Disgusting.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; Alia; altura; ...
Two-Party Establishment Nanny State PING!
2 posted on
10/14/2013 5:31:29 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Major brain damage at UMES, but no property damage!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
3 posted on
10/14/2013 5:32:04 PM PDT by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
OK.
That’s how they want to play, then let’s play.
Take over the GOP from the inside. Crucify and destroy anyone who gets in the way. The establishment candidates should be subject to vicious, personal attacks from within the GOP until the establishment is scared of their own party.
4 posted on
10/14/2013 5:33:17 PM PDT by
NVDave
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The traitors grow nervous, I see.
5 posted on
10/14/2013 5:33:44 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If voting for a third party candidate changed anything it would be illegal...
7 posted on
10/14/2013 5:36:53 PM PDT by
null and void
(I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The commie ‘RATS and their “rebranded” GOOBer significant others are starting to get worried. We the People are starting to rise.
8 posted on
10/14/2013 5:37:27 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(The Constitution is obsolete only if you see Mein Kampf or the Communist Manifesto as a replacement.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Weird stuff.
If it wasn’t for the “Green Party”, Gore would have been president.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
How is this legal? I know you can do this kind of crap in the EUSSR, but in America? Banning opposition parties?
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ADemocratNoMore; Akron Al; arbee4bush; agrace; ATOMIC_PUNK; Badeye; ...
Ohio Ping
It’s in this environment that the Ohio State Senate has passed this bill which would essentially eliminate all third party candidates from ballots.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Ohio Senate: “First Amendment? Never heard of it.”
16 posted on
10/14/2013 5:44:17 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Boehner’s fault and state.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The U.S. has become not only a cesspool, but is also quickly transforming into a Fascist state.
Both parties sold us out, and now they protect themselves against the voters by only allowing us to vote for them.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This is nothing new. RepubliCrats have monopolized the ballots for decades. They control the legislatures in the states, and therefore control the rules for access to those ballots. Mustn’t have any REAL choices must we? Too confusing for the plebs.
22 posted on
10/14/2013 5:58:58 PM PDT by
SkiKnee
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The first court challenge will knock that down.
28 posted on
10/14/2013 6:10:53 PM PDT by
TomGuy
(.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Why not just one party? It works for China.
Oh, wait a second...
29 posted on
10/14/2013 6:11:14 PM PDT by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All
More proof that there is no difference between the Dems and GOP. Only a Low Info Voter thinks so
31 posted on
10/14/2013 6:13:28 PM PDT by
SeminoleCounty
(Fact Is: GOPe want ObamaCare.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Sounds like the USSR. You had a choice between communist and communist.
37 posted on
10/14/2013 6:16:40 PM PDT by
virgil
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Seems to me like it’s time for lawsuits.
45 posted on
10/14/2013 6:25:14 PM PDT by
Maceman
(Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Problem with conservative third parties is they are too many saying basically the same thing. The Ohio law may have an unintended good consequence. If forces the conservatives to pool their efforts into one united front. Short term law is bad, but in long run it may have a good effect. Of course the two parties may change the requirement from 3 percent to 12 percent/sarc.
46 posted on
10/14/2013 6:26:40 PM PDT by
Fee
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
62 posted on
10/14/2013 6:48:04 PM PDT by
Java4Jay
(The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson