Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeff Flake hints: I’ll support expanded background checks in return for changes on Internet sales
Hot Air ^ | May 7, 2013 | Allahpundit

Posted on 05/07/2013 11:05:35 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A week ago, he noted on his Facebook page that his poll numbers after voting no on Toomey/Manchin put him somewhere south of “pond scum.” Today, this.

He won’t face the voters again for five and a half years, but he shares a home state with Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly. They can hurt him by campaigning against him in 2018 more than they can anyone else in the Senate. No wonder he’s looking for ways to flip:

Republican Sen. Jeff Flake told CNN he is willing to reverse his opposition to expanding background checks for guns if the Senate sponsors change on the bill’s provision dealing with internet sales…

He said under the measure as written, if a gun owner sends a few friends a text or email asking if they want to buy their gun, or posts it on their Facebook page, “that is considered a commercial sale.”

For people in rural areas in his state and others, he said that becomes inconvenient and costly…

Some Republicans opposed the measure out of fear that expanding background checks would put the country on a path to a national gun registry, but Flake said that is not his concern.

If Flake flips, that’s 55 votes for Toomey/Manchin. Johnny Isakson also allegedly told a gun-control activist yesterday that he’s “having conversations” with T&M to improve their bill.....

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 113th; arizona; banglist; flake; gopestablishment; guncontrol; idiocy; internetsalestax; internettax; jeffflake; rino; secondamendment; squish; stupidparty; trading; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Those issues are not even related. WTH


21 posted on 05/07/2013 11:22:36 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Whore


22 posted on 05/07/2013 11:23:12 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“...but Flake said that is not his concern.”

Of course it isn’t. Just like all the rest, D’s and R’s, his concern is getting reelected.


23 posted on 05/07/2013 11:23:31 AM PDT by beelzepug (Telling other people they need to die is a good way to get your own lamp blown out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
Please don't mention Jeff 'Flake' and Ted Cruz in the same sentence. "So, @beyonce and Jay-Z are in Cuba? Fine by me. Every American should have the right to travel there."
- Jeff Flake Tweet

Would Jeff Flake also same the same thing about these others??...

- IRAN*
- SUDAN*
- SYRIA*

* State sponsors of terrorism

24 posted on 05/07/2013 11:23:52 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well the thing that’s consistent with this guy is he has the right name:FLAKE!
Freegards
LEX


25 posted on 05/07/2013 11:23:53 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Photo & Video Sharing by SmugMug
26 posted on 05/07/2013 11:25:34 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“...he noted on his Facebook page that his poll numbers after voting no on Toomey/Manchin put him somewhere south of “pond scum.”

Does anyone actually believe that poll numbers that bad because of his Manchin-Toomey vite are accurate? Did they poll democrats exclusively? I’m amazed that Flake would believe them.


27 posted on 05/07/2013 11:26:42 AM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
He’s no Ted Cruz, that’s for sure. What is wrong with AZ senators....lack of spine and/or character?

Must be the heat, I dunno.
28 posted on 05/07/2013 11:27:31 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

“Those issues are not even related.”


I thought the same thing (I thought he meant that terrible bill that passed the House mandating that businesses collect sales taxes for states in which they do not do business), but read the article, and he meant a provision in Manchin-Toomey regarding application of the law to private transactions that were advertised on the Internet (whether on social media or via e-mail).

He’s still a sell-out, though.


29 posted on 05/07/2013 11:27:54 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You can stand for the constitution, Flake, or you can stand as a traitor. Which will it be?


30 posted on 05/07/2013 11:27:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Flake is a political prostitute. He has already advertised his rates. He has no principles. Just a stated price for his vote. Too bad the people he misrepresents can't get this flake out of office.
31 posted on 05/07/2013 11:30:17 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It definitely says “ My vote is for sale”.


32 posted on 05/07/2013 11:31:00 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“What part of the word “no” is so difficult to understand?”

Exactly. And again, these clowns do not get “shall not be infringed” either. You can probably count on one hand the number that actually take the oath they took to heart.


33 posted on 05/07/2013 11:42:17 AM PDT by cld51860 (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
He said under the measure as written, if a gun owner sends a few friends a text or email asking if they want to buy their gun, or posts it on their Facebook page, “that is considered a commercial sale.”

So you take out a couple of the really nasty bits of this law and you can swallow the rest of the unconstitutional parts of it? There is no clean end of this turd to pick up.

34 posted on 05/07/2013 11:42:57 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is the Amnesty Liberal Sarah Palin supported over a more consevative candidate in the primary.

Make note


35 posted on 05/07/2013 11:43:55 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Both.


36 posted on 05/07/2013 11:52:15 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Senator Flake didn’t take long to live up to his name (definition - small flat piece: a small flat piece or small part of a layer broken or detached from a larger object). He flaked away from the conservative base and from his integrity faster that Lindsey Graham says “yes” when invited to a turkish bath. He joined the Gang of Eight within days of being sworn into his office (if not before he was sworn in—he may have sold his soul at “freshmen orientation”).

And I contributed to his campaign—NEVER again.

Someone up thread said that his name should not be spoken in the same breath as that of Ted Cruz. I agree—they are in totally different leagues. Flake is a midget. Ted Cruz is quickly proving himself to be a giant.


37 posted on 05/07/2013 11:53:34 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Basically he is saying “I will Bury You” One way or another.

TT


38 posted on 05/07/2013 11:53:41 AM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The bribes and arm twisting has begun.


39 posted on 05/07/2013 11:53:59 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Constitution’s Article V details the way amendments are added or changed. This isn’t one of them.


40 posted on 05/07/2013 11:59:21 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson