I’ve just bought this on Kindle. I always knew this story was bogus.
“It’s just about love!”
When speaking of Matthew Sheppard, always remember Jesse Dirkhising.
So where is this trouble (for the gays) that Sullivan murmurs about? See any?
False witness.
I was in Denver on the dates of several note-worthy events.
I was there for the Matthew Shepard Tragedy,The John Benet Ramsey Murder, the Oaklahoma City Explosion,and, the Columbine Shootings.
Thing is a lot of this stuff is bogus and exploited. The so called ‘civil rights’ movements has ample amounts of this.
The Stonewall riots outside the mob run speakeasy was the “start” of the homosexualist rights movement.
Or maybe it was the faggot Kinsey who got the balls rolling.
"There are valuable reasons for telling certain stories in a certain way at pivotal times, but that doesn’t mean we have to hold on to them once they’ve outlived their usefulness. In his book, Flagrant Conduct, Dale Carpenter, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School, similarly unpicks the notorious case of Lawrence v. Texas, in which the arrest of two men for having sex in their own bedroom became a vehicle for affirming the right of gay couples to have consensual sex in private. Except that the two men were not having sex, and were not even a couple. Yet this non-story, carefully edited and taken all the way to the Supreme Court, changed America."
It is a casual description of the 1984ish media of our nation.
It doesn't matter to them if the facts are true or false; let's assume that they assume them to be false. What matters is that they get the public to act on an agenda before the true facts come out. By that time, it's too late to undo the actions taken in haste.
-PJ
The book will be completely ignored by the mainstream media.
Unless we buy it.
It was a robbery, didn’t the guys confess?
Man, those guys are sad if they can’t get their story straight (is that a pun?).
Still, yeah. It sounds like a wild sex/drug orgy that went “bad” (if there is, hypothetically, a way that wild sex/drug orgies can go “good.”) Maybe the author is exaggerating a little. But a lot of them go gaga (pun again?) over that kind of fantasy.
Let me cut to the chase with no more folderol. These guys, all in such situations, need their Heavenly Father. Deeply. None of their orgies, none of their “ceremonies,” none of their “worship,” in the milieu they are in can do anything but get them more and more and more of Satan.
The deepest Christian vision towards this should not even be “oh how they are polluting our nice society, and the moment we get a chance, off with their heads” but “Lord is there some way to pull them back towards heaven from the brink of hell.”
I boldly assert that the answer in principle is always yes. The acceptance is up to them. Because accepting love, and foremost the love of God, always requires a willing yes, then an unwilling no is tragically possible. However angry screeds and signs that seem to glorify the one writing them more than the Lord who is both offended and grieved by the conduct, are not, I submit, the maximally helpful approach. One sign I saw that at least pointed out that Jesus saves, had some kind of rant about TV on it as well. TV? What does TV have to do with this man mired in Satan’s thrall to homosexual sin? Nothing that I can see. I’d personally suggest signs worded in accordance with a sincere desire to help a person out of sin, with a WEB SITE ADDRESS on them, to which any interested person can then go in whatever privacy he (or she) wishes.