Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/01/2013 1:53:25 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney
Can't allow that.
2 posted on 04/01/2013 1:54:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Evil oil? NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


3 posted on 04/01/2013 1:56:29 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

http://communicationsinstitute.org/Monterey_Shale_Report_Final_130328.pdf

Executive Summary

The Monterey Shale Formation in California, like other shale oil and gas reserves around the nation,
has been widely cited as a potential “gold mine” of oil resources in California. Recent headlines attest to
its increasing role in the California energy debate:
- “Monterey’s black gold could jumpstart California’s
- “Could Monterey Shale Save California?” (Investors.com)
- “The battle is heating up over California’s vast Monterey shale field” (Examiner.com)

There is good reason for this interest: the Monterey Shale contains an estimated 15-plus billion
barrels of oil, representing more than two-thirds of all known U.S. shale reserves. But the story is not
quite so simple. Oil cannot be extracted from deep shale formations like Monterey through the use of
conventional oil wells, like those that dot many California landscapes. Rather, advanced oil-extraction
technologies, like hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, are required.

Hydraulic fracturing, a well-established, advanced means of extracting oil and natural gas from subsurface shale formations, has emerged in particular during the past several years as a technique with
high potential for increasing the volume of oil and natural gas producible within the United States. The
technique has been employed over the past decade in the Northeast and Upper Midwest, primarily in
the production of natural gas, and was cited last year by the International Energy Agency as a key factor
in the possibility that the United States soon could achieve the long-sought goal of net energy selfsufficiency.
However, advanced extraction technologies like hydraulic fracturing are not without their critics.

The technique has been blamed for such adverse environmental consequences as ground water
contamination, excessive wastewater production, increased seismic activity, and transportation and
land-use challenges. Such problems, were they to materialize in any major way in California, could
overwhelm the proposed benefits of developing the Monterey Shale, with the unfortunate result that
the more widely spread usage of the associated extraction technologies could wind up doing more harm
than good. While some analysts and proponents of hydraulic fracturing assert that these concerns either
are overstated or could be adequately addressed through effective regulation or remediation, the
balance of benefits and costs has not yet been definitively established.


4 posted on 04/01/2013 1:56:55 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Enviros: No. And not only no, but hell no........


6 posted on 04/01/2013 2:05:28 PM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

“While some analysts and proponents of hydraulic fracturing assert that these concerns either
are overstated or could be adequately addressed through effective regulation or remediation, the
balance of benefits and costs has not yet been definitively established.”

It is “controversial”, like the idea that steel ships might float. More studies are called for.


9 posted on 04/01/2013 2:15:59 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
There's probably some little *fishies* in a stream somewhere that this maybe-might will hurt or not.
Will need a big research grant, 50 year study period and another 50 years of legal fights.
That process shouldn't cost more than 4-5 billion.
11 posted on 04/01/2013 2:21:09 PM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

-— “This report provides an indication that there is one potential bright spot in California’s economic future: the increased production of energy,” the report stated. -—

I see that the report has a sense of humor.


12 posted on 04/01/2013 2:23:32 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Brown is already fracking California!!!


13 posted on 04/01/2013 2:40:05 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Jackpot from extorting energy companies or appeasing the enviros.

What’s a liberal governor to do?


14 posted on 04/01/2013 3:07:30 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
California is not interested in that.

If it happens, it needs to happen somewhere else.......dude.

15 posted on 04/01/2013 3:08:52 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
It will never happen. The Dark Side (Greenies) in CA are to strong. Besides, Jerry Brown wouldn't allow it.
16 posted on 04/01/2013 3:32:57 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Yeah, not gonna fracking happen. If there’s not already a law to prevent it from happening, there will be. There’s probably some rare worm or grub in the environmental areas they want to “rape and pillage” for evil energy, so that’s an obvious one right there.


18 posted on 04/01/2013 4:13:40 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Study: Fracking May Boost California's Economy, Adding 2.8M Jobs

That means OPEN THE BORDER!!!

19 posted on 04/01/2013 4:27:54 PM PDT by varon (USA Nationalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

When California fracks and gets gas........ California can make it's own water

23 posted on 04/01/2013 5:46:04 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson