Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Economy Drowning In A Liquidity Trap?
The Market Oracle ^ | 5-26-2013 | Frank Shostak

Posted on 05/26/2013 1:09:04 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 05/26/2013 1:09:04 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Of course, the “liquidity trap” is fixed with higher taxes.. keeps the velocity of money going. /s


2 posted on 05/26/2013 1:15:14 PM PDT by Track9 (hey Kalid.. kalid.. bang you're dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

More government spending? Idiots!! ObamaCare alone is going to tank us.


3 posted on 05/26/2013 1:16:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Jeez. How often do we have to explain it to the Keynesians?

"Fear the Boom and Bust" a Hayek vs. Keynes Rap Anthem

In the 1930,s Keynes could say "in the long run we're all dead." Well guess what? The long run is here now.

4 posted on 05/26/2013 1:16:53 PM PDT by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

We have experienced 6% inflation for the last 5 years running, these moneychanger fraudsters are the problem, and they have been since the beginning of Recorded History. Our entire monetary system is based on fraud and deceit. The biggest problem we have is the FED itself. But with scumbag fraudsters like this pumping their “Print more money” schemes, along with their accomplices in the media and the Government, we are SCREWED. Maybe one of these moneychanger assholes would like to explain what the inflation rate would be if we calculated the same way we did in the 70’s. Can you say 8%?? The price of ENERGY has more than doubled, the price of food also. The food that hasn’t doubled has decreased portions, a half gallon of Ice Cream is now 48 ounces.


5 posted on 05/26/2013 1:43:45 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

We don’t need more government spending. At least not with this President.

What we need is to reindustrialize and provide jobs for the 23% unemployed (Shadowstats.com). To do that, we need to restore the import tariffs back to where they were 40 years ago. And maybe even go higher until industry has a chance to recover.

We could lower the income taxes by the same amount as the tariffs so that it’s revenue neutral. The income tax decrease would further boost the economy and offset any higher product prices on foreign imports.

Government revenues would increase and gov’t outlays would decrease as people went back to work, which would fix our budget deficits.


6 posted on 05/26/2013 1:49:41 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

7 posted on 05/26/2013 1:53:49 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I think it’s called”Too Many Dollars Chasing Too Few Goods”?This leads to”De-Flation”which,(in turn),leads to”INFLATION”!!As far as economics goes,did ANYBODY in The White House study ANYTHING except for the old Soviet Union’s”Five_Year Plan”?????????????????????????


8 posted on 05/26/2013 1:57:19 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
" in the money supply has no boosting effect because it does not lead to additional spending by consumers or businesses "

And why would that be Bruce Bartlett ?

Perhaps it's because the FED is printing to much money therefore decreases the value of the dollar therefore no matter how much people and businesses spend the value of their dollar is less and therefore they get less for their money ?
9 posted on 05/26/2013 2:02:49 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
The dollar menu at any fast food restaurant like Burger King. Wendys will get you a burger the size of the old WhiteCastle burger you would get 50 years ago.
Might as well call them $ 1 sliders.
10 posted on 05/26/2013 2:06:36 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Actually ? yes lower imcome taxes but let the free markets do what they do best and government stay out of it with all the regulations, fines, E.P.A. BS.
One bright spot is the recent energy boom that helps is lowering fuel costs to run a busniess in areas like Texas, N.D.

11 posted on 05/26/2013 2:09:03 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

The only way to get money in the hands of the people is to lower taxes. The leftist Keynesians will never do that.


12 posted on 05/26/2013 2:11:53 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
we need to restore the import tariffs back to where they were 40 years ago. And maybe even go higher until industry has a chance to recover. We could lower the income taxes by the same amount as the tariffs so that it’s revenue neutral. The income tax decrease would further boost the economy and offset any higher product prices on foreign imports.

You are such a quaint 18th century person. /sarc

13 posted on 05/26/2013 2:13:47 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

“To do that, we need to restore the import tariffs back to where they were 40 years ago. And maybe even go higher until industry has a chance to recover.”

We need to put them back at the levels of the late 1800s, which is to say, enough to run the government off of. Then abolish the income tax altogether.


14 posted on 05/26/2013 2:32:08 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
The whole idea of a "liquidity trap" is Keynesian nonsense, to be "fixed" with more Keynesian spending.
15 posted on 05/26/2013 2:36:14 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney ( New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The “liquidity trap” is all the American dollars going to China.

We are buying imports.

This helps nobody. Except for Chinese.


16 posted on 05/26/2013 2:39:58 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
"but let the free markets do what they do best and government stay out of it with all the regulations, fines, E.P.A. BS."

If we want a free market, we better protect it from the likes of China. We are trading with markets that are not free. That do not purchase U.S. goods in return, but instead use the dollars they raise to purchase our manufacturing know how.

And while I want the EPA brought under control and due process before they can levy fines, I don't want pollution deregulated. I want rivers and lakes we can swim in and air that's fit to breath.

And I'd love to see some deregulation, but I'm not hearing anybody say specifically what they would deregulate except to mention whole agencies that wouldn't fly with me and wouldn't fly with most Americans. I don't think anybody really has a plan to deregulate.

17 posted on 05/26/2013 2:43:26 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
"but let the free markets do what they do best and government stay out of it with all the regulations, fines, E.P.A. BS."

If we want a free market, we better protect it from the likes of China. We are trading with markets that are not free. That do not purchase U.S. goods in return, but instead use the dollars they raise to purchase our manufacturing know how.

And while I want the EPA brought under control and due process before they can levy fines, I don't want pollution deregulated. I want rivers and lakes we can swim in and air that's fit to breath.

And I'd love to see some deregulation, but I'm not hearing anybody say specifically what they would deregulate except to mention whole agencies that wouldn't fly with me and wouldn't fly with most Americans. I don't think anybody really has a plan to deregulate.

18 posted on 05/26/2013 2:43:27 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

W O O ! H O O !
Please Contribute Today!
Barely $400 to the yellow!! We can do this!!

19 posted on 05/26/2013 2:49:53 PM PDT by RedMDer (You are Free Republic. There are no outside influences. Just us, all of us. Please donate today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bandleader

”Too Many Dollars Chasing Too Few Goods”?This leads to”De-Flation”

No, too many dollars chasing too few goods never leads to deflation. It would lead directly to inflation, like we experienced in the ‘70s.

What lead to deflation in the ‘30s was the collapse of the money supply, specifically the credit component of the money supply as banks failed. If we are experiencing deflation now it will be due to a vast amount of mortgage loans going bad inside the banking system.


20 posted on 05/26/2013 2:53:14 PM PDT by Pelham (Deport illegal aliens? Hell yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson