Image from ICR article.
Posted on 08/13/2013 8:08:44 AM PDT by fishtank
Hot Mantle Initiated Ocean and Flood Beginnings by Timothy L. Clarey, Ph.D. *
A new discovery may shed light on how the great Flood began. In a paper published in Nature Geoscience, German scientists found evidence suggesting the earth’s mantle was up to 300 degrees Fahrenheit hotter during the initial, formative stages of the Atlantic Ocean—when the continents began to violently pull apart to create it—compared to today.1 Over time, the mantle cooled to current levels.
The scientists studied the composition of oceanic crust using deep-sea drilling core samples and found a systematic change in chemistry from the shoreline—the edge of the continents—to that of the middle of the ocean. The shifts in the core sample’s geologic chemistry were linked to changes in the temperature of the underlying mantle that generated the oceanic crust.
These findings suggest that the initiation of the great Flood began with an anomalously high-temperature mantle beneath the pre-Flood continents. As the continents rifted apart, new ocean crust formed rapidly between them, and molten mantle filled the ever-widening gap, supporting the concept of catastrophic plate tectonics as postulated by creation scientists.2
Today, new ocean crust forms along ocean ridges where continental plates continue to slowly pull apart. The ridges, a system of subsea mountains that run through every ocean, are ridges rather than valleys because the spreading seafloor is hot and constantly rises due to its lower density. The ridge system extends for over 37,000 miles and accounts for about 75 percent of the present volcanic activity on Earth.1
The German scientists also noted that the average ocean ridge today resides at a depth of 1.8 miles below sea level. In contrast, they calculated that the ridges above the hotter mantle in the past would have only been about 0.6 miles below sea level—well over a mile higher!1
What effect would this have had? Shallower ridges from higher heat flow would have raised global sea levels, at least partially accounting for the inundation of the continents during the Flood event. Later, as the mantle progressively cooled, as confirmed by this paper, the ocean ridges would have sunk, dramatically dropping sea level and draining the water off the continents to end the Flood.
In a related article summarizing the recent findings, it was pointed out that “much of the ancient oceanic crust seems to have been generated under conditions that are rare beneath present-day ridges.”3
Rare indeed. The global Flood was a one-time unimaginable event, never to be repeated (Genesis 9:15). The high-mantle heat that apparently initiated the breakup of the pre-Flood continents only occurred once in the past. This heat flow also raised the seafloor ridges and helped flood the land masses. The subsequent cooling of the mantle dropped the ridges and provided a way for the water to drain off the land and back to the deepening ocean basins. Present-day volcanic activity at the ocean ridges is minute compared to the catastrophic formation of oceanic crust during the year-long Flood. It’s amazing how science again and again confirms biblical truth.
References
Brandl, P. A., et al. 2013. High mantle temperatures following rifting caused by continental insulation. Nature Geoscience. 6 (5): 391-394.
Austin, S. A., et al. 1994. Catastrophic Pate Tectonics: A Global Flood Model of Earth History. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism. R. E. Walsh, ed., Pittsburg, PA. Creation Science Fellowship, Inc., p. 609-621.
Langmuir, C. 2013. Older and hotter. Nature Geoscience. 6 (5): 332-333.
* Dr. Clarey is a Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. from the University of Western Michigan.
Cite this article: Clarey, T. 2013. Hot Mantle Initiated Ocean and Flood Beginnings. Acts & Facts. 42 (8): 15.
Image from ICR article.
This totally confuses me to no end. Why are they trying to find a naturalistic cause for a miraculous act of a sovereign God?
The bible says God created the Earth and heavens in seven (or, six, if you don’t count the Sabbath) days, fine. I have no problem imagining that God placed each photon in the Heavens so they appeared to emenate from stars billions of light-years away. Why would anyone expect God to create the universe to look new 7,000 years ago? After all, he didn’t create Adam as a zygote, but as an adult man! If Man can look adult when he is only a day old, why can’t starlight look billions of years old?
The funny thing is ICR writes, “Rocks increasingly older” on this image, instead of “Rocks appear increasingly older.” The notion that the rocks were created in a thousand years is just plain absurd. They appear billions of years old, yet they were made in a day.
1) ICR may not have produced that graphic. Don’t know ...
2) The 2nd and 3rd paragraphs seem to me to suggest that they think the rocks at the edge of oceans really are older than in the middle, but on a much shorter time scale than other folks think.
Well, this would explain what killed the dinosaurs.
God is no less God if the universe is billions of years old.
And it makes formation of heavy elements from one or two generations of previously existing stars mathematically more logical.
And I suspect God likes math too.
God: powerful, but subtle.
Bush's Fault.
Type up a fast and loose summary of a chapter from an undergraduate geology textbook with a pretty cutaway graphic of plate tectconics. Add some quotes from scripture and some verbal arm waving with the word “flood” capitalized throughout to suggest there was exactly one big undisputed flood event (unsupported by geological evidence btw), and Voila, instant creationist article.
When "The Mick" got hot, he really was hot!
The real argument is not between those who believe the universe was created ~6000 years ago over a period of six days and those who believe it was created in a Big Bang 14 billion years ago - literal vs. metaphorical interpretation of Genesis.
The real argument is between those who believe the universe was created by God at some time in the past and those who believe it just somehow willed itself into existence.
Neal Adams has some amazing videos to support theories of a growing planet.
http://www.worldnpa.org/site/2013/01/is-the-earth-expanding-and-even-growing/
Yeah, this is all his fault.
Yeah it really is silly. At least go with something that is fairly well attested geologically, like the inundation of the Black Sea or something.
This chasing after every cataclysmic Deluge seems to be leading us farther and farther afield from the Biblical text, especially since it is admitted by almost everyone that the Sumerian flood story and the Biblical one are describing the same event. I know a localized sediment stratum at Shuruppak or Ur is not exactly the worldwide deluge we were expecting, but isn’t it smarter to just start there?
no second hand smoke killed the dinosaurs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.