Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Left Loses Big in Citizenship-Verification Supreme Court Case
PJ Media ^ | June 17, 2013 | J. Christian Adams

Posted on 06/17/2013 8:03:34 PM PDT by jazusamo

Something perverse happened after the Supreme Court’s decision today invalidating citizenship-verification requirements in Arizona for registrants who use the federal voter registration form. The Left knows they lost most of the battle, but are still claiming victory. That’s what they do. Election-integrity proponents and the states are saying they lost, but don’t realize they really won.

The Left wins even when they lose, and conservatives are often bewildered and outfoxed in the election-process game.

Earlier today, I called the decision a nothingburger. After re-reading the case and reflecting a bit more, it’s clear that the decision was a disaster for the Left and their victory cackles are hollow — and they know it.

Worse, conservatives dooms-dayers who have never litigated a single National Voter Registration Act case have taken to the airwaves, describing the case as a disaster which invites illegal-alien voting.

In the last year, I’ve litigated five NVRA cases and worked on the preemption issues for years, and there is more to cheer in today’s opinion than there is to bemoan. Those complaining about the opinion don’t understand what the Left’s goal was in this case: total federal preemption. On that score, Justice Scalia foiled them; indeed, the decision today was a huge war won, even if the small Arizona battle was lost.

From my time in the Justice Department Voting Section, I can remember intimately the wars over some of the preemption issues decided today.

The Left essentially believes that anyone who fills out a federal Election Assistance Commission registration form should be allowed on the rolls, no questions asked. There were complex fights over the “citizen check-off box” issues, with the Left wanting the box rendered meaningless, and conservatives and election-integrity proponents believing a registration cannot be processed until a registrant affirms on the box that he or she is a citizen.

Before the decision today, here is what the Left wanted:

● Invalidation of Arizona’s requirement that those submitting a federal form provide proof of citizenship with their federal form. Mind you, the citizenship-proof requirement is NOT part of federal law and the Election Assistance Commission does NOT require it in the form they drafted.

● Invalidation of state citizenship-verification requirements when a state voter registration form is used (yes, such forms exist separate from the federal requirement) on the basis of federal preemption. They wanted the Arizona case to invalidate all state citizenship-verification requirements.

● Automatic registration if a registrant submits a completed federal EAC approved registration form, no questions asked.

● Federal preemption on the ability for states to have customized federal EAC-approved forms that differed from the default EAC form.

● Federal preemption over states, like Florida and Kansas, looking for independent information on citizenship to root out noncitizens from the voter rolls. Again, the Left wanted the federal EAC form to be the no-questions-asked ticket to the voter rolls.

So what is the score on these five goals after Justice Scalia’s opinion today? Election-integrity advocates are batting .800; left wing groups, .200. And the most insignificant issue of the five is the one issue the Left won. Justice Scalia foiled 4 of 5 of their goals, and the 4 biggest ones.

How does it work? The decision today uncorks state power. The Left wanted state power stripped and they lost.

First, Arizona can simply push the state forms in all state offices and online, and keep those federal forms in the back room gathering dust. When you submit a state form, you have to prove citizenship. Thanks to Justice Scalia, that option is perfectly acceptable. Loss for the Left. Victory for election integrity.

You might say, “That’s a small victory.” Nonsense. This was the whole ballgame to the groups pushing the Arizona lawsuit. They lost, period.

Next, when voters use a state, as opposed to a federal, form, they can still be required to prove citizenship. The federal form is irrelevant in that circumstance.

After the decision today, states have a green light to do double- and triple-checking even if a registrant uses the federal form. The Left wanted the submission of a federal form to mean automatic no-questions-asked registration. This is a big loss for the Left because now states can put suspect forms in limbo while they run checks against non-citizen databases and jury-response forms. Another significant victory in today’s decision. The Left wanted to strip them of that double-checking power.

The decision today is a great example of how conservatives can be distracted by squirrels running past. It is understandable and forgivable because they aren’t daily immersed in the long-term election-process agenda of the left-wing groups. Nor do they daily involve themselves with the details of election process. But having been in the “preemption wars” for nearly a decade, I can assure you this case is a big win, even if it doesn’t appear so at first glance.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizona; citizenship; electionfraud; jchristianadams; scalia; scotus; scotusarizona; votefraud; voterfraud; voterid; votingrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: jeffc; Ray76; PieterCasparzen
It doesn't matter if the left distributes federal forms, the state can put them in limbo.

After the decision today, states have a green light to do double- and triple-checking even if a registrant uses the federal form. The Left wanted the submission of a federal form to mean automatic no-questions-asked registration. This is a big loss for the Left because now states can put suspect forms in limbo while they run checks against non-citizen databases and jury-response forms. Another significant victory in today’s decision. The Left wanted to strip them of that double-checking power.

61 posted on 06/17/2013 9:19:51 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
**First, Arizona can simply push the state forms in all state offices and online, and keep those federal forms in the back room gathering dust. When you submit a state form, you have to prove citizenship. Thanks to Justice Scalia, that option is perfectly acceptable. Loss for the Left. Victory for election integrity. **
 
WOW!
 
**After the decision today, states have a green light to do double- and triple-checking even if a registrant uses the federal form.**
 
Double and Triple WOW!

62 posted on 06/17/2013 9:22:15 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

**Put up a camera that snaps photos of those in the Federal line.

Lets see how many people enter the ‘Federal only’ line!**

LOL!


