Posted on 07/18/2013 3:37:50 PM PDT by neverdem
What about unrefined sugar?
Sugar in its natural form is typically surrounded by water and fiber (like fruits or sugar cane). This slows absorption and consumption which reduces sugar spikes.
You body can’t tell the difference once absorbed. The difference is how much gets absorbed and how fast.
And fat slows down the absorption rate for both carbs and sugar. This fat-free craze is very unhealthy. Limited fats is good. Fat free is retarded.
“How does the cancer know the difference between processed and unprocessed sugar”?
I used to date a brainless tumor and she knew everything.
So what? How does the cancer know the difference between pure, immediately absorbed sugar and "impure", slowly absorbed?
There needs to be a ban on it. This is unconscionable. We need another Occupy Wall Street to raise awareness.
If you smoke it is good to limit dairy which produces mucus in the lungs that cigarette smoke has an easier time sticking to and giving you problems down the road. The Japanese and Chinese can be heavy smokers and get less lung cancer. Traditionally zero dairy was in their diets. Today they eat small amounts
The author of the article is a moron. The study is about sugar processed by the body, not commercially processed (refined) sugar. Without glucose, you’ll die pretty quick.
Unfortunately it all breaks down to glucose in the blood. The good news is that if your body Ph is high, things cannot use the glucose, but you can.
Cancer is a very interesting issue, worth intensive study should you or someone you know come down with it. From my reading there are many cures for cancer, just no politically correct ones. Different cancers, different cures.
BWAhahahaha.
Very interesting tip! thanks.
/sigh
The sugars we eat are (pretty much) SUCROSE, LACTOSE and FRUCTOSE. All are ‘natural’ and ALL have the same chemical formula whether “processed” or “natural.”
the sugar our bodies REQUIRE is GLUCOSE. An oh by the way, we naturally produce glucose and (gasp) fructose as our bodies naturally metabolize glycogen, glucose (blood sugar) for food energy.
BTW, ALL cells respond to GLUCOSE.
I find this to be suspect overall.
That’s racist!
It is the glucose level. slowly adsorbed sugar does not "sugar spike" your glucose levels like refined sugar does. The "cancer" thrives on glucose, the more glucose the faster it grows. However sugar interferes with the immune function of the body. So if you sugar spike yourself, you not only boost the invading organism but shut down your immune response. Its a double whammy.
If you want to make it a triple hit, get your sugar in a soda pop full of phosphoric acid. The Ph drop in your blood will cause cancer and fungus to go wildly into reproductive mode. The way I heard it explained is that an oxygen breather that dies turns quit acid when they stop breathing. This triggers the latent fungus's to switch into decompose the body mode. It is quite natural, however drinking phosphoric acid is not so natural. It greatly depresses body Ph.
If you have cancer, I would heed this warning. Otherwise, cut back.
That may be so, unless this comes into play.
EXACTLY!
Thanks for amplifying.
I guess I can stop running around yelling, “The sky is falling!”
I get so tired of folks telling me something is better for me because it is “all-natural” and “organic”.
So are belladonna, botulism, cobra venom and poison ivy.
According to my Centrum Silver, I get 50 mcg = 42% chromium every day.
Guess I need to eat more broccoli and get another 11 mcg in 1/2 C.
1 tbsp. of dried basil = 2 mcg and 1 tsp. of dried garlic = 3 mcg.
I think sugar is a stress/depressed override for me. I don’t use sugar in anything
but I have a danish, and semi-sweet chocolate now and then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.