Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz says he is a US citizen 'by birth' despite being born in Canada
FOXNEWS.com ^ | October 28, 2013 | unknown

Posted on 10/29/2013 9:02:51 AM PDT by txrangerette

Cruz said in an interview with Fusion that because his mother is an American citizen he is a citizen as well.

"I was a U.S. Citizen by birth and beyond that I'm going to leave it to others to worry about...legal consequences", he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; birferism; birth; certifigate; citizen; cruz; doublestandard; election2014; election2016; gettedcruz; mother; naturalborncitizen; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,041-1,042 next last
To: LonelyCon
But only if his mother was physically present in the US for ten years - including five years after age 14 - before his birth.

His mother was born in DE in 1935. She graduated from college in TX in 1956.

Cruz was born in 1970 and his father met his mother in New Orleans after his first marriage broke up some time after 1960.

Only after his parents married did they move to Calgary together.

So if his mother was 14 in 1949 and did not move to Canada until some time after 1960 - which is apparently the case - there is no legal dispute.

81 posted on 10/29/2013 10:47:35 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
What do you think it should be? I'm of the opinion that the Constitution should have the meaning that our Founders intended. If settled law disagrees with that, then settled law is wrong and should be changed.

What I think or what you think is immaterial in this discussion. What is of importance is the current state of applicable US Law, and nothing in the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Law, or Supreme Court Ruling supports the contention of those pushing the idea that to be eligible to be President of the U.S. you need two citizen parents at the time of birth.

There are more important battles to fight.

This a time-wasting worthless fight.
82 posted on 10/29/2013 10:48:19 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2
"This is like saying a father has no bearing as to birth status. I don’t believe a father can be taken out of the birth status."

Maybe you should read the law more. Here, try reading this:

8 U.S.C. § 1401 : US Code - Section 1401: Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

Actually READ the law instead of spouting what you *THINK* it says. Don't be afraid. It is written in plain English. No fancy Latin, no fancy wording, just plain old English that a 6th grader can read.

I just handed you and everyone reading this post the link to the actual law, yet, we'll still get a bunch of morons claiming things not in law as they will not take the time to read it. People who do that are no better than any liberal claiming crap they know nothing about. In my book, that makes them liberals.

83 posted on 10/29/2013 10:48:52 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; PghBaldy

Cruz would otherwise appear to be the correct candidate at a very important moment in our history. Most of us are prepared to accept that his intentions for our country are beyond any reasonable question.

The very real risk is that someday in the future it will be said that “there is valid precedence on both sides of the political spectrum” that NBC status can be acquired on the basis of one parent being a US citizen, regardless of place of birth.

Think about the possibilities that offers and then also think about how our nation has drifted politically in the past 60 years.


84 posted on 10/29/2013 10:53:45 AM PDT by frog in a pot ("To each according to his need..." -from a guy who never had a real job and couldn't feed his family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

There is nothing stopping Arnold from RUNNING for President. He can’t actually assume the Office but he can run.


85 posted on 10/29/2013 10:54:11 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Government: Slimy used car salesmen writing laws forcing you to buy their cars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Not according to Minor v. Happersett...

Cruz is eligible because Obama was elected. Argument ends there. If I refute the fact that Obama was not elected then I can refute Cruz is ineligible. I can’t refute that Obama was elected.

The electorate has lowerd the Constitutional bar. Simple.


86 posted on 10/29/2013 10:55:26 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

It’s not about whether he is or isn’t so much as that *any time at all* is dedicated to discussing/explaining it. This will be like gum on the sole of a shoe. It’s truly unfortunate. And not fair.


87 posted on 10/29/2013 10:56:26 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Yeah. Cruz came from Canada. Obama came from Hell. Cruz is much more eligible.


88 posted on 10/29/2013 10:57:54 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("A hyphenated American is not an American at all." Teddy Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Here’s the actual law: 

“A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child’s birth. (For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship .

cruz’s mommy meets this requirement. Bammys mommy doesn’t........


