Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept.: Israeli Settlements Are ‘Illegitimate'
CNS News ^ | 11/15/2013 | Patrick Goodnough

Posted on 11/15/2013 8:35:22 AM PST by Rusty0604

Edited on 11/15/2013 9:36:20 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

(CNSNews.com) – Asserting that the United States views Jewish settlements as “illegitimate” does not amount to prejudging the outcome of negotiations aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Thursday.

The U.S. has not recognized the legitimacy of settlements in the disputed territories “for decades,” she told a press briefing.

“Every administration in recent memory has said that the settlements are illegitimate,” Psaki added. “So it’s been a pretty consistent position for quite some time now.”

Some 520,000 Israelis – around seven percent of the total population – live in areas claimed by the Palestinians, including long-established suburbs of east, north and south Jerusalem.

Increasingly often in recent months, Secretary of State John Kerry and State Department officials have made the point about settlement illegitimacy.

Usually, they have attributed the term to “continued” settlement activity – implying active construction work in existing or new settlements. (President Obama used the same term in his 2009 speech in Cairo and again at the United Nations later that year, saying the U.S. “does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.”)

But at a meeting with Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas in Bethlehem last week Kerry dropped the modifier, saying only “we consider now and have always considered the settlements to be illegitimate.”

Asked Thursday about the significance of dropping the word “continued,” Psaki said it was just “an issue of semantics.”

A reporter disagreed. “If you talk about the illegitimacy only of continued settlements, that means that you take no position on existing settlements,” said the Associated Press’ Matt Lee.

“If you have in fact dropped the word ‘continued’ from in front of ‘settlement activity,’ whether you say it’s a policy change or not it has very broad implications. It would appear as though you are toughening your stance and saying that all Israeli settlements are illegitimate

Excerpt, - See more at: CnsNews.com


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts; US: Vermont; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; arkansas; barneyfrank; berniesanders; election2014; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; iran; israel; israelsettlements; johnkerry; lebanon; lurch; massachusetts; newyork; pruneface; taxevasion; vermont; waronterror; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: SJackson

This gets worse and worse. My absolute loathing for this administration has no limit and gets worse daily.


21 posted on 04/17/2016 9:37:22 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The settlements would be illegal (at least in my opinion) if a peace treaty existed between Israel and the Palestinians. But since only an armistice exists between the two parties, Israel is free to establish settlements (within reason, of course) wherever it wants in Judea and Samaria.
22 posted on 04/18/2016 10:50:56 AM PDT by quadrant (1o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: quadrant
A peace treaties exist between Israel and Jordan, which controlled the West Bank and Egypt and Israel, Egypt having controlled Gaza. Israel returned the Sinai, Egypt abandoned Gaza, Jordan abandoned the West Bank. The armistaces, there were three, were signed by Israel and respectively Syria, Jordan and Egypt. No such thing as palestine or palestinians involved, in 1948 the Jewish population were the palestinians. Arab palestinians were invented by Arabs in the early 1960s. It's abandoned territory.

Obviously a treaty between Israel and the Palestinian Authority or the PLO, the representatives of the population per the UN, would make the distinction moot.

23 posted on 04/18/2016 4:09:02 PM PDT by SJackson (Oh my God, she's so beautiful and she's so little!, Huma first impression of Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012

Valerie worked on property, mostly of the slum variety, in Chicago. She knows how to work zoning in Chicago.


24 posted on 04/18/2016 4:10:17 PM PDT by SJackson (Oh my God, she's so beautiful and she's so little!, Huma first impression of Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Agree. The notion that Israel is encroaching on Arab land in Judea and Samaria is absurd
25 posted on 04/20/2016 1:14:51 PM PDT by quadrant (1o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Within the revolving door that is the State Department - how many of these folks give ‘speeches’ in the ME?


26 posted on 04/20/2016 1:15:43 PM PDT by GOPJ (If GOPe rules are rigged to steal votes from citizens it's time to walk away from this party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson