to comments.
Naval Officer Admits Raping Own Daughter, Navy Promotes Him Anyway
Opposing Views ^
| 12/10/2013
| By Jonathan Vankin
Posted on 12/10/2013 11:52:32 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
As the Pentagon begins a year-long inquiry into why child abuse is rapidly increasing throughout the U.S Armed Services, a Navy officer who sexually abused his own two children was not only given a pass by Navy brass, he got a promotion.
The case was exposed in a recent story in the Virginian-Pilot, a newspaper based in Norfolk, Va., and the details are chilling. Four years ago, according to evidence and testimony amassed by Child Protective Services in Virginia, the Navy lieutenant — who was not named by the newspaper in order to protect the privacy of his traumatized kids — raped his 13-year-old daughter, pinning her to a bed and forcing himself on her after two years of touching her in inappropriate ways.
In the years since the 2009 rape, the girl has suffered severe depression and anxiety, along with suicidal thoughts and a stomach ulcer.
The lieutenant also abused his 10-year-old son, according to the social workers on the case, repeatedly touching the boy’s genitals through his clothes and on one occasion, tying the boy up, duct-taping his mouth shut then forcing him to watch as the lieutenant had sex with a girlfriend.
The lieutenant had separated from his wife, the children’s mother, at the time. When a judge decided that the wife’s allegations of child abuse could hurt the officer’s Navy career, he cited her for contempt of court and ordered her to pay a $5,000 fine, which she can’t afford, or spend 10 days in jail.
Nonetheless, social workers placed the officer's name on the state’s Child Abuse and Neglect Registry and obtained a court order forbidding him from coming within two miles of his children — he has four — until they each turn 18.
The lieutenant signed a document admitting to Child Protection authorities that he committed “Level 2” abuse against his daughter. The social workers accused him of Level 1 abuse, which means that the child suffered “serious harm” as a result. Level 2 means the child endured “moderate” harm.
Despite the evidence, including his own admission, the Navy cleared the officer and let him keep his $96,000 per year job, with a promotion.
In fact, the newspaper examined 1,400 child abuse allegations against U.S. Navy service members and found that the Navy threw out half of them as “unsubstantiated.”
After the Virginian-Pilot story ran, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service opened a new investigation into the abuse allegations against the lieutenant.
In 2011 and 2012, the four branches of the armed forces had 12,881 cases of child abuse and neglect reported, 67 of them leading to the death of a child. More than 750 were sexual assault cases.
In the Navy alone, 42 children died from abuse and neglect from 2008 to 2012. From 2009 to 2012, the Navy had 3,336 child abuse and neglect cases.
In November, the Defense Department announced that it was forming a special working group to investigate the military child abuse epidemic. The group is expected to release its first report in February, part of a projected year-long study.
SOURCES: Virginian-Pilot, Navy Times
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: navy; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Oh...and I don’t pretend to know if this guy is guilty or not...I would want a whole lot more information than I’ve got now.
To: aomagrat
Yep. From the Pilot article....
“The military is reluctant to make findings in any kind of sexual abuse cases,” said Betty Wade Coyle, executive director emeritus of Prevent Child Abuse Hampton Roads. “Especially if it’s an officer, it practically takes an act of Congress.”
22
posted on
12/10/2013 12:10:44 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
who was not named Must have been something like Trayvon or another of 0 bummer's sons.
23
posted on
12/10/2013 12:12:49 PM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
To: Drew68
So what if he did plead down? By his own admission - HE IS GUILTY and should be doing hard time as of now.
24
posted on
12/10/2013 12:13:06 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Constant war without a clearly defined strategy, using the armed forces as a Petri dish for social experimentation, constant fear of having a career ruined by not adhering to PC dictates, all have hollowed out our military to the point that it is close to being a detriment to our national security.
25
posted on
12/10/2013 12:14:30 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(Don't twerk me, Bro!)
To: Responsibility2nd
But, God help the soldiers accused of abusing an Islamic.
