Posted on 06/06/2013 5:26:18 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, June 6th, the Defense and Prosecution will be back in court to discuss the various motions filed by both the Defense and the Prosecution.
It will be interesting to see Judge Nelsons tone toward the defense.
This is their first encounter since the District Court of Appeals overruled Judge Nelsons decision on the Benjamin Crump deposition.
Arguments today include: finalizing whether or not the States audio expert will be allowed to testify expert testimony motions;
The states motion to compel discovery;
The defense motion to eliminate certain phrases and words;
An odd defense motion for anonymity to protect a specific mystery witness ...
Then we get to the juicy stuff Sanctions against the state for discovery violations and the whistleblower testimony that might put BDLR on the hot seat.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Angela Corey just returned to the courtroom, now that call for possible contempt of her top prosecutor is put off until post-trial.
I caught it and now my son has the proof, he was looking for, that I’m “Anal Retentive”!
it is now all about jury selection.
Pick the jury, win the case.
Dr Nakasone from the FBI on the stand and they are now going to play The Scream live in the courtroom —
Dr says that they need atleast 16 seconds of speech to identify. The Scream only had 3 seconds.
Identification match is not possible.
Now prosecution is up to try to get him to say the opposite.
can someone post live stream again I couldn’t get in earlier
West to Nakasone: Are you aware of any methodology that can identify that 3 second sample that you heard???
Nakasone: NO
Any such claim is “disturbing”.
Recessed until tomorrow — Bernie headed to Burger King for strategic planning session.
Today’s update from KSFO
http://www.ksfo560.com/common/more.php?m=58&ts=1370530202&article=B412CC88CED511E286DEFEFDADE6840A&mode=2
I tried to watch it on CNN HLN, they lied yesterday, told me to tune in at 9 AM for full coverage...what a joke
Rene Stutzman @renestutzman
Judge concludes public part of the hearing til tomorrow but takes attys and court reporter to chambers. Not clear what they’re discussing.
2:49 PM - 6 Jun 2013
Before you get to the length issue, the sample has to be normal speech. It failed on that account. The Dr. mentioned that, but the defense got sidetracked by the time issue, and the Pros. gleefully joined in.
I couldn’t help snickering at the pros making the argument that different scientists could have differing opinions, since their task is to prove that the method they’re seeking to introduce the results of is commonly accepted in the scientific community.
If Ms. “Your Honor” rules this is evidence is admissible, there’s really no hope of getting anything reasonable out of her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.