Dr says that they need atleast 16 seconds of speech to identify. The Scream only had 3 seconds.
Identification match is not possible.
Now prosecution is up to try to get him to say the opposite.
can someone post live stream again I couldn’t get in earlier
West to Nakasone: Are you aware of any methodology that can identify that 3 second sample that you heard???
Nakasone: NO
Any such claim is “disturbing”.
Before you get to the length issue, the sample has to be normal speech. It failed on that account. The Dr. mentioned that, but the defense got sidetracked by the time issue, and the Pros. gleefully joined in.
I couldn’t help snickering at the pros making the argument that different scientists could have differing opinions, since their task is to prove that the method they’re seeking to introduce the results of is commonly accepted in the scientific community.
If Ms. “Your Honor” rules this is evidence is admissible, there’s really no hope of getting anything reasonable out of her.