Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order -- HIV Care Continuum Initiative
WHITEHOUSE.gov - Office of the Press Secretary ^ | July 15, 2013 | Executive Order signed by Barack Obama

Posted on 07/18/2013 11:13:49 PM PDT by Cindy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/18/2013 11:13:49 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cindy

EOs are not laws


2 posted on 07/18/2013 11:15:02 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
SNIPPET from post no. 1:


"Based on these and other data, recommendations for HIV testing and treatment have changed. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force now recommends that clinicians screen all individuals ages 15 to 65 years for HIV, and the Department of Health and Human Services Guidelines for Use of Antiretroviral Agents now recommends offering treatment to all adolescents and adults diagnosed with HIV."

3 posted on 07/18/2013 11:15:38 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Additional Link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3044752/posts


4 posted on 07/18/2013 11:18:46 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

maybe gov funded PP will stop HIV/AIDS infected to go ahead and have unprotected sex with an unawares partner if telling them might deny them sex? They call it a “right”.

Nah... PP will never stop


5 posted on 07/18/2013 11:20:14 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Ongoing Thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308266/posts

Facts Are Stubborn Things [flag@whitehouse.gov]
WHITEHOUSE.gov ^ | 6:55 AM | Posted by Macon Phillips
Posted on August 4, 2009 3:45:39 PM PDT by Cindy


6 posted on 07/18/2013 11:20:38 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Does this mean kids in high school will be forced to be tested for HIV?


7 posted on 07/18/2013 11:56:33 PM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Let me guess: They’re going to test us on the sly when they take blood for something else, right?


8 posted on 07/18/2013 11:57:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind each blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Here's what I say is going on.. ( REAL REASON )

Under the guise of protecting the public from HIV... This gives the Government legal right to acquire a COMPLETE DNA database on American citizens, as well as LOTS of other pertinent information..
 
I did notice the article DID NOT describe WHAT the test was about or how it will be done.
If I'm not mistaken an HIV test involves the drawing of a blood sample and/or fluids from each individual tested.
 
Look, if the NSA is storing phone calls, emails, tax information, etc why not round it out by YOU unknowingly providing a DNA sample, blood type, and information as to whether you're diseased with HIV or other diseases.
 
If the Government is planning on handling healthcare as a single payer system they'll need such a setup in order to control who gets what from the system.

It can ALL be accomplished in the name of PROTECTING the AMERICAN PUBLIC.

9 posted on 07/19/2013 12:19:34 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

well, I’m old enough to remember when we used to screen every hospital admission for Syphillis: figuring lots of folks will deny doing the dirty (sex or needles) and especially might not tell their partners what they did...

we rarely picked up any “new” cases by the late 1960’s however, since most cases had been treated with penicillin. Indeed, nearly every case was a “false positive” since other infections(ex mononucleosis) and autoimmune diseases (ex Lupus) caused a positive VDRL or RPR: so we had to repeat the test with a more sensitive one.

They dropped that screening in the 1970’s...

Guess this is the same idea.


10 posted on 07/19/2013 1:29:42 AM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The only people that have to obey them are employees in departments and agencies under control of the Executive Branch. THEY may try to enforce the EOs, but nowhere does it say you or I have to. I don’t work for Obama, not even.


11 posted on 07/19/2013 2:42:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor
Here's my 'favorite' part:

in order to further strengthen the capacity of the Federal Government to ...

Yep, that's what I want to see, something that 'stengthens the capacity of the federal government' to 'do' something.

12 posted on 07/19/2013 2:51:18 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Well since they are expecting more cases with everyone getting married


13 posted on 07/19/2013 3:02:15 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

bump


14 posted on 07/19/2013 3:09:41 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Ping


15 posted on 07/19/2013 3:11:27 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
The only people that have to obey them are employees in departments and agencies under control of the Executive Branch. THEY may try to enforce the EOs, but nowhere does it say you or I have to. I don’t work for Obama, not even.

The feds will issue "guidelines" that doc that accept federal insurance must include HIV tests in what they screen for.

16 posted on 07/19/2013 3:30:24 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

That’s probably true. It’s like that with all carrot and stick government programs. The stranglehold the government has on our schools is solely because of Federal dollars the government provides for various support programs for them. State gets Pre-K babysitting money, school breakfast/lunch funding, and likely many other programs. Likewise for state DOT federal dollars, energy, you name it. It is ubiquitous.

Both state and local bureaucrats become so hooked on that money, they are willing to do virtually anything the government says to keep it. Even if it is a violation of established laws, or the Constitution.


17 posted on 07/19/2013 3:51:11 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I proudly work against obama and his agenda and for America.

LLS


18 posted on 07/19/2013 4:28:35 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

sound and fury accomplishing nothing but employing queers to go to meetings


19 posted on 07/19/2013 4:33:14 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

This is a travestry. I refuse to be tested for HIV. I’ll shop for an honest doctor if I have to, but I refuse to be associated with AIDS in any way.

I have no “status.”


20 posted on 07/19/2013 4:49:55 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson