1 posted on
11/08/2013 5:29:29 AM PST by
SJackson
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
2 posted on
11/08/2013 5:30:38 AM PST by
SJackson
(if you want to test a manÂ’s character, give him power A Lincoln)
To: SJackson
Obama’s dogs must be guarding mooch’s wh garden
3 posted on
11/08/2013 5:32:30 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: SJackson
The Saluki, highly praised and much loved Arabian dog
4 posted on
11/08/2013 5:33:06 AM PST by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
To: SJackson
Islamic Dog Hatred & Animal Rights Activists Silence Wait! The muzzie shitbag in the white hut likes dogs slow roasted with a wine reduction. /sarc
5 posted on
11/08/2013 5:42:11 AM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(Who but a TYRANT shoves down another man's throat what he has exempted himself from?)
To: SJackson
Well, that tears it for me.
So in addition to Elvis, Dale Earnhardt and Baby Jesus....they don’t love dogs.
The heathen bast**ds.
Now not in jest....dogs and man have been symbiotic brothers of the hunt and hearth since we both lay curled around the cave fire. This nonsensical hatred shows a blackness of the soul and contravention of natural law that is inconceivable to me.
However, maybe. Just maybe I can overlook this theological flaw in their religion if Mohammed felt the same way about cats. :->
To: SJackson
Dogs can sense evil in people ergo Muslims do not like them.
To: SJackson
I’ve known a few muslims and a bunch of dogs. I prefer the company of dogs by a lot. They’re more honest and loyal and much more trustworthy.
Smell better too.
9 posted on
11/08/2013 5:50:42 AM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: SJackson
Well, now. Maybe that explains the six figure dog walker/groomer positions (scrub the puppy every day), and the separate air accommodations for the "first dog", no doubt excused as "utilitarian" by the imam for the purposes of hoodwinking the infidels.
10 posted on
11/08/2013 5:56:58 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: SJackson
Animal rights, civil rights, environmentalism, workers’ rights, gay rights, immigration reform, womens’ rights-are all causes the left uses to recruit useful idiots to acquire the only thing it really cares about....power.
11 posted on
11/08/2013 6:12:34 AM PST by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: SJackson
The true goal of “animal rights activism” is to equate humans with animals, negating the special status of humans as being made in God’s image.
Muslims are on the same side, at the most basic level, of being opposed to the one true and living God.
12 posted on
11/08/2013 6:14:54 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: SJackson
It is, indeed, curious that the animal rights activists, the “gay rights” crowd and the radical feminists are absolutely mum when it comes to Muslim outrages and atrocities.
To: SJackson
Islam is illogical, nonsensical, cruel and twisted
if you are stuck being Islamic, run!
14 posted on
11/08/2013 6:18:37 AM PST by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: SJackson
Muzzlemen hate dogs because dogs can detect the evil in the moslem.
15 posted on
11/08/2013 6:19:47 AM PST by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
To: SJackson
Islam is a hateful sect of angry people who want to gain control so they can force their beliefs onto the unwitting masses.....just like liberal democrats!!!!
21 posted on
11/08/2013 7:08:11 AM PST by
ontap
To: SJackson
...not being considered racist or Islamophobic is more important for all of them.
This has nothing to do with it. All of the political correctness about Islamophobia, racism, etc. is nothing more than a disingenuous layer of social engineering to cover the active fear of being beheaded by the next-in-line opportunist jihadist.
"...when people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse." (Osama bin Laden)
When you see someone speaking about Islamophobia and racism, it is a false cover for the active fear of being savagely torn apart by butchers with knives. When you see an Islamist speaking of Islamophobia and racism, it is a thinly veiled reminder that terror of the mujahideen should not be forgotten.
In our modern world we often forget that the expression "spread by the sword" really does mean what it says - the word "sword" is not a gentle euphemism.
Violent murder of the defiant in order convert the reluctant is extraordinarily effective. Pour encourager les autres is not an amusing archaic thing of the past.
It works, and extremely well. Beheading videos are not disseminated by jihadists for entertainment or because they are bored with nothing better to do. It is a flag of war, and a declaration of intent no different in nature than Hitler's speech at the Reichstag in 1941.
"But surely you cannot compare Islam, a peaceful religion, to Nazism!"
Distinction without a difference. One's methods betray one's nature.
To: SJackson
“In the light of these Ahaadith and other narrations it is not permissible to keep dogs as pets. The household is deprived of the Mercy of Allah Taãla.
Guess they have a problem in the Whitehouse.
To: SJackson
Jibraeel (Álayhi Salaam) said that we, the group of Angels do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or pictures.So is this kind on like garlic for keeping Muslim vampires out of the house?
25 posted on
11/08/2013 9:48:43 AM PST by
tophat9000
(Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson