1 posted on
09/20/2013 6:05:20 AM PDT by
don-o
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Republicanprofessor
2 posted on
09/20/2013 6:05:52 AM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: don-o
What investigation?
What securing of the criminal site?
What attempt to arrest/interrogate/execute the murderers?
What attempt to protect the witnesses?
What attempt to inform Congressional oversight?
NONE. NONE. NONE.
To: don-o
Didn’t I just read a few days ago that the state department has issued a ‘do not investigate’ order in Benghazi .. or something like that ?
4 posted on
09/20/2013 6:08:18 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: don-o
5 posted on
09/20/2013 6:09:05 AM PDT by
seeker41
(take your country back by whatever means necessary)
To: don-o
Jeopardize the FBI probe in what way?
Threaten its ability to run forever without any determination?
6 posted on
09/20/2013 6:09:57 AM PDT by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: don-o
Blow it out your reggie hole obama!
7 posted on
09/20/2013 6:10:38 AM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: don-o
Obama administration says GOP Benghazi subpoenas could 'jeopardize' FBI probe coverup
8 posted on
09/20/2013 6:11:27 AM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
To: don-o
Get on with the probe, the FBI hasn’t been helpful in the last year.
10 posted on
09/20/2013 6:20:03 AM PDT by
DonkeyBonker
(Hard to paddle against the flow of sewage coming out of the White House.)
To: don-o
Yeah riiiiight......finding out WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED that night would Joepardize the "investigation"......yeah...they think we are all STUPID!!
Darrell ISSA.....SUBPOENA HILLARY and COMPANY!!
11 posted on
09/20/2013 6:20:24 AM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: don-o
Oh, puleez! The only thing this administration might be worried about is finding out that O passed out candies and danced when he found out that his buddies had successfully completed their mission in Benghazi.
12 posted on
09/20/2013 6:22:20 AM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: don-o
Benghazi was an act of terrorism against the United States in a lawless foreign country in the middle of a civil war.
The FBI has investigated and found that the responible people are al- Qaeda terrorists and they have been identified personally
This administration has done nothing to arrest the terrorists that the FBI have determined to have commited the crimes.
This is not a law enforcement issue to begin with and to attempt to enforce US criminal law in Libya is not the jobof the FBI nor is it possible.
The FBI investigation is just a smoke screen to distract clueless low information voters and to give the Presidents mob lawyers something to shuck and jive with
13 posted on
09/20/2013 6:22:51 AM PDT by
rdcbn
To: don-o
Oh, yeah. The State Department. That virtual font of credibility.
I wouldn’t believe anything this government says.
14 posted on
09/20/2013 6:27:09 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: don-o
15 posted on
09/20/2013 6:27:41 AM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: don-o
Oh, do they mean the FBI investigation that got run out of Libya?
17 posted on
09/20/2013 6:33:38 AM PDT by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: MestaMachine; Nachum
Benghazi Ping.
18 posted on
09/20/2013 6:45:10 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: don-o
The FBI is part of the executive branch, congress is co-equal and is free to launch their own investigation. If the executive branch can’t deal with it, that’s just tough.
19 posted on
09/20/2013 6:46:04 AM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: don-o
"Law enforcement officials worry that on-the-record testimony could be used by defense attorneys for any alleged attackers to point out discrepancies among the witnesses."On the record testimony? You mean as in depositions? Which any defense lawyer is going to conduct on their own?
And why would such "discrepancies" be seen as inevitable?
More generally, how did we let this "can't comment because of an ongoing investigation" canard get such traction?
20 posted on
09/20/2013 6:49:50 AM PDT by
jim macomber
("Bargained for Exchange" "Art & Part" "A Grave Breach" "Sovereign Order " - www.jamesmacomber.com)
To: don-o
The State Department said Thursday that Republican subpoenas to interview witnesses to the Benghazi terror attack could “jeopardize” the FBI's investigationThere is no danger of an investigation going on now, or anytime in the future.
22 posted on
09/20/2013 6:54:06 AM PDT by
Mark17
(It is every liberal's job to destroy America, and every conservative's job to stop him.)
To: don-o
More cover-up by the gangsters and their willing accomplices in the MSM.
23 posted on
09/20/2013 6:55:03 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: don-o
26 posted on
09/20/2013 7:03:02 AM PDT by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
