I would say so.
No, he just admitting to giving comfort and support to the enemy during a time of war. i.e Treason.
Whoa.
Doubtless this will come as a huge surprise to the geniuses in government who claimed "work place violence".
Could you imagine this scenario in 1943...Fritz Strinkel shoots up an American military base and says he was just helping the Nazis.
Holder and Obama called this a WORKPLACE ACCIDENT.
THEY HAVE NOW BEEN CAUGHT IN ANOTHER COUNT OF TREASON.
OK, I’ll go with protecting the Taliban...which makes him a traitor, and therefore subject to the death penalty.
Murder or treason, I’ll take either as long as the result is the same: this Koranimal gets to meet 72 Virginians.
He is raising a "defense of others" defense. Basically, it's the same as self-defense, but the accused says he had to kill to save the life of another person, in this case Mullet Omar.
So, he has to admit to all the elements of intentional murder and then prove his use of force was necessary to save Omar's life AND that Omar was not the aggressor. Since none of his victims were anywhere near Omar, that's gonna be pretty tough to prove.
Guy's a legal genius, I tell ya.
not workplace violence = admitted to terrorist attack - every survivor is entitled to military benefits, purple heart and the 13 victims that perished their families should get everything owed. but why does the moron still get his military pay.
Admitting to Treason.
Convoluted and contorted logic.
You’re fighting for the wrong side.
Buh Bye....
Why not just turn him over to the Klan?