Your point is difficult to understand.
To some it would be. To other, understandable. So for your edification, why deny this pill to those who can become pregnant at ages under fifteen? Then I pointed out a story where a girl who’s fourteen killed her baby. The argument is not about abortion as some previous poster couldn’t comprehend the written word in English, but about the availability of this pill. It is not a pro/con argument re: abortion. It’s an argument of priorities of age. Children as young as nine have become pregnant.
Not if you check its comments, sort of consistent.