Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA Fires Back: Gun rights group to oppose Manchin, Toomey background check bill
Washington Free Beacon ^ | April 10, 2013 | CJ Ciaramella

Posted on 04/10/2013 10:36:37 AM PDT by xzins

The National Rifle Association will oppose the background check bill introduced by Sen. Joe Manchin (D., W.Va.) and Sen. Pat Toomey (R., Pa.) Wednesday, the pro-Second Amendment group told the Free Beacon.

Manchin and Toomey held a press conference Wednesday morning announcing a bipartisan bill that would expand background checks for all commercial firearm sales, including gun shows and Internet sales.

The bill is the latest effort by the Senate to introduce background check legislation, after negotiations between Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) and Democrats broke down earlier this year.

Manchin’s office told BuzzFeed Wednesday that the senators had been talking with the NRA, but the Second Amendment group had thus far remained “neutral.”

“The NRA has not said either way,” Katie Longo, Manchin’s press secretary, told BuzzFeed. “The senators have been talking to the NRA, but they’re still neutral.”

A spokesman for the NRA said the report was “wrong.”

The NRA reiterated its opposition to expanded background checks in a statement to the Washington Free Beacon.

“Expanding background checks at gun shows will not prevent the next shooting, will not solve violent crime and will not keep our kids safe in schools,” the NRA said. “While the overwhelming rejection of President Obama and Mayor Bloomberg’s ‘universal’ background check agenda is a positive development, we have a broken mental health system that is not going to be fixed with more background checks at gun shows.

“The sad truth is that no background check would have prevented the tragedy in Newtown, Aurora or Tucson,” the NRA’s statement continued. “We need a serious and meaningful solution that addresses crime in cities like Chicago, addresses mental health deficiencies, while at the same time protecting the rights of those of us who are not a danger to anyone. President Obama should be as committed to dealing with the gang problem that is tormenting honest people in his hometown as he is to blaming law-abiding gun owners for the acts of psychopathic murderers.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: 113th; banglist; braking; congress; donttreadonme; govtabuse; guncontrol; gunregistration; joemanchin; manchin; nocompromise; nra; pattoomey; pennsylvania; secondamendment; senate; shallnotbeinfringed; toomey; tyranny; waronliberty; westvirginia; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: DBrow

And it is wrong. If you can’t release a person back into society being reasonably sure that he will not commit another crime, then you haven’t kept him locked up long enough.At one time, I believe, in some states, when a man was released, his saddle and gun(s) were given back to him.Debt is paid.


81 posted on 04/10/2013 1:50:07 PM PDT by Quickgun (I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends





Please Help FR Complete THIS FReepathon THIS Month!

Contribute Today, no matter the amount.

82 posted on 04/10/2013 1:50:24 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
B T T T ! ! ! ©

83 posted on 04/10/2013 1:51:19 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Today it’s gun rights => now that they have your medical records everything else will cascade.

Tomorrow it’s your parental rights, 1st Amendment rights (Internet ID), 4th Amendment Right.


84 posted on 04/10/2013 2:13:24 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
Pat Toomey rode the TEA party coattail to come up with this legislation with Manchin (D-WV). That’s the real crime.

Exactly! Pat Toomey also had dinner at a posh restaurant with Dear Leader while Rand and Cruz were filibustering.

NOT IMPRESSED WITH TOOMEY!

Seems like a Traitor, Toomey.

85 posted on 04/10/2013 2:28:04 PM PDT by Jane Long (Background checks? Dandy idea, Mr. President. Shoulda started with yours. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nevermore

A God-given right not protected is a God-given right conceeded.

Ask your local newspaper reporter if s/he would be willing to submit to a government devised annual journalism test and credential registration.


86 posted on 04/10/2013 2:40:16 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (*Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

I still remember the bumper stickers that said “Defend Firearms. Support Specter” that the NRA distributed here in PA.

Toomey is home free until 2016. He hopes to rebuild cred on other issues to divert from this in the meantime.

Toomey will speak at something called the Pennsylvania Leadership Conference, a conservative CPAC type thing in the Harrisburg area on the weekend of April 19-20.

That event would probably be a good place for a large picket line.


87 posted on 04/10/2013 2:44:53 PM PDT by Nextrush (A BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ARE MY DREAMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nevermore; All

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3006374/posts

Police found a person who’d licensed and registered their guns, who according to an MD report was taking antidepressants.


88 posted on 04/10/2013 2:59:52 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“The NRA is about action.”

*******

By “action,” you mean endorsing Harry Reid for re-election in exchange for taxpayers being looted to pay for a gun range?

By “action,” you mean useless branding by sponsoring a NASCAR race?

By “action,” you mean using donations to build a direct marketing operation that simply solicits more donations (like the RNC)?

Or is there some other “action” that they do that’s worth more than a warm bucket of spit?


89 posted on 04/10/2013 3:11:21 PM PDT by peyton randolph (FUBO and his wookie beard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

And Toomey also supported getting rid of DADT.


90 posted on 04/10/2013 3:28:02 PM PDT by Windy City Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Windy City Conservative

And Toomey also supported the Obama tax increases. His ACU rating must be dropping like a rock.


91 posted on 04/10/2013 3:40:34 PM PDT by littleharbour ("All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree. ~ James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
Universal background checks requires universal registration.

There are a number of ways that rules could be written to require background checks to be performed on firearm sales without allowing any new sale-related information to flow to the government, but that wouldn't solve a more important danger with background checks: they make it much easier for the government to arbitrarily deny individuals' rights to keep and bear arms without any sort of due process. I think the latter point is probably a more effective argument, given that gun grabbers don't say they want registration lists to facilitate confiscation, but they have openly expressed their desire to disarm people who are not even suspected (much less convicted!) of any crime nor been ruled mentally incompetent by due process of law.

92 posted on 04/10/2013 3:56:47 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: supercat

>>There are a number of ways that rules could be written to require background checks to be performed on firearm sales without allowing any new sale-related information to flow to the government

But how would the government be able to know that a background check was done if it doesn’t know where the guns are in the first place? The gummint loves its metrics!

>> but that wouldn’t solve a more important danger with background checks: they make it much easier for the government to arbitrarily deny individuals’ rights to keep and bear arms without any sort of due process.

They could do that now since all dealer sales require a background check. To say that expanded checks would catch the people who can’t pass a background check now and have to go to private sales actually supports the anti-gun crowd’s assertion that unchecked private sales supply guns to people who shouldn’t own them.


93 posted on 04/10/2013 5:46:54 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

do you have a list of states and the various categories. I’m in PA and a relative by marriage is a felon now a minister. interesting to know if he could purchase legally ( lawfully)


94 posted on 04/10/2013 6:56:18 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

i lived in bloomsburg in 1978-80 and went to and had booths at the fair. Del Ziesloft(sp) killed an 600-800? lb bear that year. during the minor flood my trailer was parked on the bridge to fishtown. nice memories. move the trailer up om the mountain after that.


95 posted on 04/10/2013 7:15:22 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Nevermore

It will be nothing more than a national gun registry, a handy tool when the SHTF for confiscation..


96 posted on 04/10/2013 7:42:26 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Constitution? What Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: green iguana

Joe is a country boy who is basically conservative because he was raised that way. Problem with Joe in D.C. is he is naive. It’s not hard for the slick democRATs to bamboozle him. He understood politics WV style and he could honestly say he was pro-life, pro-second, anti-tax, conservative and get elected as a D. WV democrats are usually not your liberal types. The party got a foothold 100 years ago, along with the unions and they have intrenched in Charleston to the exclusion of the rest of WV. They control the money and the unions control them. It’s been a relationship that has produced the same kind of followers that the national party has: welfare takers and union thugs. The good people are on their own trying to work hard, be honest and love God.


97 posted on 04/10/2013 7:43:41 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

http://felonvoting.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=286

http://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2012/08/how-to-restore-gun-rights-after-a-felony.html

This should help you find search terms for your state.


98 posted on 04/10/2013 8:12:53 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

Thank you for the insight. Here in Texas, we used to have a lot of Democrats like that also, just without the union influence. But in the past 20 years or so, most have them have become Republicans.


99 posted on 04/11/2013 5:46:26 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

.
.

Free Republic is full of longterm moles, stealth happy horseshitters, and even DOJ paid “corrupt bastards” (Thanks Sarah Palin!) -

I recall a FR “Sidebar Poll” that asked FR members who they would pick for President -

18% picked Hillary Clinton -

When you post or read on FR you have no idea who is commenting and/or replying - or if they have the subhuman IQ of the alleged primate (Airball Opansy) occupying the Barack Hut now

.
.


100 posted on 04/11/2013 5:55:15 AM PDT by devolve ( -- -- liberals secret fuel economy trick -- simply fill up your tires with propane --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson