Posted on 10/28/2013 11:26:28 PM PDT by ClaytonP
If Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) were to become Speaker again, she would work to pass a sweeping bill that would significantly expand federal childcare benefits. [WATCH VIDEO]
In a sit-down interview in her office in the Capitol, the House minority leader stopped short of predicting that Democrats would regain the lower chamber in the 2014 midterm elections, but she had no hesitation in saying what she would use a majority for.
Pelosi and other Democrats have emerged from the shutdown fight with new confidence, and she vowed her party would “of course” pick up seats next year. It is the first time Pelosi has guaranteed that Democrats will cut into the GOP’s majority.
Atop her priority list as Speaker, she said, would be “comprehensive affordable, quality childcare” for working mothers, which she sees as a natural extension of ObamaCare.
“That would have the biggest impact on women, families and … job creation,” Pelosi said. “That was on President Nixon’s desk … in the ’70s, and he vetoed it for cultural or whatever reasons. And now we have to do that again.”
Pelosi, the nation’s first female Speaker, has long fought for progressive legislation on women’s issues, whether at home, in the workforce or in politics.
Of a federal childcare law, she said: “This is the missing link in so many things that we’ve talked about. It is not exhaustive of all the things we want to do or have done with regard to women, but I do think it would unleash the power of women.”
The 73-year-old Pelosi is tight-lipped about her own plans — but, intriguingly, hinted that she might not be around to see her childcare initiative come to fruition.
“I see my role as not having to be there to do it all [or] to see it through,” she said, “but to prepare the way so that whoever’s there can pick up the ball.”
Sources close to Pelosi do not expect her to leave Congress soon, however.
And although the odds are stacked against Democrats taking back the House, the shutdown has boosted Democratic hopes.
“I’ve changed my prediction … from, ‘We’re working to win the House’ to ‘We can win the House,’ ” Pelosi said.
There is also a sense that a popular presidential candidate — Hillary Clinton, for example — could produce a Democratic wave big enough to overcome the challenge of flipping districts drawn to protect incumbents, and propel the party back into the House majority in 2017. Under the Democrats’ dream scenario, Clinton would be sworn in with her party controlling both chambers of Congress.
Pelosi, for one, can barely disguise her delight at the thought of a Hillary Clinton White House. It would align the first female president with the Democrats’ women’s empowerment agenda.
Amid all the speculation, one thing is certain: Pelosi’s control over her caucus is iron-tight, despite prognostications she would lose clout after Republicans won 63 seats and put her in the minority in 2011.
Her sway was on full display in the recent shutdown fight, when she phoned in to one caucus meeting during her 50th wedding anniversary celebration to urge her troops to stick together, despite opposition to the sequester-level spending caps included in the Senate bill to reopen the government.
“It was amazing,” Rep. Xavier Becerra (Calif.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus and a sharp sequester critic, told The Hill. “It wasn’t so much that she wanted us to be at a particular [spending] level, [but] she wanted us to be together so we could then present a clear position to our Republican colleagues.”
Pelosi looks back on the episode from a different angle.
“A month before, members were saying, ‘This is horrible.’ I said, ‘You can say whatever you want about it, but don’t say you’re not going to vote for it,’ ” she recalled with a laugh.
“And that,” she said, “really saved the day.”
The liberals are determined to take children out of the home and put them into government run institutions as early as possible. Why should families who want to have one parent at home raising their children be forced to subsidize those who want childcare? Pelosi is an evil old crone.
Does Madam Pelosi wish to be VP Pelosi?
Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. … from the Manifesto, chapter 2Pelosi sees no need to hide this anymore, does she.
Sucks get taunted by old people.
From pyrrhic victory to pyrrhic victory, the Dems won’t be satisfied until they are ruling over a giant ash heap instead of a country.
Next thing you know they will be picking up the babies at the hospital and taking them to a children’s center where they will remain until they are 26. And jobs? What jobs? She and her ilk won’t create any new jobs because to do so would require that the government go away and that will never happen.
The people are at war with the govt and don’t know it.
Just like she won in 2010! said no one never
This woman is suffering from dementia.
Repeated facelifts and botox injections will do that to you.
The Democrats are good at spending other people's money. Everything should be free for everyone! What a wonderful world!
But to keep costs down, Democrats support aborting babies (free) to avoid responsibility, for convenience, and it is cheaper. It is also cheaper to reduce the life expectancy of the older population.
Why budget when you can borrow and print money and raise taxes! And, of course, you can blame Bush and Republicans for everything that can go wrong when you violate the laws of science, economics, natural law, and common sense.
And you have the low information voter to accept all your claims and vote as told. What a bunch!
And how in the hell are we gonna pay for this Nan? The last remaining folks paying taxes can’t even pay for health insurance now that you made that “Universal”~!
Well said, and all too true.
The “American Whore Association” takes deep umbrage at your comment comparing Representative Pelosi with one of its members.
As punishment “NO TRIX FOR YOU!!”
“But to keep costs down, Democrats support aborting babies (free) to avoid responsibility, for convenience, and it is cheaper. It is also cheaper to reduce the life expectancy of the older population.”
The seminal conundrum for a dem. Do I advocate killing baies for free or Do I draft a plan for free child care? What should I do? (hand wringing, scotch on the rocks, Barry Manilow, etc)
sorry piglosi... the era of satan is ending.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.