Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Edward Snowden A Double Agent?
Disclose TV ^

Posted on 08/01/2013 4:08:45 PM PDT by SteelToe

Several prominent voices in the alternative media are speculating that former CIA analyst and NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden could be a double agent whose revelations are only serving to distract from the much bigger issue of the imminent escalation of the war in Syria.

(Excerpt) Read more at disclose.tv ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; fastandfurious; impeachnow; irs; snowden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last
To: mylife
>>shouldn't that lawlessness result in egregiously unlawful acts/programs?
>
>Possibly. That is why we have oversight committees.

LOL -- That's the funniest thing I've read all day.
(Oversight!? Fast and Furious? Benghazi? The IRS? The NSA? Obamacare's unlawful passage [house vs senate]? USSC unlawfully declaring Obamacare constitutional [Courts have no authority to rewrite law]? — …and that's just off the top of my head.)

61 posted on 08/01/2013 6:11:18 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mylife

That’s an excellent question, and add to it the FZort Hood murderer. But the answer is easy: (1) political correctness, (2) forest and the trees - NSA has been looking at the former, in love with its clever algorithms and humongous ranges of surveillance, while missing the latter, because of #(1).


62 posted on 08/01/2013 6:13:50 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

What do we do?
Demand to tear it to the ground?

Obama would LOVE THAT.


63 posted on 08/01/2013 6:16:12 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

It is a problem that Obama has the Gov stacked from top to bottom with extremists.


64 posted on 08/01/2013 6:17:32 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SteelToe

Caution, gentlemen:

The video is from InfoWars.

Credibility ??? NOT


65 posted on 08/01/2013 6:19:54 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Once a Republic, since then a State in the US, but it is Still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Imagine if you will, what chaos would ensue if someone, started a rumor that you were cheating on your wife, and they sent pictures of you with another woman.

They could be innocent pictures.
Now find a correspondence that has some racy humor in it, perhaps completely innocent.

Trust is gravely damaged.

But does the government deserve this trust?
Has the government had a history of doing unlawful things and then covering for itself?

  1. I seem to recall Murtha declaring guilt of Marines… only to be let-off/protected because he was found to be a government employee.
  2. I seem to recall something about a freezer full of cash.
  3. I seem to recall Waco's it's ok because they were [alleged] pedophiles justification.
  4. I seem to recall that Lon Hiroichi (and superiors) are walking free and clear after a brutal murder.
  5. What about the general non-prosecution of police who perjure themselves?
Which of these is conducive to supporting the underlying assumption you make that government should be trusted?

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." — George Washington
Your arguing that if we really trusted fire we should bring it out to the livingroom floor, instead of keeping it locked away in the fireplace.
66 posted on 08/01/2013 6:20:58 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Obama owns this.

1. How are the activities of the NSA/CSS regulated and who monitors them?

The U.S. Constitution, federal law, executive order, and regulations of the Executive Branch govern NSA’s activities. As a Defense Agency, NSA operates under the authority of the Department of Defense. As a member of the Intelligence Community, NSA also operates under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. NSA/CSS activities are subject to strict scrutiny and oversight both from outside and from within. External bodies such as the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the Department of Defense, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the Department of Justice help ensure that NSA adheres to U.S. laws and regulations that are applicable to the Agency’s activities. Internally, the Office of the Inspector General conducts inspections, audits, and investigations to make certain that NSA/CSS operates with integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness while the Office of the General Counsel provides legal advice. The Office of Compliance ensures the Agency conforms to the standards, policies, and standards under which it operates. Most importantly, each NSA/CSS employee is charged with knowing, understanding, and obeying to the fullest the laws of the nation.


67 posted on 08/01/2013 6:23:00 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Information overload. The computers spit out only the names and info that match preset criteria. There are not enough human agents to then vet those names and info. However, if an op enters a name or SS# or what have you then he gets all the info for that entry and sends the drones or just checks your cell phone to find out where you are right or looks at the set-top-box camera/mic data to see what you were doing last night in front of the TV in your bedroom.


68 posted on 08/01/2013 6:24:58 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Look, I do not know what is going on, but if NSA has a microscope so far up ALL of our kiesters, how is it that the same guys missed the Tsarneav boys why Russia tipped us off to them and they were pretty much working in the open?

Something does not add up.

You're right; it does not add up… and here's why:
The surveillance is not about terrorists, though that's what's used to justify it, but about getting information on the people.

