Posted on 07/17/2013 7:38:42 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
On June 17, Barack Obama had one of his most awesome reality TV events of the year when he fired central bank chairman Ben Bernanke on PBS with liberal mope and host Charlie Rose moderating.
“He essentially fired Ben Bernanke on the spot and gave him a fairly tepid testimonial afterward,” said former Fed Governor Laurence Meyer, in an interview on CNBC the next day.
And the bankers have been in revolt ever since.
The government, meanwhile, has revised the economy’s performance downward. The newest do-over by government economists comes three months after they gave the economy one of the strongest readings since 2007.
“The economy grew at a 1.8% annual rate in the first quarter, the government reported Wednesday, well below previous estimates of 2.4% growth and missing forecasts,” reported USAToday.
Still, several voices that had been the strongest advocates for monetary stimulus have suddenly and inexplicably reversed course, saying that the limits of monetary policy to help the economy have been reached.
Left unsaid is that perhaps those limits were reached when Obama fired Bernanke.
For those keeping score at home, monetary policy is the policy that determines how much money is made available in an economy through both the money supply and the availability of credit. More money and lower interest rates, supposedly, equals more growth, so the theory goes.
This is different than fiscal policy, which has to do with how much the government taxes and spends on operations.
Last week the market got spooked because Bernanke, perhaps in reply to Obama’s bonehead handling of the termination of the employment of the Fed head, said that the central bank was revising its monetary benchmarks from a target rate of 6.5 percent unemployment to 7 percent unemployment.
“In this scenario, when [monetary stimulus] ultimately come to an end, the unemployment rate would likely be in the vicinity of 7 percent,” said Bernanke last week according to Reuters, “with solid economic growth supporting further job gains.”
The move is curious given that the Federal Reserve chairman likely knew what we know now: that GDP would be revised downward by 25 percent, from a sluggish 2.4 percent to an anemic 1.8 percent.
It’s tough to create “further jobs gains,” when you can’t even support “solid economic growth.”
Historically, GDP growth is around 3 percent.
Right after Bernanke’s comments, Jaime Caruana, General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements, the central banks’ worldwide central bank, said at the BIS’s annual meeting on June 23rd that central banks around the world had reached the limits of what monetary measures could do to help the economy around the globe.
“More stimulus cannot revive productivity growth or remove the impediments that block a worker from shifting into a promising sector,” said Caruana. “Debt-financed growth masked the downward trend in labor productivity and the large-scale distortion of resource allocation in many economies. Adding more debt will not strengthen the financial sector nor will it reallocate resources needed to return economies to the real growth that authorities and the public both want and expect.”
In short, he told governments to get their act together, promote policies that would restore economic growth- and jobs- while cutting down on government deficits.
“Debt-financed growth has made it easier for authorities to delay the contentious work of removing labor and product market rigidities,” he continued. “The boom masked the need to reform economies even as resource allocation became less and less efficient. And the crisis-motivated macroeconomic stimulus of the past few years has exacerbated these distortions. Hence, progress in labor and product market reforms has been slow.”
I don’t know if Ben Bernanke or Jaime Caruana speak with each other, but one might suppose that since there are probably less than a dozen central bankers who control monetary policy worldwide that perhaps these two most-powerful men might have a working acquaintance with each other.
Into the mix then stepped Jean Claude Trichet, former head of the European Central Bank, who together with Bernanke, created the easy money policies that many central bank advocates feel saved the day during the economic storm of 2008-2009.
And I know that Trichet and Bernanke have more than a working knowledge of each other.
"If [central banks] do too much, then they are only paving the way for the other partners, the governments, the parliament and the private sector, not to do their own job. It's clear that the central bank cannot do everything…. They have their own responsibility but what counts now is really that the structural reforms are made in all major advanced economies, certainly Europe," Trichet told CNBC while defending Bernanke.
Imagine that? Asking politicians to reform their spending policies?
That’s more than a firing offense. That’s fighting words.
It’s possible of course that I am reading too much into this. It’s possible that it’s all just a big coincidence. It’s possible that Obama, the Brat, who has no sensitivities to anyone but himself, just treated Bernanke the way he treats all the menials he is done with.
But it’s far more likely that central banks finally realize, like the rest of us have, that there is no way one can work with Barack Obama.
Imagine that: Obama's "the problem." Glad they figured that out.
And in response, the bank has closed their doors to him.
They should have done that last year.
Over Obama?
SOURCE: CBS NEWS
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57594094/bernanke-fiscal-policy-is-stunting-the-recovery/
Bernanke: Fiscal policy is stunting the recovery
You know that motor that just won’t run because the carb is all gummed up?
You know how you can get it to run for a little bit by spraying starting fluid in the horn?
And you can keep it running by spritzing some more in it as it starts to die?
Well, the can has run out.
Easy money? What easy money? Has your small business tried to get a bank loan in the last 3 years?
Easy money for the Too Big To Fail Banks, “Hunger Games” for the rest of us.
Wall Street is addicted to Ben’s pumping.
It knows its an addict, but it thinks its a functional one and that it will “get off the stuff one day.” It just would hurt too much to do it right now. It thinks that no one notices its “little” problem, while everyone around it can see that it’s loosing control.
That’s probably the best analogy of the year.
I’ve watched hours and hours of the business channel over the past four years. They’ve all commented that this experiment of the Fed....for a short period...probably was wise. But the idea of it being a full eight-year policy to limp the Obama administration up to the end....just is plain stupid. We’ve burned a huge number of bridges and there’s nothing to show for it.
Meanwhile, the forty-odd things that could have been done to prime the US economy and just let it run on it’s own? None of those forty things have been allowed. I think if you could corner the president and ask him six simple economic questions...he’d demonstrate that he knows almost nothing and is just a lap-dog for someone’s policy....just not his.
“Spraying starting fluid in the horn”
Good laugh to start my day.
Just to be clear - “the horn” means the intake of the carburetor.
After five years people are finally starting to understand you can’t fill a pool by dipping water out of the deep end and pouring it in the shallow end.
A Fed chief with cojones and cunning could likely cut Obama down at the knees after something like this.
Which is truly scary for an unelected official when you think of it.
And spilling half of it on the way.
Bernanke and Fed Reserve are agents for the five large Wall Street banks. Will tapering help these bankers? If not, they will replace Bernanke with one that does. Obama and the US gov do not run this country.
Which gets in the distributor...and sets the engine on fire....
Do we have a video link of the firing?
Little barry bastard boy was placed in the White House by the same people he now imagines he has risen above. He will learn better, sooner rather than later.
Did that a few times in my youth
uh... mixing analogies, obviously, can be dangerous.
spilling referred to the buck of WATER out of the deep end and pouring it into the shallow end.
i have been saying this for years now..
the only thing standing between fubo’s planned depression and us is bernanke..
bernankes moves were not designed to stimulate the economy, or to pull us out of recession..
THEY WERE DESIGNED TO PERVENT DEPRESSION..
the only thing that prevented fubo fully enacting the hoover/roosevelt playbook was ben’s refusal to play along..
i have stated that the qe 1,2,3 and 4 were not the worry..
the worry was and is the speed and ferocity of the contraction, which has to come..
bernanke is being extremely careful in this, because the major reason for the depression was a lack of physical dollars ( banks collapsed because of this, no physical cash to pay out to depositors )..
i have also said the first sign of the depression is calling for bernanke’s head...
hold on people, it may get rougher than you ever imagined
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.