26
posted on
12/10/2013 12:15:52 PM PST
by
Parmy
To: nickcarraway
Why didnt he go to prison?I wonder....just wondering...what the chances are that this unnamed Lt. is of Arabic descent, to put it politely. Abuse of children is a cultural thing in some of those circles.
27
posted on
12/10/2013 12:18:25 PM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority...")
To: Parmy
I’m not so sure this is not an islamic family.
Click the link to the Pilot article. They have a picture of one of the child victims. Not enough to tell us definitely one way or the other, but....
28
posted on
12/10/2013 12:19:35 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Doogle
Read the whole story. The guy may very well be guilty, but the article is way biased. No numbers to compare this problem with the civilian world. The kids have a ton of problems. In the olden days this article would be called “Yellow Journalism”. The article wasn’t written as news to inform the public. It was written as propaganda to sway people’s opinions.
29
posted on
12/10/2013 12:20:28 PM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Responsibility2nd
convicted of sexually molesting a child, get put to death, period!
To: onedoug
...hey, he recruited snitches to go into the Air Force Academy.....won’t put it past him. ANYTHING, anything to destroy what the US citizen admires.
31
posted on
12/10/2013 12:21:37 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
A picture doesn't always tell us a thousand words, but...
1 of 4 photos:
An unidentified child - and one of the subjects of the story - has her portrait made Monday, Dec. 2, 2013, at the...
32
posted on
12/10/2013 12:23:28 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Exactly the kind of people Obama wants in his military and government.
They become beholden to him and he knows they will do almost anything.
33
posted on
12/10/2013 12:23:45 PM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Orwell: There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.)
To: Drew68
You make a valid point.
The original accusation came during apparently contentious divorce proceedings, and was made by his wife (now, former wife).
There is definitely a chance the guy did not do what he is accused of doing.
However, I cannot understand why anyone would admit to something so heinous if the accusations were completely without merit.
34
posted on
12/10/2013 12:25:31 PM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
To: drypowder
That’s the problem, no? He wasn’t convicted of anything. Not even criminally charged, as far as I can tell from the article. Just a bureaucratic designation by a social worker(s). Do you want the pencil pushers in charge of this stuff? I don’t. I wonder why no criminal charges were filed.
35
posted on
12/10/2013 12:26:09 PM PST
by
Wolfie
To: blueunicorn6
You read the whole story. Propaganda? Really?
And read the links within the article. This article has facts and figures to back up the numbers.
36
posted on
12/10/2013 12:26:15 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: blueunicorn6
No numbers to compare this problem with the civilian world. So what's your point? If enough creeps are doing it in the civilian world, that makes it OK for Lt. ChildRapist to do it? Gimme a break.
I don't care what the numbers you speak of are.
Officers in our Armed Forces are expected to maintain a higher standard. This POS admitted his crime.
Castrate him.
37
posted on
12/10/2013 12:30:13 PM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority...")
To: clintonh8r
Have you ever read a book by Anthony Burgess called “The Wanting Seed”?
It’s a “bleak future” novel which covers pretty much every item on your list. It’s a reasonably short book, and an easy read. I highly recommend it.
38
posted on
12/10/2013 12:30:38 PM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
To: Responsibility2nd
So what if he did plead down? By his own admission - HE IS GUILTY and should be doing hard time as of now.Child protective services can't throw people in jail. He was never charged with a criminal act by the Navy or civilian law enforcement. Both organizations investigated the incident. The Navy cleared him of wrongdoing while Virginia Beach city police declined to prosecute due to insufficient evidence.
Proving a criminal case requires a higher standard of proof than the one used by the child protection agencies. Prosecutors must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
39
posted on
12/10/2013 12:31:19 PM PST
by
Drew68
To: Wolfie; WayneS
Post 16 is very telling. I think he plea-bargained. Down from a level 1 sex abuse charge to a level 2. And if he plead guilty to level 2, then they would forego criminal charges.
Just speculation on my part.
But one thing is clear. PROVING these charges is next to impossible. So the civillian courts and the Navy itself just plays the hand they’re dealt with and life goes on.
Meanwhile the rape victims live in squalor.
40
posted on
12/10/2013 12:31:20 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson