Posted on 11/06/2013 2:09:18 PM PST by Nachum
This whiteboard animation shows what happened when Hitler lied to get elected and people don't care or pay attention to the lies of their leaders, until they do care...and at that point, it is too late. Parts of this video are narrated by a man who served as a German soldier and a German woman who lived right by the railroad tracks the cattle trains ran on that carried the Jews to their deaths.
Based on Andy Andrews' book, How Do You Kill 11 Million People? Produced by www.thedrawshop.com
This is real, don't be fooled. This is happening.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
ping for later video viewing.
I am currently reading “The Coming of The Third Reich” by Richard J. Evans. He comes across as a liberal and seems to mistake that fact that he is far left, so he refers constantly to Nazi Germany as far right.
In an actual working guideline, Far Right is classified as no government, anarchism, and Far Left is total government control, totalitarianism.
Because people like this author Richard Evans (and the vast majority of people think this way) they think that the fascists hated the communists, then that puts them at opposite ends of the spectrum.
It doesn’t. It makes communism and naziism like brothers who hate each other.
Those of us who Identify with the Tea Party are not anarchists. We simply think there should be less government, and the ways you are obligated to surrender money to the government is flawed, and the way the government handles and spends its money is fatally flawed.
Bottom line, liberals are the Nazis and the communists all jumbled together.
Third Reich: The Rise http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXXc6CSZPfM
Third Reich: The Fall http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjvKz7l_tTs
It is the best documentary I have ever seen about anything, ever.
No Talking Heads, No Analysts, just the German Peoples words at the time.
While no connection is implied today, the fact that you do says volumes about the situation we are in.
No, I wont.
The author attempts to draw a parallel between the rise of Hitler and the apathy that has seemingly overtaken the US and is giving rise to people like Obama and the Clintons.
The difference, as I see it, is that there are many, many people in this country who are fighting to regain traditional values and who are trying to do something. So, it is NOT that many are simply singing hymns louder to drown out the train whistles.
The problem is, and the real difference is, is that the American media have completely sided with the Obamas and Clintons. The corrupt MSM are the ones who are singing the hymns louder and louder to suppress the noise of the train whistles and the train wheels!
The corrupt MSM attacked George Bush every day he was in office with personal viciousness that has never been seen before. The corrupt MSM blew off Bill Clinton and his scandals with ease, poo-poohing any effort to expose Clinton as merely being a hater.
Then, of course, the alarm bells sounded loudly — loudly — with Obama, but the corrupt MSM sang hymns as loud as they could to cover up Obama’s past and who he was. People like Peggy Noonan and Charles Krauthammer (and others) we're totally fooled by Obama. However, many patriots knew exactly who Obama was and worked vigorously against him. Yet the corrupt MSM’s hymn singing was simply too loud for the low-information voter and those on the government dole to hear or care about.
So, yes, singing hymns louder to drown out the train whistles is certainly occurring today, but it is NOT happening by patriots or godly people. It is the left and the corrupt MSM, using their megaphones, who are sing sweet-sounding hymns at the top of their lungs to drown out the trains whistles getting ready to send many to the death camps via Obamacare and other leftist means.
Heartrending. Thank you for posting, Nachum. I’m spamming this one out.
Good luck with it...
They’ll NEED it.
This ain’t Europe.
Thanks for those links, I will postively check them out.
There is no way that I could read this book about the Nazis coming to power without seeing the obvious parallels.
To be honest, it depresses me and scares me. How can one not see the obvious societal, financial and cultural parallels.
excuse me?
most of their skin color was pink just like mine, but not like it matters their is never a good excuse for genocide.
bump
At the Nuremberg trials after World War II, Nazi doctors explicitly cited Holmess opinion in Buck v. Bell as part of their defense.
IIRC, I think this was mentioned in the film “Judgment At Nuremburg”. I remember getting very anxious watching that film. Good stuff, but very hard to watch.
Third Reich: The Rise/The Fall are EXCELLENT. I’ve watched them several times on National Geographic.
The only thing between us and the _______ (fill in the blank) getting thrown into ovens is the 2nd Amendment.
Mark
???
I just wanted to warn of the Temptation of certain Groups of Knocking off other groups of people because of personal prejudice.
That thinking always come back in a horrible way.
Just marking the thread for future references. Sorry about confusing you.
10-4! No prob!
I thought maybe “Mark” was a movie about the Nazi takeover of Germany.
I thought it was something along those lines when I saw the two question marks and realized that I should have elaborated more.
:)
Bump
Communists and National Socialists are indeed both varieties of socialism, both economically and culturally. However, there are two important distinctions between Communists and National Socialists.
1) Communists have an internationalist worldview. National Socialists have a nationalistic worldview. National Socialism’s inherent racism made it distinctly evil; Communism’s internationalism made it distinctly dangerous to liberty everywhere.
2) Communism’s utopian end-state was a communist anarchy wherein the altruistic New Soviet Man existed for the good of the Proletariat; National Socialism’s utopian end-state was a totalitarian Reich, commanded by a wise Fuhrer, wherein the altruistic Aryan Man existed for the good of the Reich. Both are dreadful and perverse objectives to anyone who values liberty, but their differences would obtain different social policies and different types of evil.
Only if one accepts that all states are socialist to one degree or another, the left/right model does serve to distinguish between these two distinctions. Most Americans have been indoctrinated to view the political spectrum in this way, and thus value being in the middle. After all, nobody in his right mind wants an Auschwitz or a gulag. Modern progressives thus present themselves as a kinder, gentler sort of socialist, a middle-way that avoids the tragedy and excess of Communism and National Socialism. Using this model, liberals successfully moved the “middle” ever leftward, and painted conservatives as some sort of fascist. Of course, it’s a totally bogus model, but it has been a successful propaganda and indoctrination tool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.