These things pop up all the time. Pro-gun names, no members and a board of directors all from the Brady Campaign. It’s way beyond pathetic that they need whole false organizations to force their fascist ideologies down the throats of theoretically free people.
There are a lot of communists out there these days trying to pass themselves off as gun owners, conservatives, Republicans, etc. They must think conservatives are morons who will believe anything you tell them. They’ve got us confused with the morons who support them.
Any list you get your name on is a door to letting them on you might have guns.
Any ‘gun organization’ which stays talking about ‘public safety’ is just a sham to excuse more gun control. Anyone who wants to discuss taking away my rights can go play in traffic.
Subversive. These idiots are just showing that they cannot win the argument of gun control on a fair playing field. So, they chose the dishonest route.
A “sane” alternative to the NRA? Sounds pro gun control to me.
A “non-partisan” gun organization?
That’s like “dry water” - it’s an oxymoron.
With like half a dozen major fake anti-Catholic “Catholic” organizations out there, I’m surprised they didn’t call themselves a “Catholic, Pro-Gun Organization”. Or maybe a “Pro-Life, Catholic, Pro-Gun Organization”. Wait, I’ve got it!
A “TEA PARTY, Pro-Life, Catholic, Pro-Gun Organization”!
With no Tea Party, Pro-Life, Catholic, or Pro-Gun people in their organization.
Fully funded by George Soros and the Tides Foundation, with a grant from the Ford Foundation.
Its hard to be a nonpartisan gun association when one political party is overwhelmingly anti-gun.
The NRA by the way has no position on abortion, spending, affirmative action, military spending, etc. They just push for the 2A, so how is the NRA being partisan, other than standing by the 2A?
What was the giveaway?
A ‘sane’ alternative to the NRA? They’re not crazy enough about liberty.
I’ve never thought the NRA was partisan, other than partisan to, and about, the 2nd Amendment.
Being the “sane” alternative to the NRA implies that they think the NRA is insane. And “public safety” is a euphemism for gun control, plain and simple. Yes, they may be able to fool a few people into joining, but not many.
There are liberal groups that a pro-gun, but this is probably not one of them.
Will end up as The Coffee Party did.
When they’ve been around as long as the NRA and have quality people like the NRA they might eventually be relevant. right now I am perplexed as to why a true believer in the 2nd Amendment would leave the NRA to join this bunch of no bodies. Sure seems fishy on the surface!!!!
The NRA defends the 2nd Amendment passionately and without apology. I have little patience for conservatives who have bought into the line that they’re somehow “too extreme”.
Astroturf ping. Thanks neverdem.
Mr. Galinas we do not “debate” our civil liberties, but we will continue to fight for them, and you better your commie, stinking, @ss out of the way.
Is this the right Gelinas?
“
Contributor
Occupation
Date
Amount
Recipient
GELINAS, ROBERT
VILLANOVA,PA 19085 ATTORNEY 5/23/2012 $500 Obama, Barack
GELINAS, ROBERT A ESQUIRE
PHILADELPHIA,PA 19103 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. GELINAS 8/31/2012 $500 Casey, Bob
GELINAS, ROBERT A ESQUIRE
PHILADELPHIA,PA 19103 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A GELINAS 5/24/2012 $500 Casey, Bob “