Posted on 07/20/2013 8:47:39 AM PDT by Bratch
ESPN will reportedly announce next week that it has hired Nate Silver to contribute to Keith Olbermann's new late-night talk show.
The numbers-crunching baseball geek gained national fame when he correctly projected the outcomes of the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. The New York Times, which reported the news on Friday, hired Silver, who brought his FiveThirtyEight franchise with him, in 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
messengers dont become generals
I would love to see ESPN take it in the shorts. NBC sports network just took English league Premier soccer from ESPN and Fox soccer channel. I would love to see ESPN go belly up. I am sick of their Beyond the Lines shows that are homo loving, backing, pushing homo agenda. If it were not for college football I would not watch the pukes. And I am rapidly not watching much of that any more, so ESPN can go to hell for all I care!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ESPN is becoming MSNBC redux. The politically correct slant that the major leagues (in all sports) are taking does nothing to promote sports, and is a thinly veiled attempt at promoting a liberal agenda. Being that ABC / Disney owns ESPN, it is not surprising - they feel the need to use every knife in the drawer to promote the socialist / democrap agenda.
As a conservative radio commentator, Limbaugh encourages conservatives and counters the media lies and Democrat's attempted manipulation of voters perceptions. Limbaugh has been asked to run for office many, many times but he always responds that he can do far more good for conservatives as a popular radio host, heard 15 hours a week with over 15 million listeners, than as a single elected official who would be ignored by the leftmedia - and he's right.
Most sports “journalists” are more PC than MSNBC. And they all hate baseball. Steroids are the greatest scandal since Nixon! NFL dementia doesn’t matter. Let’s talk about Jackie Robinson again ,,,
Olberman really knows baseball and has a sense of humor. So, he’s not all bad. We all know he’ll go berserk, but I’m going to give him a chance.
Attempting to diminish Rush Limbaugh by using the election of Democrats as evidence of his alleged ineffectiveness is specious and the kind of game liberals play when they routinely claim Rush Limbaugh is irrelevant. The left has the media - electronic and print - firmly in it's back pocket, as it were. Limbaugh is one voice with an audience that totals about 12% of the electorate. He can hardly be expected to sway every presidential election or control congressional legislation. His 22 years on network radio, his good ratings and his huge income all testify to his influence. Of course, for those who really believe Rush Limbaugh is ineffectual and irrelevant, they don't have to listen. I'm sure Rush will do fine without them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.