1 posted on
05/21/2013 7:18:35 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
To: jiggyboy
Max Bacchus (sp?) has given his remarks. Orren Hatch is just finishing his now. All the usual phrases are being used, “make sure this never happens again”, etc.
2 posted on
05/21/2013 7:20:24 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: jiggyboy
Bachus says this has caused the people to lose trust in the IRS. LOL
I lost my trust in the IRS about the first time I got a paycheck.
5 posted on
05/21/2013 7:22:29 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: jiggyboy
The IRS harassment EXTENDED over TWO election cycles.
Where is the accountability?
7 posted on
05/21/2013 7:25:52 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
To: jiggyboy
Miller has GOT to be kidding! He’s pulling out the old “haven’t had time to prepare” line again! Is he just going to repeat word for word his evasions from LAST WEEK?
9 posted on
05/21/2013 7:27:40 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: jiggyboy
Miller regards this as “poor service”.
10 posted on
05/21/2013 7:27:50 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
To: jiggyboy
Since when does the witness set the agenda?
Miller says that due time considerations a statement is in writing. Did I hear that right?
11 posted on
05/21/2013 7:29:18 AM PDT by
RedMDer
(May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
To: jiggyboy
What a joke. Baccus stumbling around and affecting mock outrage, yet he was one of the signers of a letter to IRS to look into the Tea Party groups’ tax status. The fact that he is the person running the hearings should be the real outrage.
17 posted on
05/21/2013 7:35:40 AM PDT by
kabar
To: jiggyboy
Were they sworn in?
Can this thread be posted under Breaking News so others will know about this hearing.
Thanks
22 posted on
05/21/2013 7:42:02 AM PDT by
billys kid
("Bury me on my head for one day this world will be upside down." (Diogenes))
To: jiggyboy
Amendment XIV.4: The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
If a current government is indebting Americans in rebellion against our constitution form of government, I read to above the Constitutional clause to say the people are NOT in anyway obligated to make good those debts.
Federal Reserve take note!
25 posted on
05/21/2013 7:43:49 AM PDT by
Errant
To: jiggyboy
The US income tax is voluntary.
Really.
I’m super serial!
I was on vacation, that’s all.
Voluntary. I’m not kidding. They even said so last week in a hearing.
Voluntary!
Signed,
Wesley Snipes
To: jiggyboy
Curious to see how one of these hearings goes when run by lefties.
28 posted on
05/21/2013 7:46:12 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
(Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
To: jiggyboy
NO ONE is talking about criminal charges. The republicans are not trying to get to the truth. I know they will not get the truth, but they could let them know that people WILL go to jail. My opinion why nothing will happen to anyone; the rinos also sent the IRS after teaparty and religious groups to help romney. This hearing is a joke. Elitists win again. We are held by a higher standard than those who govern us. If nothing comes of this and other CRIMES by this administration a third party will grow. I'm not voting republican if they can't do their job and bring people to justice.
65 posted on
05/21/2013 8:29:01 AM PDT by
Linda Frances
(Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
To: jiggyboy
I was hoping either the House or Senate would mention and/or question the criteria established by Homeland Security the disposition of TEA partiers fitting the example of domestic terrorists. Given that thought, it would behoove the Exempt office to closely discern these applications to make sure they were not domestic terrorists, thus entitling them to ask extensively about donors, etc. It is not so much just a bunch of losers in the IRS intimidating citizens, but more the systemic establishment of conservatives are dangerous for America.
To: jiggyboy
84 posted on
05/21/2013 9:10:44 AM PDT by
txmissy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson