Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama punts on signing UN arms trade pact opposed by NRA
The Hill ^

Posted on 06/03/2013 10:28:00 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Obama punts on signing UN arms trade pact opposed by NRA

By Julian Pecquet - 06/03/13 12:00 PM ET

President Obama will not immediately sign a United Nations arms trade treaty opposed by the National Rifle Association (NRA) but is committed to doing so shortly, Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday.

Advocates for the pact had hoped the president would sign the treaty as soon as it became open for signatures on Monday, arguing that such a public display of support would create pressure on major arms dealers, such as Russia and China, to get on board.

Kerry, however, said the administration still has concerns that the U.N.'s various translations of the pact don't include the same language.

“The United States welcomes the opening of the Arms Trade Treaty for signature,” Kerry said in a statement. “We look forward to signing it as soon as the process of conforming the official translations is completed satisfactorily.”

The NRA insists the pact is a U.N.-backed gun grab. A majority of senators have already said they oppose the treaty, making ratification impossible in the short-term.

Kerry pushed back against those concerns, saying the treaty would in no way infringe on Second Amendment rights.

Advocates for the treaty suggest the delay is, in part, politically motivated, and that the administration may wait until Congress is in recess this August to sign the treaty when few people are paying attention.

They say the treaty, which the U.S. mission to the U.N. joined 155 other countries in approving in April, was originally in English and that the administration could make clear in its signing statement what its requirements are before the translations are revised.

Raymond Offenheiser, president of Oxfam America, said he was "disappointed" by the delay but "confident the US will sign the treaty as expeditiously as possible."

"As a humanitarian organization, we’ve seen firsthand the impact of the global arms trade on innocent men, women and children in places like Syria and South Sudan. The time is now for the United States to lead by example and sign this treaty as swiftly as possible to stop dangerous weapons from reaching violent extremists and human rights abusers. There is no time left to wait.”

Here's Kerry's full statement:

United States Welcomes Opening of Arms Trade Treaty for Signature

The United States welcomes the opening of the Arms Trade Treaty for signature, and we look forward to signing it as soon as the process of conforming the official translations is completed satisfactorily.

The Treaty is an important contribution to efforts to stem the illicit trade in conventional weapons, which fuels conflict, empowers violent extremists, and contributes to violations of human rights. The Treaty will require the parties to implement strict controls, of the kind the United States already has in place, on the international transfer of conventional arms to prevent their diversion and misuse and create greater international cooperation against black market arms merchants. The ATT will not undermine the legitimate international trade in conventional weapons, interfere with national sovereignty, or infringe on the rights of American citizens, including our Second Amendment rights.

We commend the Presidents of the two UN negotiating conferences – Roberto Garcia Moritan of Argentina and Peter Woolcott of Australia – for their leadership in bringing this agreement to fruition. We also congratulate all the states that helped achieve an effective, implementable Treaty that will reduce the risk that international transfers of conventional arms will be used to carry out the world’s worst crimes.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: att; banglist; bhofascism; corruption; democrats; donttreadonme; govtabuse; guncontrol; gunregistry; nocompromise; obama; secondamendment; unarmstreaty; unguncontrol; waronliberty; wewillnotcomply; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Not voting present?
1 posted on 06/03/2013 10:28:00 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Kerry, however, said the administration still has concerns that the U.N.’s various translations of the pact don’t include the same language.”

Only a government hack would sign an agreement that varies so much between the parties signing.


2 posted on 06/03/2013 10:31:59 AM PDT by edcoil (If you can't change the rules, then ignore them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He’ll wait until after 2014 mid-terms.

He’s stuck enough sticks into the hornet’s nest (NRA).

He needs to shut up for 1.5 years to keep the NRA from overwhelming the polls and his hopes for Her Lordship Nancy.


3 posted on 06/03/2013 10:32:37 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (MOHAMMED WAS A CHILD RAPIST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
President Obama will not immediately sign a United Nations arms trade treaty opposed by the National Rifle Association (NRA) but is committed to doing so shortly,

He's got to stage another school shooting first...

4 posted on 06/03/2013 10:32:40 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Sadly, one of the smartest comments Hanoi John's ever made. Read it first.

In actuality, I expect Obama to wait until the press is done and then sign it quietly thinking he can avoid riling up gun owners.

5 posted on 06/03/2013 10:34:28 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I have a question for the UN arms control people. Are they claiming that as things are now, the US is arming "violent extremists and human rights abusers" around the world?

If not, then why all the pressure for the US to sign it? Just to pressure Russia and China to sign it (which they won't)? The devil is in the fine print I'm sure.

