Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC’s Chris Jansing: Supreme Court Decision A ‘Setback For Civil Rights’
Newsbusters.org ^ | 6-25-2013 | Jeffrey Meyer

Posted on 06/25/2013 9:51:48 AM PDT by servo1969

MSNBC’s penchant for stoking racial animosity in service to a liberal agenda reached a new low on June 25 following the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the Voting Rights Act. Following the decision that Section 4 of the Act was unconstitutional, MSNBC’s Chris Jansing claimed that the ruling was an outright “setback for civil rights.”

That's doubtless a claim that many liberal advocates will make, but is patently irresponsible and biased for an ostensibly objective journalist like Jansing to claim. [See video after jump. MP3 audio here.]

[video]

What section 4 of the VRA did was lay out whole states and counties within certain other states where any change to voting laws needed what is called pre-clearance from the federal Department of Justice. Essentially, before any changes could be made, Washington had to sign off on them. The Supreme Court did not declare pre-clearance of voting law changes unconstitutional, it just said the formulas used under section 4 to determine preclearance is outdated and needs to be rewritten by Congress with new criteria that would better match the present reality, not reflect how things were in the mid-1960s.

What's more, section 2 of the VRA, by which both individuals and the federal government can sue states, "is permanent, applies nationwide, and is not at issue in this case." There's nothing preventing future federal lawsuits about changes in voting laws in the South or anywhere else in the country. The courts are still open to aggrieved parties wishing to sue.

But why let those facts get in the way of a good screed?

In typical Lean Forward fashion, MSNBC brought on entire panel of liberal guests including MSNBC host and liberal activist Al Sharpton to decry the court’s ruling. It was with Sharpton on set that Jansing offered her pronouncement about the Court handing down a "setback for civil rights."

Naturally, Jansing opted to do all of this before actually turning to NBC's senior justice correspondent Pete Williams, who did his level best to inform viewers about what the Court held and to avoid making any value judgments about the decision itself.

A sensible, objective news anchor would seek first and foremost to get the facts straight by going first to the network's Supreme Court correspondent. He or she would then turn to some legal experts, preferably a panel including one who skews conservative and another liberal to give viewers some expert analysis. After that, a panel discussion featuring both liberal and conservative panelists discussing the broader societal and political implications would make sense.

That makes too much sense and bears too much resemblance to journalism to be how MSNBC would operate, however.

See relevant transcript below.

MSNBC

Jansing and Co.

June 25, 2013

10:32 a.m. Eastern

CHRIS JANSING: "I just want to reset. Its 32 minutes past the hour. There has been a major decision from the Supreme Court on the landmark Voting Rights Act and it is a setback for civil rights that basically says that that key provision of the Voting Rights Act cannot be enforced until Congress comes up with a new way of deciding which states and localities and how they will require close federal monitoring of the elections."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: jansing; msnbc; race; scotus
All I know is if MSNBC hates something it must have been the correct decision.
1 posted on 06/25/2013 9:51:48 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I am doing the happy dance!!!!!!


2 posted on 06/25/2013 9:54:41 AM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
civil rights were enumerated in the bill of rights.

if courts understood that, the American people would have been spared the burden of the rest of it.

3 posted on 06/25/2013 9:57:43 AM PDT by schm0e ("we are in the midst of a coup.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I wonder why they are holding back the marriage ruling. Perhaps because they know it is going to be ugly?


4 posted on 06/25/2013 9:58:54 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
MSNBC’s Chris Jansing: Supreme Court Decision A ‘Setback For Civil Rights’

Good. Anybody with a brain can see that these so-called "civil rights" have advanced well beyond a call for equal rights, and instead are a demand for special privileges and state sanctioned discrimination against whites.

5 posted on 06/25/2013 9:59:22 AM PDT by NotYourAverageDhimmi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

6 posted on 06/25/2013 10:01:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Can’t wait for Chris Tingle to weigh in with his poignant analysis.


7 posted on 06/25/2013 10:03:37 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Anything that takes the thumb off the scale is considered “unfair” by libtards.

What a bunch of self-important condescending jerks.


8 posted on 06/25/2013 10:08:54 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (To attempt to have intercourse with a hornet's nest is a very bad idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
>>setback for civil rights<<

No, the inner city thug rapper gang culture is a setback for civil rights.

The black community needs to stop with all the victim hood mentality and cease stereotyping themselves.

Never in the history of society has the black been afforded so much opportunity to attend school and better their communities....for the most part, they've pissed it away.

Sorry, but gotta call it like it is. No one else is to blame. Blacks are no less intelligent than any other race. Get off your drunk, drugged up, social welfare bottom sides and get an education.

Stop layin around all day in the hood over at the prahjeks and get a job....pull your damn pants up first. Go get that gold tooth display outcho mouff, clean up and learn to speak proper English. Nuff wiff ahl dat bonics....mayn.

9 posted on 06/25/2013 10:55:33 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Comrades. I have not so glorious news for you .....
Comrade Chris Jansing, minitrue


10 posted on 06/25/2013 11:20:45 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969; Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

11 posted on 06/25/2013 9:12:25 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson