Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Benghazi Index
Posted on 07/18/2013 8:22:17 AM PDT by Timber Rattler
The nation's top military officer tells a Senate committee the Obama administration is deliberating whether to use military power in Syria, where a civil war entering its third year has killed almost 93,000 people.
Army Gen. Martin Dempsey says during congressional testimony Thursday that he has provided President Barack Obama with options for the use of force in Syria.
(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...
Which side?
Damn good question. Probably the wrong one.
Wars and rumor of wars
We'll get the wrong side no matter which one we pick.
Traditional Arab thugocracy vs. Islamist theocratic thugocracy.
Which side?
Terrorists side of course ,Obama is still trying to get his name off the hit list for killing OBL
I think I'm beginning to detect a pattern here
Regardless of his action, non-disclosure forms will need to signed by all parties to the conflict in an Obama action. That way nobody can inform anyone of what’s going on, who’s doing what to who, and who is falsifying, lying, and committing crimes.
“This message came to me concerning Damascus: ‘Look, Damascus will disappear! It will become a heap of ruins...”
— Isaiah 17:1
Wrong side, for sure. And the antiwar presstitutes will cheer their heads off.
McCain and Gramnesty are just itching for it, too.
Why would we go there? If it requires intervention let the other countries in the U.N. sacrifice their young men. Bush bad, Obama good, what a bunch of Bolshevik!
“Woohoo! Another war!!!”
This will be odumbo’s Kosovo — Just like when the rapist and chief slick willy got caught didling the intern and he sent America’s sons and daughters off to fight in kosovo....All hat, no cattle but something shiny for the news to follow while all of odumbo’s scandals simma down in the lead up to the 2014 primary’s and general elections and the right takes back the senate and retains the house.
....cause only the ones started by somebody named Bush are bad...
Well, if they would use force by nuking the country from one end to the other, killing off both sides, that would be acceptable.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Of course it will be the wrong one because there is no right one.
“Probably the wrong one.”
I have not been keeping up with this “conflict.” However, what I have read would indicate that there is NO good side to go with.
I would only be for use of the U.S. military IF the goal was to see the establishment of a non-Islamic state. I am strongly against helping another Islamic state to be established using American blood and money.
And do we know exactly who the targets are?
When will we know when the war is won? How many of their refugees from this Islamic land will we need to admit into the USA? Once we have blown sh** up, how much will US Taxpayers have to pay contractors and corrupt local officials to rebuild the country? Because its Obama’s war, it will be a “good” war, yes?
Option #2) Find a guy who's making a video for You-Tube.
The oath you swear trumps any form you sign. Period.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.