63 posted on 06/17/2013 9:24:38 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Think about what the IRS did to Tea-party 501 apps, they let them sit, then reviewed the apps and sent out numerous nonsense questions


64 posted on 06/17/2013 9:27:14 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; bluecat6

no cameras allowed in polling places I think


65 posted on 06/17/2013 9:27:26 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

BUMP that, Sal! :-)


66 posted on 06/17/2013 9:28:40 PM PDT by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

True, Holder and the Dept of Injustice blocked States from taking dead folks off the voters rolls


67 posted on 06/17/2013 9:29:23 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; metmom; MestaMachine; onyx; DoughtyOne

Important read:

Exerts from article...

The Arizona Scotus decision today ‘uncorks state power’.... The Left wanted state power stripped and they lost.

First,........Arizona can simply push the state forms in all state offices and online, and keep those federal forms in the back room gathering dust...... When you submit a state form, YOU HAVE TO PROVE CITIZENSHIP......Thanks to Justice Scalia, that option is perfectly acceptable.... Loss for the Left..... Victory for election integrity.

You might say,..... “That’s a small victory.”.. Nonsense. This was the whole ballgame to the groups pushing the Arizona lawsuit..... They lost, period.

Next,...... when voters use a state, as opposed to a federal, form, they can still be required to prove citizenship. .....The federal form is irrelevant in that circumstance.

After the decision today, states have a green light to do double- and triple-checking even if a registrant uses the federal form......

..... The Left wanted the submission of a federal form to mean automatic no-questions-asked registration.... This is a big loss for the Left because now states can put suspect forms in limbo while they run checks against non-citizen databases and jury-response forms......

Another significant victory in today’s decision. The Left wanted to strip them of that double-checking power.

The decision today is a great example of how conservatives can be distracted by squirrels running past........... It is understandable and forgivable because they aren’t daily immersed in the long-term election-process agenda of the left-wing groups.........Nor do they daily involve themselves with the details of election process........ But having been in the “preemption wars” for nearly a decade, I can assure you this case is a big win, even if it doesn’t appear so at first glance.


68 posted on 06/17/2013 9:31:53 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nice!


69 posted on 06/17/2013 9:37:49 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This is the dumbest commentary I have ever seen.

The Supreme Court just gave permission for illegal aliens to vote without any restrictions.

Republicans have to be the stupidest people around if they think this was a victory.


70 posted on 06/17/2013 9:37:52 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

This nicely ties in with another article that Cruz spoke of concerning NSA.....not to jump to conclusions....

It’s Obama who used the NSA to mega-collect voter information to win his election...he didn’t need to use it for peoples personal information which can already be obtained by driver’s licsences , ss numbers etc. He needed the data to win the election.

But he has everybody in a tiz about what the NSA knows about them and how they are doing so...thus the attention is off him and the voter fraud he used the NSA for.

We have again....been “squirreled”...took Obamas bait and ran with it...and the media helped....no wonder they were happy to “sell” the story and our outrage....we all were so surprised they were jumping on board...they were once more helping Obama and protecting him.


71 posted on 06/17/2013 9:41:08 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

Thanks for your most informed comment. Do I need a sarc tag?


72 posted on 06/17/2013 9:42:59 PM PDT by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

You may be right. What about on the way in?


73 posted on 06/17/2013 9:52:54 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
...Roberts pulled all four Liberal Justices into supporting a majority opinion that defined - for the first real time since the New Deal iirc - good limits on what the Federal Gvt can do in the face of the 10th Amendment.

The proof is in the pudding. When I see either of these decisions result in some ACTUAL positive results, then I'll believe that it was some super secret, spy-decoder-ring victory for sane Americans. Until then, it's all just some theory that smells an awful lot like trying to find the shiny end of the dog feces.
74 posted on 06/17/2013 10:03:56 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
usually i read this and think “its the GOP trying to make chicken soup out of chicken poop” but this guy seems to know what he’s talking about and has been fighting this fight for a while...

Kinda confusing...If this is so great, why did Alito and Thomas vote against it??? And why did all the Libs support it???

75 posted on 06/17/2013 10:07:44 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“the state can put them in limbo”

What is the origin of this notion?


76 posted on 06/17/2013 10:08:53 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well, I hope that someone tells Michael Savage this “good” news. He was beside himself on his show tonight, saying it was the end of America.


77 posted on 06/17/2013 10:11:55 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Motor Voter was and is the biggest Voter Fraud scheme to ever come down the pike. Clinton really pulled off the biggest scam possible. Only Amnesty will cause more damage.

In all these years, have we seen ONE Non Citizen tried and convicted of Perjury for falsifying the Form in question?

Inquiring minds need to know.


78 posted on 06/17/2013 10:13:43 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Compliance with Tyranny is Treason...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

Of interest PING!


79 posted on 06/17/2013 10:18:42 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

If the claims in this article are correct then there may be some positive practical effect. However: the larger issue remains, which is that the Federal government lacks authority. A State does not have to seek Federal permission for its electoral administrative process. In this respect this ruling is a disaster.

Thomas’ exposition was clear and accurate. A State does not have to seek Federal permission for its electoral administrative process.

It IS the end of America. While the Federal government improperly demands Arizona seek their approval and if denied to seek remedy in court, the real effect is that foreigners will register and will vote.


80 posted on 06/17/2013 10:30:03 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson