Posted on 11/21/2013 11:31:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The White House is planning to tweak Obamacare deadlines again to make up for the botched rollout, and the latest move appears to be both practical and politically advantageous. The enrollment period for 2015 is scheduled to start on Oct. 15, but Bloomberg reports that date will be pushed back a month, according to an official from the Department of Health and Human Services who asked to remain anonymous because the decision hasn't been announced. The stated purpose is to give insurers more time to deal with technical problems, analyze the mix of people signing up through the marketplaces (which is particularly important since younger, healthier people are expected to wait until the last minute), and set rates for 2015. And in a happy coincidence for Democrats, enrollment would start 11 days after the midterm elections.
According to Politico, the HHS official described the delay as "good news for consumers, who will have more time to learn about plans before enrolling." Enrollment for 2015 is currently set to run from Oct. 15, 2014 to Dec. 7, 2014, but the change would add an extra week, with sign-ups beginning on Nov. 15, 2014 and ending on Jan. 15, 2015. If premiums shoot up in 2015, it could be disasterous, and Jonathan Gruber, an MIT economist who helped design the law, told Bloomberg, "Its in the nations interest [that insurers] get time to make those decisions."
Plus, as noted by Mike Tuffin, a former insurance industry lobbyist and current managing director of APCO Worldwide's D.C. office, thanks to the month-long delay, "consumers will not see their 2015 premiums until after the midterm elections, instead of immediately before." Tuffin adds, "One doesnt have to be a conspiracy theorist to divine the motive here." And if anyone doesn't see it, Obamacare's opponents should be eager to spell it out.
It’s going to kick their “seats” grandly.
Ah, Dec. It could not happen to a party with a finer history of degrading humanity! Since antebellum times!
Not only is the PPACA not being enforced, he is "changing the law" and encouraging businesses and government agencies - state and federal - to violate law. He is using the bully pulpit to promote criminality.
These decrees are a violation of law, his intimidation of businesses and government agencies, and encouraging others to violate law, are unacceptable. He is a scofflaw.
Impeachment is the remedy.
The lawlessness and chaos must stop.
Oh it will... the private sector already is saying no dice to these Obama games. There’s a limit to its gullibility and it has been reached.
Still they deserve some of the heat for having gone along with the initial foolishness. What IS it that is getting smoked in these insurance company boardrooms? It has to be far worse than marijuana.
Believe me, FRiend, I have been reminding myself CONSTANTLY about God’s sovereignty in these events.
He rules this nation from heaven, and he sees the wickedness happening. I know He will work all of it for His ultimate glory.
Act like it, then.
“Enjoy your tyranny, America.”
Not a godly sentiment.
“Escape your tyranny, America.”
Now that is a godly sentiment.
I think the potential number of new Medicaid enrollees has been seriously underestimated.
ObamaCare planners claim Medicaid will increase by 17 million people over 10 years.
Want to bet, Barack?
Washington state has the best functioning ObamaCare website in the country, we are more prosperous than most states so less Medicaid is needed, and our population is just 2% of the country.
In seven weeks, we have almost 100,000 new Medicaid enrollees!
Extrapolate that to all 50 states, and that would be 5 million new Medicaid enrollees in seven weeks!
And, consider this.
Most people who are willing to go through all the time and effort to sign up for free Medicaid probably have a pre-existing condition that needs treatment.
On January 1, literally millions of new Medicaid enrollees will be calling doctors and trying to get appointments!
That will shut down the whole freaking medical system!
Democrats are like puppies.. the tail wags the democrat..
Each democrat is sooo happy... all licks and tail wagging..
By 2017, I think it goes up to 2% of your income, so it will become a significant cost.
But - the IRS is specifically forbidden to file a civil or criminal lawsuit against any individual who fails to pay the penalty.
The IRS can only subtract your penalty from a tax refund.
If you can arrange your finances each year so as not to have a refund due, the IRS is helpless.
It cannot garnish your wages, put liens on your property, or put you in jail.
Yep, opting out is the only sensible thing to do.
Screw ‘em all.
I agree. IIRC, there are Federal Laws that require companies over a certain size to notify the government there will be large layoffs. It would not surprise me that there are also provisions to do that for things like retirements, benefits, etc.
Regardless, if I were an employer and found out I’d have to cancel insurance for employees, I’d tell them as soon as I found out or could reasonably determine it - DEFINITELY before the 2014 elections.
How can a law be a law, if it is unenforcable?
Did you think of that? I love it. I’d do it. I absolutely would!!
"It is easy to turn an aquarium into fish soup, but hard to turn the fish soup back into an aquarium."-Russian proverb
At this point, no matter what the Obamanistas might try to do, what is going to happen is going to happen. So far, the unintended (?) consequences of Obamacare have mostly been felt by the 10% in the individual insurance market. But about 16% are on Medicare, and 60% are still covered by employer-provided health insurance.
Politically, Obamacare is a brand new disaster for tens of thousands of new people every single day. The Republicans need to keep hammering on this.
(It's taken since WW2, when health insurance began to be provided as an employment benefit, for health insurance to evolve into the CF of Obamacare. 2017 might be a little on the optimistic side.)
who ever didn’t see this coming is a friggin idiot.
Yet.
At least until Obama issues a new dictat.
Cordially,
“Will Congress stand for it? I dont see that they have much choice unless something huge happens in November 2014.”
That depends...We do have precedence for action against the executive branch by Congress in the Reconstruction Acts after the Civil War. Thaddeus Stevens effectively removed the CIC role from President Johnson and put him through a meat grinder. The congress ran the entire government with little interference from the president or the courts until about 1872. I’m not judging this one way or the other but simply pointing out that a president can be taken down by congress.
Why did Congress pass this law if Obama can change it at a whim? Obviously done on purpose because nobody in Congress has the balls to call him on it.
Yes.
I completely agree.
And our Republican leadership will do nothing, as usual.
Oh I understand what you are saying about opting out.
I was speaking to O pushing the enrollment date back past the mid terms so people would still vote Democrat. My point was that there are many people who have been affected already and they already know who are responsible for it so they can not be fooled twice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.