89 posted on 10/29/2013 10:58:54 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
SoConPubbie said: "This a time-wasting worthless fight."

I disagree.

The Supreme Court Miller decision was "settled law" for about 70 years, with judges declaring that the right to keep and bear arms was a "collective right" of the organized Militia. This settled law was set straight by the Heller decision.

If the Founders had meant to allow a person who has only one citizen parent to be President, they could easily have said that.

Others have posted on this very thread the statute which discussed the circumstances under which a woman could pass on U.S. citizenship to her child. Statutory arrangements regarding citizenship are proof, as far as I am concerned, that the citizenship in question could never have been considered "natural born".

90 posted on 10/29/2013 11:00:03 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Cruz should run so that if the supreme court rules him ineligble it would nullify every obama decision made as potus......


91 posted on 10/29/2013 11:00:49 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Fat is we really do not know where Obama was born for sure.


92 posted on 10/29/2013 11:01:16 AM PDT by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
If the Founders had meant to allow a person who has only one citizen parent to be President, they could easily have said that.

If the Founders, inclusive, not individually, had meant that to be Natural Born required two citizen parents, they would have written it into either the U.S. Constitution, or U.S. Law.

It is not the U.S. Constitution, it is not in U.S. Law, it has not been affirmed by any U.S. Supreme Court ruling, therefore, legally, Ted Cruz is completely eligible to be President of the United States.
93 posted on 10/29/2013 11:03:36 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

They only lowered the bar for natural born citizen for Democrats. You can expect the bar to be as high as possible when applied to a Tea Party hero.

Isn’t it obvious that the Democrats and GOPe only apply the law when it is to their advantage?

Selective enforcement is how the Democrats maintain their unfair advantage over us law biding folks.


94 posted on 10/29/2013 11:04:02 AM PDT by helpfulresearcher (Socialism is just like any other form of corruption, except that it is perpetrated by a mob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Not according to Minor v. Happersett

You misread the finding.

The court found that the Constitution does not specify, but that Minor was a natural born citizen under any possible definition because she was born on US soil to US citizen parents.

The case did not attempt to define "natural born" - it only opined that Minor's natural citizenship was unassailable.

Cruz is eligible because Obama was elected.

Incorrect. Cruz is eligible because he is a natural born citizen of the United States.

95 posted on 10/29/2013 11:04:11 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Yes, it is, and you make my point for me.

On the one hand we have Ted Kennedy killing a woman, and on the other we have, say, my cousin Dan, a brilliant economist who has, say, an unpaid traffic ticket for speeding and going through a red light. Except Dan is conservative.

They will never stop talking about Dan’s recklessness and irresponsibility during his entire campaign. Welcome to the world we live in.


96 posted on 10/29/2013 11:09:44 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Cruz is certainly as eligible as the loser we have now.

As evidenced by the fact that we got this info about Cruz from Obama guard dog Fx News, as I have mentioned elsewhere, I will support whichever "conservative" candidate that Fx selects as Republican presidential nominee. (I know nomination process isn't supposed to work that way but ...)

97 posted on 10/29/2013 11:10:10 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon

Yep with sunglasses he looks like Roy Orbison and without sunglasses he looks alot like Joe McCarthy, which whom I believe he was RIGHT all along.

Now I just need to know since Ted is a good debater is he good with a guitar? =)


98 posted on 10/29/2013 11:12:03 AM PDT by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Thanks for this!!! Unarguable.

Where were you for the past couple of days when I had a mob at my throat for saying (a very simplified version) of the same thing?


99 posted on 10/29/2013 11:15:51 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

No. I don’t agree. He’s a natural born US citizen, the meaning of which, clearly, is “born a citizen” except to concern trolls from the democrat side.


100 posted on 10/29/2013 11:16:06 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,041-1,042 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson