Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boop

And those under fifteen who can get pregnant are not allowed to get the pill. Case a couple of weeks ago where the mother, 14, killed her baby and the husband, 15, no where around. Child was in care of grandmother. The pill can be arguable in both directions, pro/con.


18 posted on 04/30/2013 5:21:47 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SkyDancer

I don’t believe you. In what state can a 14 year old girl legally marry a 15 year old boy? And if such a thing happened, obviously the whole gang of them is so whacked out such violence would happen even if she had been allowed to kill the baby in the womb. And another reason your lame argument is fake is because abortion is legal. So if this 14 year old girl went crazy because she had a baby she didn’t want, she could have legally aborted it, or legally had it adopted.

Why are you promoting abortion on FR? The morning after pill is an abortifacient.


29 posted on 04/30/2013 5:49:10 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: SkyDancer

Decisions over innocent life and death do not belong to the arbitrary ruminations of situation ethics. The manufacture and distribution of abortifacients is morally reprehensible.


48 posted on 04/30/2013 6:56:11 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: SkyDancer

Your point is difficult to understand.


49 posted on 04/30/2013 6:59:36 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson