Posted on 11/08/2013 2:19:31 AM PST by iowamark
It’s going to take male humility to save the Country. Nothing else.
Single women, no matter how virtuous, identity with whores. Repeat, single women identify with WHORES. Never ask human beings to make much sense. If you guys want to get all self-righteous, quit lusting after whores. See, not so easy, right? Human beings are ultimately fallen, hopeless human beings, and we've done a poor job of bringing up young women as we have young men.
Case in point, Rush Limbaugh. He won't believe I love him, but he is a victim . He's a man who only loves a woman with his eyes, not his heart.
So don't be surprised that we've made our daughters into liberals' whores.
When the New Left Communists took over the Dem Party, they were already working hard to destroy the family so they could replace it with The State.
Now they have a generation of single women, primed with feminazi agitprop from the cradle, seeking absolution from responsibility while finding all the security of a real daddy in a Gubmint program (without facing the uncomfortable moral standards a loving father might impose).
They have used every aspect of the media to achieve this, from teevee sitcoms to the classroom.
Can one imagine what the election of 2012 would have looked like ...if what they know now about 0bamacare, had already been their experience.
Democrats should be in utter shame and destroyed by what they have wrought.
And yet...?
How is "male humility" going to fix female voting patterns when said females are the majority of voters?
What is so unusual when many women talk themselves into exhaustion virtually everyday?
“If you guys want to get all self-righteous, quit lusting after whores.”
Most American guys I know who are getting married are marrying traditional foreign women; they are much less “whore-like” than American women. They also have higher expectations of a husband; they don’t want the infantilized man-children from TV, but strong, capable men who can support a family.
“So don’t be surprised that we’ve made our daughters into liberals’ whores.”
I’m just surprised that this demographic enjoys bearing an increasing load of the tax burden, as they forego deductions and exemptions associated with families. They are now simply bachelors as far as the state is concerned.
ping
A huge section of the female electorate support Democrats by wide margins because of a single issue: Abortion.
It is the most Satanic, toxic issue of our day.
It is nothing but Child Sacrifice, and it is one of the things God specifically says that he "Hates."
Deuteronomy 12:31 You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way, for every abominable thing that the Lord hates they have done for their gods, for they even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.
Psalm 106:37-38 They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to the demons; they poured out innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan, and the land was polluted with blood.
Leviticus 18:21 You shall not give any of your children to offer them to Molech, and so profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.
There are 3 sins that only God can truly heal: addiction, homosexuality, and abortion.
Women in this country are drowning in the sin of the millions of children they have murdered - and instead of coping with the guilt, they vote Democrat - who lie to them and tell them that murdering their children was really a virtue.
Women got the right to vote saying they had brains. So it’s up to us guys to teach our daughters to use them and they will turn this problem around in a generation.
How is Chris Christie attracting single women, then? That is the crux to understanding this demographic.
I don’t think Ronald Regan could win in 2016. There is much less external threats like the USSR now. A candidate that does not cater to the single women demographic, is doomed.
I think this is one of the most perceptive articles I've read about this problem. Actually, I think it includes all women, not just single ones, as he suggests, because women instinctively look for something that they have now been taught they can get only from the state: security.
As the ones who are going to bear the children and also be responsible for most of the details of their upbringing, women are biologically pre-programmed, so to speak, to look for security.
Once upon a time, they might have sought security by marrying a man they thought they could trust and trust to provide for their children, or by living within the context of an organization such as a church, that had secure, reliable moral and social standards and could be expected to give them security, emotional stability and at least the possibility of getting help if things didn't work out.
Aside from the goofiness of the author's suggestion to limit voting to married people, it wouldn't help, because some of the most pro-abortion, anti-family people I know are upper middle class married women with children. That's because they too see the state as the provider of all security and all good things, and because now they generally exist outside of a moral and spiritual system, even though their own lives are good, they are afraid that things will fall apart and they look to the state to guarantee their protection.
I do like the author's suggestion that the GOP needs to start making more tear-jerker personal testimony ads, since that is the only thing that seems to resonate with females. There should be ads out there right now about how government intervention in health care has left some particular woman or family without any care at all, has deprived someone of a crucial treatment, etc. and then offer the GOP's suggestions for restructuring the system in such a way that it would again provide security and choice.
We're paying the price for the breakdown of private morality and the private foundations of family life, brought to us by an unholy combination of media and statist-oriented education that has been dominant for decades. But this is a given, and we've got to find a way of appealing to this emotional, fear-driven voting block that goes right to the heart of their concerns and doesn't get into reproaching them or correcting them, but simply offers them other solutions.
Btw, these most non-independent of voters actually think of themselves as being very independent and individualistic, so appealing to "choice" in the right way might also have an impact on them (choice about healthcare, for example). But the appeal has got to be personal and emotional. Perhaps that's why Chris Christie (whom I don't like, personally) has been so successful.
“Single women, no matter how virtuous, identity with whores. Repeat, single women identify with WHORES.”
You may have been generalizing, especially wrt to younger women and those that are liberals (based on the last sentence in your post); however, I take issue with what you say - - I’m a single woman and there is no way on earth that I identify myself with a whore.
I also know my share of men who hanker after foreign poon. And I laugh when they take their “sponsors” for a pile of dough when they’re through.
Yes, and they’re just following the lead of their ideological “father”.
I guess if it doesn’t apply to you, don’t apply it...
The big lie of the left is appealing to both the woman’s base desire to be free of dependency on man and the desire to be taken care of.
Replacing the husband/father with the State promises this.
“Most American guys I know who are getting married are marrying traditional foreign women; they are much less whore-like than American women. They also have higher expectations of a husband; they dont want the infantilized man-children from TV, but strong, capable men who can support a family.”
So, that’s why those of us American born and raised women can’t find a guy? I believe in traditional marriage, don’t want mamby-pamby guy (never have, never will). I would like to find a strong, capable man as well.
Let’s just not go after daughters and women here. If you want to generalize, there are many men that aren’t “all that” either, even though they think they are. The society has in many ways made men much less strong and manly than they were some years ago. Try being a single woman these days and finding a God-loving, constitutional conservative manly-man - - not that easy!
Amen!
Extending your logic (not that I agree with it in the slightest) - as opposed to married women who trade trade sex for security...how?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.