Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not voting present?
1 posted on 06/03/2013 10:28:00 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sub-Driver

“Kerry, however, said the administration still has concerns that the U.N.’s various translations of the pact don’t include the same language.”

Only a government hack would sign an agreement that varies so much between the parties signing.


2 posted on 06/03/2013 10:31:59 AM PDT by edcoil (If you can't change the rules, then ignore them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

He’ll wait until after 2014 mid-terms.

He’s stuck enough sticks into the hornet’s nest (NRA).

He needs to shut up for 1.5 years to keep the NRA from overwhelming the polls and his hopes for Her Lordship Nancy.


3 posted on 06/03/2013 10:32:37 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (MOHAMMED WAS A CHILD RAPIST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
President Obama will not immediately sign a United Nations arms trade treaty opposed by the National Rifle Association (NRA) but is committed to doing so shortly,

He's got to stage another school shooting first...

4 posted on 06/03/2013 10:32:40 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Sadly, one of the smartest comments Hanoi John's ever made. Read it first.

In actuality, I expect Obama to wait until the press is done and then sign it quietly thinking he can avoid riling up gun owners.

5 posted on 06/03/2013 10:34:28 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
I have a question for the UN arms control people. Are they claiming that as things are now, the US is arming "violent extremists and human rights abusers" around the world?

If not, then why all the pressure for the US to sign it? Just to pressure Russia and China to sign it (which they won't)? The devil is in the fine print I'm sure.

6 posted on 06/03/2013 10:35:40 AM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Advocates for the pact had hoped the president would sign the treaty as soon as it became open for signatures on Monday, arguing that such a public display of support would create pressure on major arms dealers, such as Russia and China, to get on board.

Yeah. Because the Chinese and Russian governments are well known for falling in line when the UN snaps its collective fingers. What planet are these people from?

12 posted on 06/03/2013 10:48:40 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"As a humanitarian organization, we’ve seen firsthand the impact of the global arms trade on innocent men, women and children in places like Syria and South Sudan. The time is now for the United States to lead by example and sign this treaty as swiftly as possible to stop dangerous weapons from reaching violent extremists and human rights abusers. There is no time left to wait.”

What dreck!

The violations are being perpetrated upon the unarmed.

Any student of history will recognize the pattern.

ONLY either providing the means for the defenseless to defend themselves or providing others to defend them will work, at least until the oppressors are removed.

There is no guarantee that the oppressed will not become oppressors, and they need not have firearms to do so. (Many slaughtered in Rwanda and Burundi were killed with machetes.)

13 posted on 06/03/2013 11:05:00 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Kerry pushed back against those concerns, saying the treaty would in no way infringe on Second Amendment rights.

Well, there it is. I feel better already.

17 posted on 06/03/2013 11:23:45 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
Well, well, well...

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

19 posted on 06/03/2013 11:49:55 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

He’ll sign it on Friday June 30th.

The 4th of July falls on Tuesday and the news will be replete with celebrations of the anticpated 4 or5 day weekend and we’ll be entertained with the cost of gasoline and AAA guess as to how many people will travel on this holiday.

Heck, I bet they run stories about alternative plans by people who are not celbrating


21 posted on 06/03/2013 11:53:52 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

0bama signing a Treaty that stops him from arming his jihadi buddies in Syria?!

LOL!


23 posted on 06/03/2013 12:30:02 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Advocates for the pact had hoped the president would sign the treaty as soon as it became open for signatures on Monday, arguing that such a public display of support would create pressure on major arms dealers, such as Russia and China, to get on board.

Barack Obama? "Create pressure" on China and Russia?

In what universe would that happen?

24 posted on 06/03/2013 12:52:07 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Advocates for the treaty suggest the delay is, in part, politically motivated, and that the administration may wait until Congress is in recess this August to sign the treaty when few people are paying attention.

No way! Not possible. I simply refuse to believe that the most transparent presidential administration in the history of our nation would behave that way...

/s

25 posted on 06/03/2013 12:54:13 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
1. Kerry is a traitorous scumbag whose shameful naval record was expunged by the vicious anti-Semite Carter.

2. Obama knows he cannot get a 2/3 vote in the Senate, so why why further infuriate Repubs now while his gangster administration is being dismantled by the House?

27 posted on 06/03/2013 1:29:45 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

“Kerry pushed back-—” Kerry doesn’t even push on his own colon——the krap just runs out of him. He thinks everybody will take his word that his fake treaty doesn’t hurt the second amendment? Woops! there goes another load!


28 posted on 06/03/2013 1:36:23 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

He is a bastard. Probably wants to hype it on TV when he does sign.


30 posted on 06/04/2013 4:52:19 PM PDT by ZULU ((See: http://gatesofvienna.net/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson