Posted on 07/21/2013 5:34:04 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Since Canadian born Ted Cruz has emerged on the scene in Washington as a future presidential candidate for 2016, attention has turned to whether he is Constitutionally eligible for Article 2 Section 1, the presidential qualification clause. This is what we know. Ted Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Many say that disqualifies him to be eligible for the presidency. Enter former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm. She was born in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. I came across an interview she did with Fox News's Chris Wallace in February of 2010. During the interview Wallace brought up the fact that since she was born in Canada, she wasn't eligible to be president. Here is the transcript:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/21/transcript-fox-news-sunday-interview-future-gop/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Fpolitics+%2528Text+-+Politics%2529
"GRANHOLM: No, Im totally focused this year on creating every single job I can until the last moment. December 31st at midnight is when Ill stop. So I have no idea what Im going to do next, but Im not going to run for president. I can tell you that.
WALLACE: Yes, thats true. We should point out Governor Granholm is a Canadian and cannot run for president.
GRANHOLM: Im American. Ive got dual citizenship.
With that said, I went to the biography of Jennifer Granholm and found that she was born to one American citizen and is indeed a dual Citizen who became 'NATURALIZED' as a U.S. Citizen in 1980 at the age of 21. Now this raises a question. How can a naturalized U.S. Citizen become president of the United States?
Continued below.
If the truth is not popular no one should say it?
Which other provision of the Constitution should we throw out or ignore? All of them. If one is ignored then all are ignored.
Anarchy.
I’m appalled at the ‘ends justify the means’ being shown here.
Welcome, Noob!
Thanks for the support little jeramiah. You are correct. The Constitution should always be put first over politics or anything else when it comes to the rule of law. No exceptions period. Sheriff Joe Arpaio believes this too. That is why he wants the Obama eligibility issue to go before a congressional hearing. And by the way for an update. According to Lt. Zullo, Sheriff Joe is now involved and making personal calls to congressmen in D.C. over Obama’s fraudulent documents.
The obvious trolls are the ones obfuscating and posting likes “proving” that 0buttatollah is a NBC. Why not go after them?
Odd.
The well worn “race card” doesn’t work.
These are NOT normal times . We are facing a potential tyranny if Hillary succeeds the current monster in the Oval Office.
If they elect a foreigner who hates America as President,we can and should consider a potential big vote getter who is a rock solid conservative even if his “natural born” status is questionable. Why not? We ran that bastard McCain who was born outside the US and nobody even whimpered.
Im appalled at the ends justify the means being shown here.
How about we elect a REAL constitutional scholar to fix these deficiencies? How about we TRY, and if any secretary of the several states object, we get to ask WHY? Why Cruz but NOT Zero?
Are you not up for a grand experiment? The *left* certainly was.
And you don’t understand why Republicans lose?
No? I think not.
“So the author of this piece can just go sit on it!!!”
Sorry Mr. Sulu....I meant ZULU, I am not going anywhere except to continue my quest to alert to the fact that Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio are all non-natural born Citizens. I prefer someone that the original intent of the founder wanted. A candidate who was born to two U.S. Citizen parents that ensures that person has sole allegiance to the United States of America as president, a person such as Governor Sarah Palin. A true conservative!
According to Lt. Zullo, Sheriff Joe is now involved and making personal calls to congressmen in D.C. over Obamas fraudulent documents.
He’s opening this up, despite all that want to shut this down.
Because they stand for nothing in particular, only “we’re not the other guy”.
They are devoid of principle, as are some posters here.
As some posters here
Obama has spent millions to insulate himself from NBC.
My guy, Cruz, wants debate and answers on NBC.
Obama has spent millions to shut down NBC media coverage.
My guy, Cruz, wants Americans talking about this three years before the ‘16 election.
Obama wishes this would all go away, and has governed with Executive Orders in dodging Congress.
Who is truly exploring NBC here? Cruz or Zero?
Pinging a few names gleaned from the wild and crazy thread to this one.
I don’t see Cruz exploring it at all but dodging it, giving mush-mouthed answers to direct questions.
While I hope it is a tactic, I have my doubts. We will have to wait and see.
Both of Jindal's parents weren't citizens. I think the same goes for Rubio. Cruz had one parent citizen.
A candidate who was born to two U.S. Citizen parents that ensures that person has sole allegiance to the United States of America as president, a person such as Governor Sarah Palin.
Two US citizen parents doesn't ensure allegiance to the US. I refer you to many of of present day pols.
Anyway the issue is really about having one citizen parent or two citizen parents. The Constitution isn't very clear about the meaning of NBC.
Sorry about the formatting. It wasn’t that way in the preview, I don’t know what happened.
I’ll re-format it and re-send via private reply.
“”””You have evidence of Chester Arthur hiding his non citizen Dad? Show it.””””””
I can not remember exactly where but I remember reading several historical accounts on this. As to your request for proof, a simple search will reveal the following. I am sure there is more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.