6 posted on 06/03/2013 10:35:40 AM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

“Such a display of support (weakness) will put pressure on Russia and China to get on board (laugh).


7 posted on 06/03/2013 10:38:40 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sender

Fast and Furious and arming of the Mexican cartels, the current smuggling to the Syrian rebels via Benghazi, the Moslem brotherhood in Egypt getting everything from rifles to F-16s, the Libyan al qeida rebels, the Afghan military, the Palestinian authority with tens of thousands of M-16s.

Who could -ever- accuse US of arming terrorists?


8 posted on 06/03/2013 10:42:11 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: apillar

exactly,,, he’s got it ready, now he’s just waiting for another mass shooting. Obama is evil.


9 posted on 06/03/2013 10:43:35 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
’ Obama punts on signing UN arms trade pact ..’
Mr. Obama has been, is, and will continue to be a punt on gun control.
TWB
10 posted on 06/03/2013 10:46:05 AM PDT by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sender

Although, i will admit. The UN is an organization is almost entirely made up of human rights abusers, terrorists, and despots. So there is no way their goal is to stop the flow of arms to such types.

Their goal is to protect state sanctioned weapons trade businesses, and to find ways to declaw American gun owners.


11 posted on 06/03/2013 10:46:54 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Advocates for the pact had hoped the president would sign the treaty as soon as it became open for signatures on Monday, arguing that such a public display of support would create pressure on major arms dealers, such as Russia and China, to get on board.

Yeah. Because the Chinese and Russian governments are well known for falling in line when the UN snaps its collective fingers. What planet are these people from?

12 posted on 06/03/2013 10:48:40 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"As a humanitarian organization, we’ve seen firsthand the impact of the global arms trade on innocent men, women and children in places like Syria and South Sudan. The time is now for the United States to lead by example and sign this treaty as swiftly as possible to stop dangerous weapons from reaching violent extremists and human rights abusers. There is no time left to wait.”

What dreck!

The violations are being perpetrated upon the unarmed.

Any student of history will recognize the pattern.

ONLY either providing the means for the defenseless to defend themselves or providing others to defend them will work, at least until the oppressors are removed.

There is no guarantee that the oppressed will not become oppressors, and they need not have firearms to do so. (Many slaughtered in Rwanda and Burundi were killed with machetes.)

13 posted on 06/03/2013 11:05:00 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender
I have a question for the UN arms control people. Are they claiming that as things are now, the US is arming "violent extremists and human rights abusers" around the world?

. Does the ban include F-5s, F-15s and F-16s sold to peaceful governments like Egypt?

14 posted on 06/03/2013 11:12:31 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Fast and Furious and arming of the Mexican cartels, the current smuggling to the Syrian rebels via Benghazi, the Moslem brotherhood in Egypt getting everything from rifles to F-16s, the Libyan al qeida rebels, the Afghan military, the Palestinian authority with tens of thousands of M-16s.

Ahh, my FR Brother, These which you mention are not "illicit". They are sponsored by a sovereign government engaged in diplomacy, as will any and all trade deals between Iran, North Korea, China, Russia, Syria, etc. An illicit arms trade would be without the authorization of a government. It is my understanding this is to restrict "black market" and "smuggling" of weapons. It's the UN. The devil is in the details. Question we should ask is, why would we need a treaty to get nations to agree that something that is illegal is also illegal by a consistent standard (as written)?

The laws that are to be broken per this treaty have yet to be written.

15 posted on 06/03/2013 11:17:09 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 ("The British are Coming (to confiscate weapons)" - Paul Revere (We know how that ended))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; immadashell

True, the US has armed some despicable people under the pretense of arming “the opposition” or “rebels”, and no way should we be sending planes to Egypt. As you say, the UN is largely composed of these same despicable people. I’m sure that part of this treaty involves a mandatory registry of guns, because how else can they keep us citizens from arming Sudan or Somalia?


16 posted on 06/03/2013 11:19:52 AM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Kerry pushed back against those concerns, saying the treaty would in no way infringe on Second Amendment rights.

Well, there it is. I feel better already.

17 posted on 06/03/2013 11:23:45 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

What you say makes sense, but I don’t think he will wait.


18 posted on 06/03/2013 11:48:03 AM PDT by Gator113 ( ~just keep livin~ I drink good wine, listen to good music and dream good dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
Well, well, well...

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

19 posted on 06/03/2013 11:49:55 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

He’ll probably sign it late some Friday afternoon.


20 posted on 06/03/2013 11:51:23 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson