Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Batteries Required: New Wireless Technology May Power Range Of Mobile / Wearable Devices
Forbes ^ | 9/3/2013 | Reuven Cohen

Posted on 09/04/2013 9:39:46 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus

Wearable technology seems to be a hot topic these days. Most of the major technology players have some form of wearable device in the works. Samsung is calling its product line, Galaxy Gear, which they say will encourage “a smarter life.” The hope is that Internet technology will move from being something that is some-what independent of us to something that is literally woven into our daily existence. From your shoes to your shirt, stove to your toilet, the future may be found in connecting every part of our lives. This is sometimes referred to as the “Internet of Things.” Yet a fundamental problem still remains. How to power all these things?

Here’s the question, would you use a “smart watch” if the battery only lasted 10 hours? For me the answer is probably no. But thanks to a new breakthrough from researchers at the University of Washington this problem may soon be a thing of the past.

The researchers have created a new wireless technology they describe as Ambient Backscatter. A UW website explains the concept further, “it transforms existing wireless signals into both a source of power and a communication medium. It enables two battery-free devices to communicate by backscattering existing wireless signals. Backscatter communication is orders of magnitude more power-efficient than traditional radio communication. Further, since it leverages the ambient RF signals that are already around us, it does not require a dedicated power infrastructure as in RFID.”

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hitech; wirelessenergy
Pulling excess energy out of the air and using it. I like it. This could be big....
1 posted on 09/04/2013 9:39:46 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

I for one would not want my toilet to be connected to the Internet.


2 posted on 09/04/2013 9:46:24 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Don't blame me for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Sounds like the film, ‘Minority Report’. I don’t want every facet of my life interwoven into the internet. It’s the ultimate total imprisonment of the individual.


3 posted on 09/04/2013 9:50:04 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Problem is that someone generates that power at cost and will want to recoup some of the cost, when others tap it.


4 posted on 09/04/2013 9:52:20 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

I’m still waiting for a self charging device that utilizes the earth’s magnetic field to create a current within the conductor to sustain itself - the problem is the current capable of being induced is so small... but I’m still tinkering...


5 posted on 09/04/2013 9:55:34 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

How can a device get enough power from airwaves...

I’m sure they’ve figured it out... must have a built-in power amplifier.

Actually, reminds me of Wireless Power Strips.


6 posted on 09/04/2013 10:02:27 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
If it is wireless, our nefarious government, it's corrupt and lawless alphabet agencies along with THEIR "law enforcement" agencies can gain access to and CONTROL of any and ALL of those "wireless" devices for their own necarious purposes. I am reminded of the movie Irobot: " You are experiencing an accident!" Also the technology surreptitiously used in the movie Enemy of the State for the purpose of tracking and framing an inocent man for crimes he did not commit comes to mind.

As for this push to control and spy on the individual and our own populace under the guise of "convenience"... No thanks, they can keep it.

7 posted on 09/04/2013 10:03:34 AM PDT by Jmouse007 (Deliver us from this evil, in Jesus name, amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
I for one would not want my toilet to be connected to the Internet.

Why not? Think of all the wonderful benefits of a talking, observent and snooping toilet...


8 posted on 09/04/2013 10:08:38 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
Wearable technology seems to be a hot topic these days. Most of the major technology players have some form of wearable device in the works.

Considering that our government spooks have compromised all this technology, people are literally being encouraged to put the chains of slavery on.

9 posted on 09/04/2013 10:43:17 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

The toaster from “Red Dwarf” comes to mind.


10 posted on 09/04/2013 10:47:40 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Do you have a cell phone?


11 posted on 09/04/2013 11:29:02 AM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

The ability to provide charging power at a distance is not such a big deal for a device that you wear.

It WOULD be a big deal for a device that could now be permanently implanted inside you.

Imagine a device that you could use to buy and sell stuff, securely attached to you so it could not be lost. You could have a choice of having it implanted in your hand or on your forehead.


12 posted on 09/04/2013 11:54:10 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson