[BenLurkin]

Not sure why Washington Post puts the emphasis on skin color...when the problem is Islam.

[ClearCase_guy]

Oh, we know why.

[ClearCase_guy]

“I can do whatever I want.”

She might beat Hillary in 2016. Tremendous story of triumphing over adversity. Very hard to top that.

[cradle of freedom]

I wonder if they still castrate the male slaves as they did for centuries?

[attiladhun2]

Since the elite media sees everything in terms of race, class, gender, or sexual orientation, they were confused about how to run a story dealing with a favored ideology like Islam. Not wanting to show a favored ideology in a negative light, they turned the story into one about race.

[Zhang Fei]

Interesting classification:

“Under the Islamists, blacks were exploited even more by the pink-skinned people,” said Roukiatou Cisse, a social worker with Temedt, a human rights group, referring to the Tuaregs and Arab Moors.

“Now, the slaves have profited by the pink-skinned people leaving.”

“The pink-skinned people wanted to bring back the old way of slavery,” said Traore, the former slave.

[colorado tanker]

The people refer to themselves by skin color. After the Islamists, who come from light skinned tribes to the north, came to town light skinned people in town felt entitled to take slaves.

[bigheadfred]

emphasis on skin color...

they are doing it because the arabs do it the lighter your skin tone the higher your status like when my bro brought my nephew over to egypt all those people wanted to touch the nephew cause touching a white blue eyed baby brought you good luck

[Regulator]

Maybe they should ask the liberated slaves how they felt about pink skinned but mostly brown eyed French troops being their liberators.

[workerbee]

The fact is that the vicious activities of the Oxford ring are bound up with religion and race: religion, because all the perpetrators, though they had different nationalities, were Muslim; and race, because they deliberately targeted vulnerable white girls, whom they appeared to regard as ‘easy meat’, to use one of their revealing, racist phrases.

Indeed, one of the victims who bravely gave evidence in court told a newspaper afterwards that ‘the men exclusively wanted white girls to abuse’.

But as so often in fearful, politically correct modern Britain, there is a craven unwillingness to face up to this reality. Commentators and politicians tip-toe around it, hiding behind weasel words...... But all this is deluded nonsense. While it is, of course, true that abuse happens in all communities, no amount of obfuscation can hide the pattern that has been exposed in a series of recent chilling scandals, from Rochdale to Oxford, and Telford to Derby. In all these incidents, the abusers were Muslim men, and their targets were under-age white girls.

UK Muslim Paedophile Rings Are an Epidemic

[Blood of Tyrants]

Now arm them or they will be slaves again the minute the ragheads return.

[man_in_tx]

The race gambit is a tired attempt to deflect the discussion from a religion (Islam) followed by people representing all “colors,” and “race,” which is not an area where Islam has a pristine track record, if the ignorami who write for the MSM would realize, if they did any serious research.

To call someone a “racist” for critiquing Islam is so absurd as to be risible.

[man_in_tx]

Terrific. Another touching tale of the blessings of “The Religion of Peace,” so named by former President Bush, and, thereafter, repeated my many others.