Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nevada Family Says Police Occupation of Homes Violated the Third Amendment
Reason.com ^ | Jul. 5, 2013 | Jacob Sullum

Posted on 07/06/2013 1:33:37 AM PDT by DariusBane

Edited on 07/06/2013 3:30:59 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

At 10:45 a.m. defendant Officer Christopher Worley (HPD) contacted plaintiff Anthony Mitchell via his telephone. Worley told plaintiff that police needed to occupy his home in order to gain a "tactical advantage" against the occupant of the neighboring house. Anthony Mitchell told the officer that he did not want to become involved and that he did not want police to enter his residence. Although Worley continued to insist that plaintiff should leave his residence, plaintiff clearly explained that he did not intend to leave his home or to allow police to occupy his home. Worley then ended the phone call.


(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 3rdamendment; thirdamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Another example of law enforcement over-reach and malicious disregard for the Constitution and civil behavior
1 posted on 07/06/2013 1:33:37 AM PDT by DariusBane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

just cops being cops


2 posted on 07/06/2013 1:34:23 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Wow. Just... Wow.


3 posted on 07/06/2013 1:47:10 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Where are they recruiting cops these days—at the methadone clinics?


4 posted on 07/06/2013 1:48:08 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: DariusBane
I hope the law suites ruin the officers and break up their family's.
6 posted on 07/06/2013 1:50:26 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

This is wrong on so many levels.

Not sure the 3rd applies as they are not fed or military but, certainly the 4th, 1st and 5th have been violated.


7 posted on 07/06/2013 1:52:31 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: DariusBane

I once listened to a professor declare that the Bill Of Rights was an outdated document because of all the antiquated notions within it, one of which was a prohibition against soldiers quartering themselves in your home. Gosh, what chance of that happening is there in this modern America we live in, he claimed. That was just some relic from the days of Redcoats taking over country farms and walking off with livestock, he said.

Now look. Police forces are militarized all over the nation and the FedGov’s alphabet agencies are snooping your IMs, chats, emails, snail mail, cell phone data, landlines, and so on. Pretty soon, drones will be following your every move. You never complained about the other rights being violated, so now they’re justified in steamrolling everything else. You’re not a malcontent are you, comrade citizen?

One of the things that ticks me off the most about know-it-all liberals is that when enough time passes that evidence proves them wrong, they’re never around to face the music. I’m sure the professor I listened to all those years ago is probably either justifying the FedGov’s overreach with some new BS or is convincing himself he never said what he did in the first place. That’s just me presuming the old coot is still alive, because he was kind of old twenty years ago when I heard him say it.

All of these citizen safety measures cracking down on the average American citizen to catch a bunch of foreign ‘terrorists’ that the Feds never seem to lay their hands on before they strike, even if the bastards have been living here on welfare for decades and going to school on public funded scholarships.

Gee, I’m starting to get the picture that the government just isn’t telling us the truth. What are they really up to?


9 posted on 07/06/2013 2:05:25 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Demand Common Sense Nut Control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
This is a completely different issue. We were discussing, or at least I was, “DWI checkpoints” in the other thread. You think that means I think cops have unlimited power? Nothing could be further from the truth.
10 posted on 07/06/2013 2:11:06 AM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

“I hope the law suites ruin the officers and break up their family’s.”

But that is exactly the point, nothing will happen to the scum. They will get couple weeks paid vacation for an investigation, maybe get a commendation for service and go about their business. Absolute worse case scenario one guy will resign and move to next town or county for a raise and promotion.

If the populace does not demand and soon the persons responsible for these stupid actions are not held personally responsible (i.e. jail time, never hired as “po-leeceman” again, personal restitution) it will never stop. They will be embolden to point every cop in every town, county or state is automatically labeled as enemy (the king’s man). We have seen this play out before.....


11 posted on 07/06/2013 2:17:04 AM PDT by JParris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
Too bad Mr. Mitchell wasn't "packin' heat." This story would have had a happier ending.

And the cops were trying to gain a "tactical advantage" against someone accused of "domestic violence?" Not accused of "terrorism" or "murder?"

Regards,

12 posted on 07/06/2013 2:23:35 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

We need to be able to get the cops names and home addresses through FOI requests. Cops, like the rest of the government, should live in abject terror of the citizens.


13 posted on 07/06/2013 2:41:10 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Henderson, NV can’t be that big a town (population 260,000+) that the people don’t know who the cops are and where they live. Or look them up in the phone book.

What gets me about this is that these are the same people we expect not to enforce gun confiscation. Huh?

And for all the NSA trolls, FU.


14 posted on 07/06/2013 3:33:23 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
The Jack Boots seem to be getting longer.
MR O has done nothing to stop it.
15 posted on 07/06/2013 3:37:02 AM PDT by DeaconRed (I am sick & tired of the wimpy so called Republicans letting 0 get away with whatever he wants. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
Any thought that a bunch of cops breaking down the door of a neighbor's house might possibly alert the suspect?

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/09/nyregion/metro-news-briefs-connecticut-judge-rules-that-police-can-bar-high-iq-scores.html

16 posted on 07/06/2013 3:48:12 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

...because his IQ was to high...

Just can’t make that one up. Thanks for posting the link.


17 posted on 07/06/2013 3:56:31 AM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
Gee, I’m starting to get the picture
that the government just isn’t telling us the truth.
What are they really up to?
Finally Destroying Freedom, maybe?

18 posted on 07/06/2013 4:36:16 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (We say "low-information" but we mean "low-intelligence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JParris

I once lived in a neighborhood with a lot of drug dealing. There were monthly community meetings with cops as part of the agenda.

Once they built rapport, whenever they need to watch some spot, they were welcomed.

It makes a difference. If we hadn’t known at least some of them personally, it probably wouldn’t have happened.


19 posted on 07/06/2013 4:38:24 AM PDT by Blagden Alley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Cops, like the rest of the government, should live in abject terror of the citizens.

Exactly, a government that doesn’t fear it’s citizens rapidly becomes a corrupt government.


20 posted on 07/06/2013 4:48:16 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson