To some it would be. To other, understandable. So for your edification, why deny this pill to those who can become pregnant at ages under fifteen? Then I pointed out a story where a girl who’s fourteen killed her baby. The argument is not about abortion as some previous poster couldn’t comprehend the written word in English, but about the availability of this pill. It is not a pro/con argument re: abortion. It’s an argument of priorities of age. Children as young as nine have become pregnant.
So you’re saying children as young as nine who’ve gotten pregnant should also be able to use the morning after pill WHICH IS AN ABORTIFACIENT. GOT IT???
It prevents a fertilized egg from implanting in the womb. Kills it.
So your complaint with this pill is only that there is a cut off age? It should be available to the vast hosts of girls under 15 who get pregnant and want to kill the bany right quick before they’d have to get an abortion?