Posted on 05/23/2013 3:49:51 PM PDT by lowbridge
In stark contrast, the Obama Administrations response has been to avoid calling the attack terrorism, let alone terrorism motivated by a radical Islamic ideology. Instead the Administration, via the State Department, said it stood with the U.K. in the face of such senseless violence.
Senseless violence? One can hardly term a targeted attack on a U.K. soldier in broad daylight where the assailants gleefully admit the radical motivation behind their attack senseless violence.
Yet, use of this terminology is nothing new for the Obama Administration. Senseless violence is the Administrations catch-all phrase loyally called upon whenever motivations for a despicable act should not be ascribed, lest someone take offense.
Particularly troubling is that senseless violence is the same terminology the Administration used when describing the terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed the American Ambassador and three other U.S. citizens.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.heritage.org ...
perhaps it was a little example of “welfare-place violence”
(you know, like Obama’s “work-place violence?”
geeeeee, maybe a reporter can find the cajones to ask O just what kind of act WOULD IT TAKE for him to call ANY Islamic’s murderous violent attacks “terrorism?”
just wondering is all....
just wondering...
I’m trying to find the video on YouTube that caused this. /s
It’s more of a “kitchen utensil accident.” Could have happened to anybody. /s
They have to call terrorism “senseless” lest their mask slip and they show that they agree with the purpose: the destruction of western civilization.
“Im surprised the Bamster didnt warn the British not to discriminate against the Muslim.” (CO Tanker)
Actually, they just did that on Monday this week. See link.
It matters what Obama thinks and says. Because it is an indication of his love of Islam. Same for DCI Brennan (also a muslim).
Another “lone wolf”?
I’m sure Europe enjoyed being lectured to by Kerry and Obama. Just when I think this bunch can’t get any worse . . .
To Baraq Hussein mohammed 0bama muzzie atrocities are not terrorism, because HE TOO is a muzzie.
I WILL BELIEVE OBAMA IS NOT A MUSLIM WHEN I SEE HIM EAT A PULLED PORK SANDWICH ON TV DO YOU THINK THEY EVER SERVE PORK AT THE WHITE HOUSE DINNERS?
Through the Looking Glass
obama is a putrid human being. denies reality on purpose. loves his fellow muzzies doing jihad. while he practices al-taqiyaa.
“If Obama had a son ....”
Right you are. It’s not just Obama and his love for his fathers religion. It’s the progressive war on Christianity and Judaism. They long to use the tactics of the Muslims against their enemies and long for the slaughter of Israel.
He had to, he had his speech talking about the end of widespread terror dontchaknow.
I don’t think it will be long before Barry the Apologizer orders Eric the Holder to ban “the “T” word in America.
It was the terrorism of Jihad.
It was an act of war.
The administration’s reaction is outrageous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.