Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Secret, Court Vastly Broadens Powers of N.S.A. (almost a parallel Supreme Court)
nytimes ^

Posted on 07/06/2013 9:00:30 PM PDT by chessplayer

The 11-member Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, known as the FISA court, was once mostly focused on approving case-by-case wiretapping orders. But since major changes in legislation and greater judicial oversight of intelligence operations were instituted six years ago, it has quietly become ALMOST A PARALLEL SUPREME COURT, serving as the ultimate arbiter on surveillance issues and delivering opinions that will most likely shape intelligence practices for years to come, the officials said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; eschelon; fastandfurious; fisa; fisacourt; govtabuse; impeachnow; irs; nsa; projectechelon; rapeofliberty; scandals; starchamber; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
Hang that traitor Snowden! sarc/
1 posted on 07/06/2013 9:00:30 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
More than a parallel Supreme Court - more powerful, more sinister - Camera Stellata.



America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi!

Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

2 posted on 07/06/2013 9:05:14 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Remember how the Democrats in congress were constantly making an issue of the FISA court back during the Bush administration?

University librarians lined up to go on the record as refusing to cooperate with the “let us know if anyone is checking out lots of books on bomb making” provision.


3 posted on 07/06/2013 9:11:56 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I catch hell from my friends for not condemning Snowden. 5-6 years ago I would have. I have absolutely no faith in anything that the government says.


4 posted on 07/06/2013 9:12:44 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

A secret court that rules in secret and only hears the government’s side.
This is why we are not a dictatorship. We have openness and accountability.


5 posted on 07/06/2013 9:14:37 PM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

“Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, known as the FISA court”

I did not know this existed. How many of you reading this knew?


6 posted on 07/06/2013 9:15:31 PM PDT by dynachrome (Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I’ve known it for something like 5-10 years already. A long time. It started out they could wiretap mafiosi or do “sneak and peek” searches on such people. Now, it would appear, they have decided that their jurisdiction is a wee bit larger.


7 posted on 07/06/2013 9:18:29 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

“decided that their jurisdiction is a wee bit larger.”

A wee bit of an understatement, there.


8 posted on 07/06/2013 9:20:38 PM PDT by dynachrome (Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Maybe we can have a secret court for each of the other Amendments in the Bill of Rights.

Freedom of speech or religion? We’ve a secret court for that.

Second Amendment? We’ve a secret court for that.

All your rights have been revoked. Don’t like it? There’s a secret court for that.


9 posted on 07/06/2013 9:21:57 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
I did not know this existed. How many of you reading this knew?

Wow! Current events not your strong suit??

10 posted on 07/06/2013 9:26:05 PM PDT by Antoninus II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Another one?


11 posted on 07/06/2013 9:26:52 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Don’t feel bad. Seems the press doesn’t care.

The FISA judges . well, I can’t say it. They’re part and parcel of the destruction of our way of life. That is to say, their existence and decisions are antithetical to natural law. For those of you in Rio Linda, that means freedom.


12 posted on 07/06/2013 9:32:06 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer


13 posted on 07/06/2013 9:32:26 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The Court, unbeknownst to the public, has actually been operating under the legal term for a “wee bit,” which is a “smidgeon”.


14 posted on 07/06/2013 9:34:49 PM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
We have openness and accountability.


15 posted on 07/06/2013 9:35:12 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
I have known of that body for some time. I have appeared before one of the judges of that Court, although not in his capacity as a member of that Court, but sitting as a Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Without going into the gory details of that case, which I cannot due to Rules of Conduct, I will tell you that I would not have my fate resting in that judge's hands.

I perceive no difference between FISA and any other Secret, Unilateral "Court," whether denominated as FISA, Star Chamber, Inquisition, or Tribunal Révolutionnaire.

And I don't buy that one must acquiesce in the erosion of one's God-given rights to maintain "security." In my long lifetime, we have never had "security" - but in my youth we had Freedom. Freedom is all that matters - without it, there is no life, at least for me!



America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi!

Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

16 posted on 07/06/2013 9:40:23 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Court is now in session.


17 posted on 07/06/2013 9:41:14 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Not to mention, this monstrosity of a “court” is likely nowhere to be found in the Constitution! It’s most likely a rubber stamp for .gov and its intelligence services!


18 posted on 07/06/2013 9:41:51 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

You need a wider body of friends. I can’t imagine anyone dumb enough to think we need a FISA to fight terrorism.


19 posted on 07/06/2013 9:43:54 PM PDT by gotribe (Limit The Government's Right To Bear Arms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Read. Joseph. Farrell.

CA....


20 posted on 07/06/2013 9:44:26 PM PDT by Chances Are (Seems I've found that silly grin again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson