Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Barone: The Meaning Inside the Political Numbers
Wall Street Journal ^ | May 6, 2013 | Michael Barone

Posted on 05/06/2013 10:29:35 PM PDT by neverdem

With black and Hispanic support clustered by district, Democrats in 2014 will have a hard time retaking the House.

Psephologists—the fancy word for election analysts—like to talk about change and transformation. One party or the other, they say, is on the verge of forging an enduring national majority. One party or the other is doomed.

What I have come to see in my number crunching is not change and transformation, but continuity. Three presidents in a row have been re-elected with 49%, 51% and 51% of the vote. Over the past two decades, Democrats won four of six presidential elections and won a popular-vote plurality in a fifth. But starting in 1994, Republicans won a majority in the House of Representatives in eight of the 10 congressional elections.

That is not the result of massive ticket-splitting, as in the years from 1968 to 1988, when many Southern whites and others voted Republican for president and for Democrats in the House. On the contrary, the number of congressional districts electing a House member for one...

--snip--

These developments, plus the shrewd sponsorship by then-Rep. Rahm Emanuel—as Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman—of moderate candidates in conservative-leaning districts, enabled Democrats to win 53% of the House popular vote in 2006 and 54% in 2008.

--snip--

My conclusion: Republicans were hurt when voters doubted their competence, Democrats when voters opposed their ideology...

--snip--

Democrats have a clear problem with clustering. They cannot expect to improve on their performance with black voters in the two Obama elections, and they need to expand their appeal beyond their clusters of support to win congressional majorities. That may be difficult since their party tends to be defined, as it was not in the breakout years of 2006 and 2008, by a liberal incumbent president...

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014house; house2014
Michael Barone: The Gang of Ocho - E-Verify and high-skill immigration are what we should be looking at now.
1 posted on 05/06/2013 10:29:36 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
One party or the other, they say, is on the verge of forging an enduring national majority. One party or the other is doomed.

This time it might be true. By economy etc., 2012 was a wave year for Republicans, and they still lost handily. If they couldn't win in 2012, it may not be possible for them to win. They had the complete wind at their back.

2 posted on 05/06/2013 10:47:51 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>> The Gang of Ocho

I’m partial to: The Gang of 8holes.


3 posted on 05/06/2013 11:17:15 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Barone said Romney would win.


4 posted on 05/06/2013 11:29:47 PM PDT by albie (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If Bernanke continues QE through next year, we are more likely to see a stalemate in the mid-terms. Hate to see it, but it will take more financial distress for the Republicans to take back that. That, or start letting Cruz and Paul be the face of the Republican senate. Otherwise, we are stuck with the same House, same Senate to the end of Obama.


5 posted on 05/06/2013 11:33:39 PM PDT by untwist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

Barone forgot to account for fraud...


6 posted on 05/06/2013 11:38:37 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: albie

Barone cites some interesting stats, such as Romney carrying 226 congressional districts to Obama’s 209.

Given that the ‘Rats won’t turn out as many voters in 2014 as they did in 2012, it does not appear likely that the ‘Rats can flip control of the House.


7 posted on 05/06/2013 11:45:16 PM PDT by nd76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They had the complete wind at their back.

...and Capt.Wrongway Peachfuzz at the helm

8 posted on 05/07/2013 1:03:48 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: albie

And he was wrong.


9 posted on 05/07/2013 1:08:26 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

It shouldn’t have mattered if Boris Badenov was the candidate. The numbers aren’t there.


10 posted on 05/07/2013 1:09:30 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: albie

“Barone said Romney would win.”

What you said.


11 posted on 05/07/2013 1:25:57 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’d have liked to see him address the fact that at the Presidential level, 2012 was a low turnout election, despite the Democrats’ vaunted round ‘em up and turn’em out high tech get out the vote operation(even if it is conceded , which I don’t, that voter fraud played little role). Did that low turn-out at the Presidential level play a large role at the Congressional level? How could it not have? The extent to which the media have been willing to avert their eyes from examining that is not surprising given their subservience to Obama, but is astonishing in their dereliction of duty. The Wikipedia article on voter turnout is laughably deceitful (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections), claiming that the US population of eligible voters declined by 18 m between 2008-2012, in a country that is apparently gaining population at a rate of several million each year. Dave Leip (remember he stuck with the old color scheme of Democrat red when the networks decided to change it to avoid the connotation that Dems were commies http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ )hasn’t completed his bar graph showing voter turn out. I suspect that the reason is that the percentage of voting age population that turned out was down near 50%, which hardly goes along with the media theme that the Democrats have created a voting juggernaut and Republicans need to cut deals with that in mind.


12 posted on 05/07/2013 2:45:53 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
Dr. Ray Fair (who authored "Predicting presidential elections and other things") wrote, "The presidential election is thus predicted to be very close regarding vote share, as it has been since October of last year" on October 26, 2012.

Predicting presidential elections and other things

It was "The economy stupid", but that the US economy was recovering too well for voters to fire Obama, and not to fire him because of the dismal recovery. (Roosevelt managed reelection with a similarly dismal economic performance.)

IMO (not Dr. Fair's) if the presidential election had been held in 2010 or was to be held in 2014, the outcome would be completely different. The economy has been in a historically muted recovery, but still doing well enough that a few % of voters didn't want to rock the boat.

Coupled with a Republican "GOTV" strategy that imploded on election day. This wasn't a rejection of conservative principles (Mitt Romney? Conservative?) or affirmation of nanny liberalism. People "vote their wallets" and for the first time in a few years their wallets weren't completely empty back in November. That's all this was. If it's any consolation, Obama is tracking Bush #43's second term approval ratings pretty closely. And we know what happened in 2006 and 2008.

13 posted on 05/07/2013 4:28:59 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They had the complete wind at their back.

But Democrats were in charge of the vote count, especially from the touch-screen machines. They will not lose again unless we have a revolution in voting methods i.e. go back to ballot boxes. Cheating there is tedious and depends on machine control in areas that are already heavily Democrat. The electronic machines are easy. Once they are "downloaded" there is no further record of the vote. The download will say whatever it was programmed to say and depends on who is in charge of the count. A Soros company does that. There is no way to second guess the machines.

14 posted on 05/07/2013 5:02:45 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: untwist
we are stuck with the same House, same Senate to the end of Obama.

That could be a very long time.

15 posted on 05/07/2013 5:03:41 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Something that’s being taken into account is the number of Conservatives who have given up on the GOP and won’t waste another vote on that bunch of back-stabbers.


16 posted on 05/07/2013 5:14:30 AM PDT by EricT. (Another Muslim terrorist. Who saw that coming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Think “President Boehner”


17 posted on 05/07/2013 5:46:59 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nd76

You can tell he is right by the increasing number of shrill, whiny rants about gerrymandering in the DUmmysphere.


18 posted on 05/07/2013 6:07:03 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert

I’d rather not. I already have a headache.


19 posted on 05/07/2013 6:34:41 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222
The economy has been in a historically muted recovery, but still doing well enough that a few % of voters didn't want to rock the boat.

And face it, a majority of the low info Obama voters haven't been impacted by the sour economy.

20 posted on 05/07/2013 7:02:23 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson