Posted on 06/17/2013 8:28:29 AM PDT by Justaham
President Obama is under fire for the price of the first familys upcoming weeklong trip to Africa, which could cost taxpayers as much as $100 million at a time of federal budget cuts and furloughs.
The Obamas trip will take them to Senegal, Tanzania and South Africa from June 26 to July 3. The excursion will involve military cargo planes airlifting 56 support vehicles, including 14 limousines, and three trucks to carry bulletproof glass panels to cover the windows where the family is set to stay.
One estimate of the cost has pegged the bill to U.S. taxpayers at somewhere between $60 million and $100 million.
A House lawmaker said rather than spend $100 million on a trip to Africa, the administration should instead fund public tours of the White House that were canceled under the sequestration budget cuts.
For the cost of this trip to Africa, you could have 1,350 weeks of White House tours, which the White House has canceled indefinitely due to budget constraints, Rep. George Holding, North Carolina Republican, said on the House floor Friday.
Mr. Holding said with the country more than $16 trillion in debt, the administration should not be spending so much money on an eight-day visit to Africa.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Again, on their own plane.
He’s tired from all that fundraising.
Does Bo, the dog, get his own plane or does he get a vacation also and is left home alone at the white crib?
I am betting he's negotiating a ‘position’ somewhere in one of the BS countries he's visiting.
Of course he will be buying his spot with OUR money! God know what else they demand and GET, in order to hold a place for him!
I think Baraq will become prez of the UN, or be on MSNBC, or both.
I see him living the good life in NYC just like ole BJ Clinton.
That IS a funny picture!
Of course he won’t “retire” but I agree he will look for some cushy landing spot.
I wonder how long it will take him to build up a $100million personal fortune. 10 years? 5 years?
Another exemption from Obama’s idea called “sekester”?
No Balls Boner, this is what you get.
These people don’t want open hostilities even though the democrats are openly hostile and doing things that beg a real, strong response. To the point of open ideological warfare and zero compromise.
But none of our guys believe in what they believe enough, and too many of them are gushy RINOs and GOP-elites who aren’t that all unhappy in how things are going.
That picture was when Michelle and friends and family went to Africa..I think it was in 2011 when they went..ever time I see this picture it reminds me of the Hillbillies.. The Clampets had nothing until they struck oil..
These Obamas had nothing until they robbed the American people to get their riches..That I call them freeloaders..
‘Maybe hes shopping around for a retirement home.’
We should not begrudge Obam-o his desire to visit his fatherland.
The problem isn’t that it’s expensive for the President to travel - It is, and I don’t have a problem with that.
My question is the timing of the trip. Why now? While we’re seeing more examples of government excesses on “trips,” and remember the sequestor? What about that?
Mark
“Maybe hes shopping around for a retirement home.”
Don’t think so. He already has a $30 million estate waiting for him in Hawaii, after he leaves office.
Does Barack Obama’s mother-in-law stay in the White House by her lonesome when Barry goes globetrotting or does she get to tag along?
Always good to have some non-US options for when the SHTF in America. I guess being in Hawaii leaves him with a “protective moat” from the problems of the mainland.
O.M.G......I’m saving that one!
Clarification: I heard that the second plane was to fly to Belfast today. Not sure about the Africa trip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.