Posted on 08/31/2013 4:39:47 AM PDT by Ed25
Hard to believe he would be this stupid.If in fact it was him.Possibly rebels?
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
The girl who said they will become doctors, lawyers, engineers will soon face the reality of Islam and Sharia. She’ll spend her life in a bag.
The injuries are consistent with chemical burns such as
those from mustard gas etc. The real question that needs
answering and likely will never be answered with certainty is who is actually doing this. I don’t doubt Assad would
resort to these weapons....but I don’t doubt that AQ and the Muslim Brotherhood would use them also....and on any
one convenient in their quest to get Obama to take their side against Assad. And there is the possibility that others may be involved including the CIA and Iran. A lot of s**t is going down in Syria right now and we the people will never get a straight answer on who is doing what to whom and who is helping whom and why.
omg, what horrible reporting. We don’t know but we just report them anyway. What we see are burn victims from normal incendiary weapons yet reports are throwing words like chemical weapons were used by syrian government without evidence
You are right. We may never know the truth, Certainly we cannot take Kerry or Obama’s word for anything.
The crazy thing is if Assad is doing this why is he limiting it , and why attack a school-—attack the fighters.
If I were going to take the rap for unleashing chemical weapons I would unleash them in a winning way, I would unleash a lot of them and I would kill the enemy with them, not attack a school. This just does not seem like a logical thing for Assad to do.
Gas attack? Must be another one of those Benghazi Burritos.
Assad is a bad guy, but I don’t believe he did this or the previous chemical attack. If that is what this actually turns out to be.
Al Qaeda? I can believe that.
Think mo Beslan.
I have "high "\confidence" it was the Rebel Factions.
Exactly. If I have no qualms with using WMD, I would use it against rebel force to do max damage to them. Whats the point of doing it against non-rebel targets? Not even Saddam used it against his own ppl, he used them against the Kurds
Reports are coming in that a government plane flew over the school twice and dropped some sort of device. What type is unclear..
If we find that the rebels were behind the chemiical attacks, will we strike them instead?
One doctor said it looks like Napalm attack
Doubt it - Obama would never attack his brotherhood friends.
Qui bono?????
NOT Bashir OBVIOUSLY. Its the suicidally inclined Al Quaida allies of the Wahhabi sheikdom trying to give Odumbo Obama more “evidence”.
Is napalm a chemical weapon?
Is a fuel-air explosive device a chemical weapon?
Is a white phosphorus round a chemical weapon?
Is riot gas a chemical weapon?
Who is it that gets to decide these things?
If obummer didn’t spout off about his red line, I think these weapons would not have been used by anyone. He put the option of using these weapons on the table by drawing the red line!
I forgot the sarcastic note. Aside from there being no point to this strike, my second question whih we all know answer to, was would we “punish” the rebels if they were behind the chemical weapons attack.
From the looks of the wounds in the video it doesn’t look like Mustard gas, looks more like flash burns. The victims are walking, they can see and they seem to be breathing. From what I’ve read about Mustard gas is it’s a blistering agent and attacks the more moisture prone parts of the body, eyes, armpits, groin and lungs.
Not if they are Sunni Muslims, according to a Freeper on another thread. wish I had bookmarked it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.