Posted on 10/21/2013 8:49:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Did the shutdown do lasting damage to the Republican brand? A new poll from CNN shows some short-term damage, at least, in public perception of the party in reference to control of the House. For the first time since winning the majority in 2010, CNN’s polling shows a majority who disapprove of it, and more than 60% want John Boehner out as Speaker:
Just more than half the public says that it’s bad for the country that the GOP controls the House of Representatives, according to a new national poll conducted after the end of the partial government shutdown.
And the CNN/ORC International survey also indicates that more than six in 10 Americans say that Speaker of the House John Boehner should be replaced.
The poll was conducted Friday through Sunday, just after the end of the 16-day partial federal government shutdown that was caused in part by a push by House conservatives to try and dismantle the health care law, which is President Barack Obama’s signature domestic achievement.
According to the survey, 54% say it’s a bad thing that the GOP controls the House, up 11 points from last December, soon after the 2012 elections when the Republicans kept control of the chamber. Only 38% say it’s a good thing the GOP controls the House, a 13-point dive from the end of last year.
Farther into the piece, we also learn that Barack Obama didn’t fare too well, either. He’s at 44/52 on job approval, which is where he was in this series before the shutdown began. Gallup polling over the weekend has him at 44/50, almost the same, although the Saturday average had him at 42/52. Instead of positioning himself as the adult in the room by encouraging and fostering negotiations, Obama’s job approval eroded significantly in Gallup from 47/46 the week before the shutdown.
Gallup has more bad news for Obama this morning, too. His latest quarterly approval rate fell three points from the previous level. The polling period for the third quarter ended the day before the shutdown:
President Barack Obama averaged a 44.5% job approval rating during his 19th quarter in office, a decline of more than three percentage points from his 18th quarter. That is one of the largest quarter-to-quarter declines of his presidency, behind a nine-point drop in his third quarter and a six-point drop in his 11thquarter.
Most of the days following October 1st gave Obama a lower approval rating than 44.5%, so he’s off to a bad start for Q4.
No one will come out of this unscathed, in other words, but then no one will pay much of a long-term price for it, either. People will remember the shutdown more academically in a few weeks as other stories take precedence in the media, especially with the disaster at HHS in the ObamaCare rollout. This CNN poll lays down a marker with which to compare later polls, and those will focus on more significant long-term issues such as jobs, spending, deficits, and incompetents in the executive branch.
On those issues, Republicans will have an edge — and National Journal’s Michael Hirsh believes that the GOP is already winning on the fiscal fight:
When it comes to policy, it is still the Republicans—that is, the tea party, the GOP’s new beating heart—who are still largely setting the agenda. That’s not about to change. They lost on Obamacare, true enough, and except for a hard-core sub-minority of the tea-party faction, it’s unlikely Republicans will be stupid enough to try to wage that futile fight again. But even with this political setback, the tea partiers have made the sequester and debt-ceiling fights the new normal in Washington, as we will find out again in just a few months when the next deadline is reached.
Indeed, going back to 2010, when the GOP took control of the House, nearly everything has gone or more less the Republicans’ way on fiscal issues—they got the Bush tax cuts locked in (except on the highest earners), government spending reduced, and the sequester imposed. Despite Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s efforts to renegotiate the sequester, Obama in effect has conceded he can live with its across-the-board spending levels: In September, the White House announced it would approve a House Republican spending bill that kept the government funded at current levels as long as language that would defund Obamacare was stripped out.
In a longer time frame, all this must be counted as a victory. Increasingly, the tea party is looking like the Bolsheviks to Boehner’s Mensheviks, with the Democrats playing the role of the wobbly czarist regime (despite Obama’s show of toughness this time around). And if you recall, the Bolsheviks—the most zealous, no-compromise revolutionaries, in other words—were the ones who gained the power in the end. What of the polls and the 2014 election? That’s another reason Democrats are declaring victory, of course. Some are even deliriously sensing a possible takeover of the House. But that’s highly unlikely either, along with the much-hoped-for disappearance of the tea party. Remember: The tea-party adherents in the House just don’t care about the polls. At home, in their scarlet-red districts, they’re still beloved. The only thing most of them worry about is whether they are far-right enough to survive a primary challenge. And as long as the current gerrymandered congressional map remains in place, that’s probably all they’re going to have to worry about.
The Nation’s editorial board reached the same conclusion last week after the end of the shutdown:
Because the deal only includes minor concessions, the Beltway consensus is that it represents a resounding defeat for Republicans, who “surrendered” their original demands to defund or delay Obamacare. In the skirmish of opinion polls, that may be true, for now. But in the war of ideas, the Senate deal is but a stalemate, one made almost entirely on conservative terms. The GOP now goes into budget talks with sequestration as the new baseline, primed to demand longer-term cuts in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. And they still hold the gun of a US default to the nation’s head in the next debt ceiling showdown.
Surrender? Any more “victories” like this and Democrats will end up paying tribute into the GOP’s coffers. …
The GOP may be bearing the brunt of the public’s rage, but anger is also directed at Washington and government generally. Nearly eight in ten say the country is seriously off-track. The Tea Party may be plummeting in public esteem, but it is taking government down with it. There is simply no way to rebuild widely shared prosperity without a government with a clear strategy in the global economy. There is no way to make needed public investments and temper the extreme inequality that threatens our democracy without progressive tax reform. The terms of the Republican “surrender” take us in the wrong direction.
Ahem. The ObamaCare disaster is doing most of the “taking government down with it” work all on its own. The quicker the GOP gets out of the way and allows the public to focus on it, the quicker their poll numbers will rebound, and the faster the big-government project will collapse.
Get nothing out of the debt ceiling fight and lose control of the House. Sounds like normal GOP leadership to me...
“normal GOP leadership” would not be this man, who took nothing from no one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boies_Penrose
What a surprise, the left wing/gay centered CNN has conducted another phony/biased/skewed poll to scare us.
Have to remember...RINOs will pay for their inaction on repealing Obamacare and for their actions undermining the people...all-in-all the GOP will pay dearly, just like Americans generally will.
The public will always, like the beaten spouse who keeps saying “no more”, always have a love for “democracy” and the Democrats.
Until the money runs out and reality hits.
Until the money runs out and reality hits.
a smart group would use this imagery to win elections.....oh, what am I thinking...
They must have polled the same low info voters that re-elected obama
As do I, John Boehner is a compete failure. His collapse on Obamacare proved once again he has no creditably with us leas t of all the democrats.
No speaker of any house can function effectively without such creditably. As scary as the thought of the house GOP keeping him might be, what is scarier still is what is going to happen as a product of basic mathematics.
We have two unsolvable problems:
Problem #1: The U.S. Government is spending more than a trillion dollars more than it can take from us. All this extra spending is financed thou the selling of bonds (taking of loans) which are currently financed by the Federal reserve and foreign investors.
All Federal reserve “loans” are causing more inflation, because they are financed by printing more money. A fact that is injuring the prospect of future foreign ‘investment’ as China noted with a ~$600 loss to existing ‘investors’ in Federal debt due to inflation. As theses investor demand higher interest rates to offset the effects of said inflationary loss the Federal Government will either comply thus raising the cost of financing the existing debt or have the Federal reserve increase inflationary lending further to make up for the loss.
Honestly my money is on the latter with respect to the attitude of Obama’s Federal Reserve appointees that now control the board. That of course means Foreign and domestic ‘investors’ will eventually be forced to divest themselves of Federal Treasuries due to inadequate rates of return, and a guaranteed future of high inflation.
The alternative of course brings us to problem #2 which Ironically leads us back to problem #1:
Problem #2: The U.S. Government’s existing debt of 17 trillion dollars and growing by far exceeds our GDP and were we to ever return to ‘normal’ interest rates we would be unable to finance such debt, certainly not on top of our already existing entitlement spending, thus we are looking at still higher deficits, and ultimately more inflation to finance it.
Short of massive cuts to spending, or gigantically unrealistically economic growth(Far beyond what is reasonable for ‘developed’ country) there is no way out of this spiral.
Fox News claims to be fair and balanced, but refuses to challenge the poll methodology of all polls they announce, including their own.
They should show exactly who is being polled, and show how many times the methodology has been changed since previous attempts.
Especially the Gallup poll, when statements are made that show worst numbers in history of the poll.
Who did they ask the last time etc?
They need to show this with their own poll as well
I didn’t get past “CNN”.
Worst thing that could happen would be for Republicans to bury this opportunity or themselves in the name of getting along with a party that wants you all dead, and yes the GOP are THAT stupid and need many replaced.
National Polls on House Seats are absolutely meaningless. This is an example of “DO A POLL TO MAKE THE NEWS WE WANT” from CNN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.