Or, to put it another way: it depends on what your definition of terrorist is.
This administration has made it clear that it considers Constitutionalists, people who oppose abortion, returning veterans as [potential] terrorists.
It's also likely they consider anyone with leadership skills, enough to rally the people challenge them, to be a Supreme Master Terrorist.

It is about control, of you and everyone else. That is why it does not add up.

69 posted on 08/01/2013 6:25:34 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“I believe the revealed documents are out of context, they are not seen within the purview of the entire operation.”

Snowden is at least the 3rd insider who has revealed the same things. Snowden has revealed this to a deeper degree. But you are entitled to your opinion.

“Operatives have been warned off of looking at this stuff which is out of context.”

Again, this is an opinion, but you are entitled.


70 posted on 08/01/2013 6:26:05 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws - Tacituss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Your example is interesting, but in this case the 4th amendment is clear. There MUST be probable cause and a warrant must be issued and it must be specific. Collecting all data about everyone is a violation.


71 posted on 08/01/2013 6:27:06 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws - Tacituss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I agree that this is targeted.
I do not believe they are looking at EVERYONE ALL THE TIME.
It is to much data.

Snowden would have you believe that.

Heck, I cannot keep up with live threads on FR LOL


72 posted on 08/01/2013 6:29:21 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: mylife

The Boston bombing was also used to continue the “spontaneous’ lie.

First they made the claim the 2 terrorist had an attack planned for July 4th then just a couple of days before the Boston attack changed their plans and without any advanced planning carried out the attack in Boston then “spontaneously” planned an attack for NYC.

You’re damn right it doesn’t add up unless you suspend all disbelief.

People are being misled big time.


73 posted on 08/01/2013 6:30:17 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Collecting is probably within the law.
Sifting through it without a warrant could be an issue.

The garbage man picks up plenty of info twice a week.


74 posted on 08/01/2013 6:31:17 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“Collecting is probably within the law.”

Stalking without probable cause.

“The garbage man picks up plenty of info twice a week.”

I don’t believe they collect it, organize it by name, find out who your connections are, look at credit card receipts for everything you spend money on, collect all your pictures, etc. They pick up trash and bury it.


75 posted on 08/01/2013 6:33:48 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws - Tacituss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

I think, JMHO, that Boston was a trial balloon to see if the people would accept martial law.

The people loved it.
Law enforcement got overtime and got to play with cool weapons...

Obama got to crow that he got the bad guy.


76 posted on 08/01/2013 6:33:54 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

If I was running an organization they would not be burying it LOL

Nor would Sherlock Holmes.


77 posted on 08/01/2013 6:35:48 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Several prominent voices in the alternative media are speculating that former CIA analyst and NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden could be a double agent whose revelations are only serving to distract from the much bigger issue of the imminent escalation of the war in Syria.
Or possibly, he's not really in Russia, but completing deliveries on his paper route on Mars. DiscloseTV my ass.


78 posted on 08/01/2013 6:37:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

If you use Credit cards or debit they know where and when you bought what.

I think they can probably track cash with RFID at Points of withdrawal and sales.

You could fill in the gaps on personal transactions by noting where the money went off the trail and where it emerged.

The more off radar transactions, the more difficult it would be to fill the gaps.

All this stuff has always got on.
Until I see proof that this was done without judicial approval, there is nothing here to see.

I KNOW for FACT that Snowden broke espionage laws.


79 posted on 08/01/2013 6:40:50 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Why is it today seems like New World Order shill day? Mindless attacks on Paul on another thread, relentlessly going after Snowden here.

I forgot to add one caveuat to Republicans I will never vote for and that’s the NeoCons calling Snowden a traitor. Bums.

Now as to your argument, I find that you want to believe in your country which is noble, and you think collecting the data much like one collects trash is just fine. Once again why are you not getting the fact that this data can be used to compile a dossier that shows you are a potential threat someday. Gun Owner? Veteran? Posts all the Time on Free Republic? Speaks about the constitution and the Bill of Rights. Put this guy on a watch list.

Heck maybe they can snag your google password and start trading child porn in your name. Silly of course, but is it? You apparently have no regard for your personal effects?

Plus, what kind of massive public spending of tax dollars went into this without even so much as a discussion? Have you no regard for the money you send to DC? What about the Neo-Fascist forced government-corporate partnerships.


80 posted on 08/01/2013 6:43:06 PM PDT by techworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson