Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Supreme Court rules both lesbian spouses’ names should be on child’s birth certificate
http://thegazette.com/2013/05/03/iowa-supreme-court-rules-both-lesbian-spouses-names-should-be-on-ch | 3 May 2013, 10:25 am CDT

Posted on 05/03/2013 10:23:16 AM PDT by newgeezer

Iowa Supreme Court rules both lesbian spouses’ names should be on child’s birth certificate

Case surfaced after state refused to list nonbirthing parent on birth certificate

The Iowa Supreme Court Friday affirmed a district court ruling that both spouses in a lesbian marriage should be listed on a child’s birth certificate.

The court ordered the Iowa Department of Public Health to reissue a birth certificate to Melissa and Heather Gartner, of Des Moines, for their daughter, Mackenzie Jean, who was born in September 2009. The department refused to list Melissa, the nonbirthing parent, on the birth certificate.

“It is important our laws recognize that married lesbian couples who have children enjoy the same benefits and burdens as married opposite-sex couples who have children,” the court wrote in a 29-page decision issued Friday.

“By naming the nonbirthing spouse on the birth certificate of a married lesbian couple’s child, the child is ensured supported from that parent and that parents establishes fundamental rights at the moment of birth,” the ruling states.

The Supreme Court’s 2009 Varnum vs. Brien decision legalizing same-sex marriage provides the bedrock for Friday’s decision, the court noted.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: homofascism; homoism; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: newgeezer

Would it help prevent this ?

TOPEKA, Kan. — A sperm donor is being ordered to pay child support to a couple he helped have a child.

William Marotta says he gave up all legal rights to the little girl.

But under Kansas law, because the couple didn’t use a doctor to get pregnant with Marotta’s sperm, the state says he’s responsible for the monthly child support payments, according to FOX 4.

Marotta met the lesbian couple through a Craigslist ad seeking a sperm donor.


21 posted on 05/03/2013 10:50:29 AM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Marotta is an idiot. I have no sympathy for him. Let the femi-nazi pro-butch courts rape him a new one.


22 posted on 05/03/2013 10:57:10 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: UB355
Would it help prevent this ?

If your article tells the whole story (and, if this was Kansas), a doctor would still be required to absolve the sperm donor of any responsibility. (Why is that? Why isn't a contract sufficient? Is the doctors' lobby that strong in KS?)

23 posted on 05/03/2013 10:59:45 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Actually, Mackinzie is a bastard. All else is just window dressing, pig lipstick.


24 posted on 05/03/2013 11:00:42 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
Actually, Mackinzie is a bastard. All else is just window dressing, pig lipstick.

You must not watch the Disney Channel. If you had, you would know that you can go anywhere in your imagination.

25 posted on 05/03/2013 11:01:51 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Interesting argument here...


26 posted on 05/03/2013 11:07:49 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
“It is important our laws recognize that married lesbian couples who have children enjoy the same benefits and burdens as married opposite-sex couples who have children,” the court wrote in a 29-page decision issued Friday.

I've scoured our constitutions again and a again, and no matter how many times I look, the legislative branch is the only branch with lawmaking power given to it.

27 posted on 05/03/2013 11:10:45 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
The Supreme Court’s 2009 Varnum vs. Brien decision legalizing same-sex marriage provides the bedrock for Friday’s decision, the court noted.

It did no such thing. Courts don't make laws. Iowa law to this day recognizes only real marriages.

28 posted on 05/03/2013 11:13:50 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

And then a year later, the ‘father’ claims ‘that’s not my child and I dare you to prove that it is’!


29 posted on 05/03/2013 11:14:52 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Well, yeah, and there was the recent case of the sperm donor guy who got sued for child support after the two “parent” queers split up. This is all “bedrock “of course.


30 posted on 05/03/2013 11:17:33 AM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

What an evil, Frankensteinian thing to do to human beings.....denying the Truth and Natural Law and artificially constructing an irrational reality for a child so he can not grow up in a realistic world. Always governed by “feelings” and never reaching maturity where Reason rules the emotions.

How evil and dehumanizing and selfish are these Marxists.

And to think we have a ‘Justice” system that denies Natural Laws (Science) and Reality and Truth. It is disgusting and evil and unconstitutional.

All Just Law has to be Right Reason.


31 posted on 05/03/2013 11:21:04 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
a baby takes a male and a female...a female and a female can not produce, nor a male and a male....

so be "married" you stupid idiots but you can't both claim parentage....its biologically impossible....

let this be a lesson...never let a dtr or niece or anyone female you know give up their baby to just anybody....make sure the child gets to a normal home with a normal marriage...

32 posted on 05/03/2013 11:26:14 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

This is quite literally a coup d’etat. The overturning of our republican form of representative self-government.

And the Republican “leadership” is complicit.

I’m so mad I could spit nails.

This is Varnum II.


33 posted on 05/03/2013 11:28:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
so these judges are using the lie about "financial" support to make up these insane rulings?.....so when does financial support have anything to do with parentage?

it'd be like letting an elephant and a woman be the official parents of a human baby because the elephant is strong and muscular and could protect the baby...

34 posted on 05/03/2013 11:28:59 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Deeper into the abyss.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
ON the subject of ‘deep abyss’.

I understand that since MD has instituted/passed/signed the ‘do funny marriage bill’ that come 1JAN if a ‘couple’ are partners and NOT MARRIED, they will revert to just another shack up and will not be able to share bennies UNTIL they get married.
Watch the FALLOUT from this little act.

Not only will ‘they’ be suing because the state is FORCING them to marry, once they WIN (and surely they will) the regular shack ups will declare that since the ‘do funnys’ can share bennies without getting married, then the straight shack ups should get bennies also.

And figure that not soon after, conventional room mates (as we know them..share house/apt etc WITH NO SEX INVOLVED) will be clamoring to get in on the act.

SO FAR this just is for State Employees BUT you can imagine the rest of the state will attempt to follow suit. (Dependent on who ‘benefits’ from it).

These new rules are making my hairline ache.


35 posted on 05/03/2013 11:29:33 AM PDT by xrmusn (6/98 --I turn 75 next year- but remember, that's only 24 Celsius. (TKS R. Reagan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

“It is important our laws recognize that married lesbian couples who have children enjoy the same benefits and burdens as married opposite-sex couples who have children,”

Even if we have to make it all up out of thin air!!!!!


36 posted on 05/03/2013 11:31:17 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (I may be drunk, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly. (Churchill))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
this could be a game changer as far as child support goes...because these judges just said it didn't matter who the bio parents were, just that two names go down on a paper saying they're parents for financial reasons...now its official...now its legal....they can't go after the baby daddy after the lezbos break up....because he would have NO official status...and he apparently is NOT the parent, let alone the father...

I don't mean to be hating on homosexuals....but its gone just too damn far especially when it comes to the welfare of a child...

37 posted on 05/03/2013 11:33:21 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Welcome to Bizzarro World.


38 posted on 05/03/2013 11:34:11 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
WHY ISN'T THE (sperm donating) FATHER OBLIGATED TO MARRY THE MOTHER, TREAT THE MOTHER AND CHILD WITH LOVE, AND PROVIDE CARE FOR MOTHER AND CHILD?

Why is this basic concept so difficult for a modern, educated, civilized society to grasp?

39 posted on 05/03/2013 11:50:05 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

Because “the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked” ...


40 posted on 05/03/2013 11:57:50 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson