Posted on 04/06/2013 11:47:52 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer brought momentarily silence, and not the kind that is out of respect, to a Fox News panel on “Special Report” after National Review columnist Jonah Goldberg said that Obama will not get a vote on the majority of new gun control legislation that he wants. “All he wants now is the money,” Krauthammer responded.
Several seconds of silence followed Krauthammer’s, “all he wants now is the money” comment. It was as if everyone at the table had been caught off guard, including host Chris Wallace.
Wallace finally recovered stating, “You don’t really mean that.”
“He’s lost on gun control,” Krauthammer responded.
When opposed by stating that he would get expanded background checks, Krauthammer indicated that it is “not going to make any difference.” He also went on to state that background checks were the “last item standing, the smallest item standing.” He said it’s the only one that Obama could possibly get, which I point out would be a huge blow to gun owners and the Second Amendment. Remember, Gun Owners of America and the National Rifle Association openly oppose expansion of background checks. However, as I wrote about here, West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin and the NRA have been engaged in private talks on a proposal to broaden background checks on purchasers of firearms.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...
yes this is always the tactic, they try to make a big win, a small win beforehand, so it gives rinos something to cave in on, and tries to fool everyone else about ow bad the compromise was.
Look at what the person is saying... it’s obvious Monorprise has English as a second language. How many languages do you speak and write in Louis...
they already have as they illegally don’t get rid of the requests.
“Who are you and why are you writing such illiterate gibberish?”
Not everyone can be William Saffire.
The gun background check will have a voter background/ID rider.
nobody is going to do beckground checks on private sales because the checks being proposed are ob the buyer AND the seller
Saudi, NWO, GOP-e Masters
Always shifting always deceiving
“The big miracle for Obama is how his democratic base manages to remain so ignore of their dear leaders behavioral. You would think they would be upset with him for turning down his own proposals when offered.”
Obama’s base is clueless for two reasons:
1. They get their news from the MSM
2. They’ve been educated by enemies of the United States
Get with the program - to be literate today is to be a “self proclaimed intellectual snob”. Sigh!
Bingo. Organizing for America. Obama turned his campaign apparatus into a non-profit.
I hope someone is keeping an eye on it.
If UBC is enacted, every law-abiding citizen will have to get the governments OK before he can buy a firearm. (Why in Hell isn’t this point pushed?) Only the criminals will be able to do gun transfers when the computers go down “for maintenance” or “public safety” during a declared emergency - that’s the REAL hook.
Looks like iPad auto-grammar. Which is why I don’t post here using it.
I know. Ain’t it great?
they were stunned that someone on the panel actually made a truthful... an actually truthful.. statement.
people don’t understand that these people are all about the money
and Charles let it out of the bag
prolly dangerous for him to do it.
my respect for Mr. Krauthammer just went up a bit
Background checks are just a door to be opened later. What specifically are these “background” checks? What do they “check”? What are any listed reasons for using a background check to refuse a 2A right? Whatever they are, the libs will start adding all kinds of “reasons to reject” once they get it into law.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbRDARzWg7U
“All he wants now is the money.”
What Did Charles Krauthammer Say About Obama That Shocked a Fox Panel Into
I don't call universal registration of gun owners a small item. I call it getting what they were really after in the first place: a prelude to confiscation.
Yep. Sometimes Kraut gets the picture.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.