Brand-new TWA 800 film to finally spill beans? (exposed corruption behind original investigation)

WND ^ | June 19, 2013 | Jack Cashill

[Perseverando]

Seventeen years after the Paris-bound TWA Flight 800 blew up off the coast of Long Island, producers Tom Stalcup and Kristina Borjesson have released a new documentary –simply titled “TWA Flight 800” – that has the very real potential to re-open the investigation into the plane’s destruction.

Kudos, in particular, to Stalcup. A Ph.D. physicist by background, he has dedicated the last 16 years of his life to exposing what is arguably the most flagrant government cover-up in American peacetime history.

Borjesson has likewise been involved from the beginning. As a producer at CBS in 1996 when TWA 800 was destroyed, she sacrificed her future at CBS to get at the truth. Together, they have produced a documentary that is compelling, convincing and, finally, deeply moving.

Jack Cashill and James Sanders exposed the corrupt TWA 800 investigation in their book “First Strike” — get it now at WND’s Superstore

The producers made two strategic moves to force the media to look seriously at their conclusions. One was to rely heavily on the testimony of a half-dozen highly credible whistleblowers from within the investigation.

The second was to avoid politics. When James Sanders and I produced the video documentary “Silenced” on this subject 12 years ago and the book “First Strike” two years after that, we made the marketing mistake of identifying the logic of the cover-up.

That logic led to the White House. Sixteen years ago, in the home stretch of a difficult re-election campaign, Bill Clinton faced a problem very similar to one that Barack Obama would face in 2012. This is something the media did not want to know, let alone share.

An event took place that threatened the “peace and

[SkyDancer]

And I have read engineering reports and watched demonstrations on how it was possible. It is unfortunate that the results were ignored by people like yourself who want to believe that something else happened.

[haole]

having worked on designing all aspects of aircraft, military and commercial, you incorporate every thing you know on how to make planes safe, whether to be able to withstand a 23 mm cannon shell going thru the structure, to allowable crack growth, and fail safety.
the after takedown testing could not show any way for a minimal fuel / vapor in the tank being ignited from a low voltage source, even “arcing”.
to buttress those facts, the tell tale signs of the explosion blowing skin panels inward over the length of damage, force one to realize that the source of the explosion was external to the airframe.
for a limited amount of IQ as you seem to have, even a center tank explosion could not make a 4 ft hole in the forward fuselage, going up and thru the body.

as i said previously, the most credible witness, was a coast guard heli pilot who was flying near, at a lower altitude, when he saw rocket trails come up, and go over, and behind him, then saw the explosion.
you can dream that obama ia actually a good president all you want, but the facts demsonstrate the opposite.

[SkyDancer]

When people have a preconceived idea of a conspiracy plot and there are those that don't buy into it, those people instead of data put out innuendo as to the mental acuity of the person questioning it. It gains more to present evidence and have a meaningful and intelligent conversation than to cast aspersions to wit:

(sic - as you wrote) you can dream that obama ia actually a good president all you want, but the facts demsonstrate the opposite. .