Posted on 07/18/2013 11:13:49 PM PDT by Cindy
EOs are not laws
"Based on these and other data, recommendations for HIV testing and treatment have changed. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force now recommends that clinicians screen all individuals ages 15 to 65 years for HIV, and the Department of Health and Human Services Guidelines for Use of Antiretroviral Agents now recommends offering treatment to all adolescents and adults diagnosed with HIV."
maybe gov funded PP will stop HIV/AIDS infected to go ahead and have unprotected sex with an unawares partner if telling them might deny them sex? They call it a “right”.
Nah... PP will never stop
Ongoing Thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308266/posts
Facts Are Stubborn Things [flag@whitehouse.gov]
WHITEHOUSE.gov ^ | 6:55 AM | Posted by Macon Phillips
Posted on August 4, 2009 3:45:39 PM PDT by Cindy
Does this mean kids in high school will be forced to be tested for HIV?
Let me guess: They’re going to test us on the sly when they take blood for something else, right?
well, I’m old enough to remember when we used to screen every hospital admission for Syphillis: figuring lots of folks will deny doing the dirty (sex or needles) and especially might not tell their partners what they did...
we rarely picked up any “new” cases by the late 1960’s however, since most cases had been treated with penicillin. Indeed, nearly every case was a “false positive” since other infections(ex mononucleosis) and autoimmune diseases (ex Lupus) caused a positive VDRL or RPR: so we had to repeat the test with a more sensitive one.
They dropped that screening in the 1970’s...
Guess this is the same idea.
The only people that have to obey them are employees in departments and agencies under control of the Executive Branch. THEY may try to enforce the EOs, but nowhere does it say you or I have to. I don’t work for Obama, not even.
in order to further strengthen the capacity of the Federal Government to ...
Yep, that's what I want to see, something that 'stengthens the capacity of the federal government' to 'do' something.
Well since they are expecting more cases with everyone getting married
bump
Ping
The feds will issue "guidelines" that doc that accept federal insurance must include HIV tests in what they screen for.
That’s probably true. It’s like that with all carrot and stick government programs. The stranglehold the government has on our schools is solely because of Federal dollars the government provides for various support programs for them. State gets Pre-K babysitting money, school breakfast/lunch funding, and likely many other programs. Likewise for state DOT federal dollars, energy, you name it. It is ubiquitous.
Both state and local bureaucrats become so hooked on that money, they are willing to do virtually anything the government says to keep it. Even if it is a violation of established laws, or the Constitution.
I proudly work against obama and his agenda and for America.
LLS
sound and fury accomplishing nothing but employing queers to go to meetings
This is a travestry. I refuse to be tested for HIV. I’ll shop for an honest doctor if I have to, but I refuse to be associated with AIDS in any way.
I have no “status.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.